warranty claim (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

warranty claim in Minnesota

10 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.green
minn · 1982 · cited in 6 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1985–2014
2 sentences

2014In Peterson we held that ”[t]o establish a warranty claim the plaintiff must basically prove: the existence of a warranty, a breach, and a causal link between the breach and the alleged harm." 318 N.W.2d at 52-53 .

2014“To establish a warranty claim the plaintiff must basically prove: the existence of a warranty, a breach, and a causal link between the breach and the alleged harm.” Peterson v. Bendix Home Sys., Inc., 318 N.W.2d 50, 52-53 (Minn. 1982).

56
Imdieke v. Blenda-Life, Inc.green
minnctapp · 1985 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
1 sentence

1989Imdieke v. Blenda-Life, Inc., 363 N.W.2d 121, 124 (Minn.Ct.App.1985), pet. for rev. denied (Minn. Apr. 26, 1985).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. green
minn · 2004
2 sentences

2015Vlahos was about the interpretation of Minn. Stat. § 541.051 , subd. 4, which provides that actions based on breach of a statutory warranty or an express written warranty “shall be brought within two years of the discovery of the breach.” In Vlahos, we held that the statute of limitations on a warranty claim began “to run when the homeowner discovers, or should have discovered, the builder’s refusal or inability to ensure the home is free from major construction defects.” 676 N.W.2d at 678 .

2015Vlahos was about the interpretation of Minn.Stat. § 541.051, subd. 4, which provides that actions based on breach of a statutory warranty or an express written warranty “shall be brought within two years of the discovery of the breach.” Ih Vlahos , we held that the statute of limitations on a warranty claim began “to run when the homeowner discovers, or should have discovered, the builder’s refusal or inability to ensure the home is free from major construction defects.” 676 N.W.2d at 678 .

22015–2015
Lyon Financial Services, Incor v. Illinois Paper and Copier Comp green
ca7 · 2013
1 sentence

2014Id. at 767 .

12014–2014
Hapka v. Paquin Farms green
minn · 1990
1 sentence

1993Under Hapka v. Paquin Farms, 458 N.W.2d 683 (Minn.1990), any claim that the judgment creditors have is a warranty claim.

11993–1993

Where else courts name it

TX 51 (1895–2026) NY 24 (1872–2024) CA 22 (1932–2024) OK 16 (1932–2019) LA 15 (1929–2024) GA 14 (1886–2006) NC 12 (1892–2009) AL 12 (1917–2018) PA 11 (1933–2022) NJ 11 (1968–2019) IL 11 (1886–2012) MN 10 (1985–2015) ND 9 (1992–2020) WA 8 (1911–2002) CO 8 (1950–2015) MI 8 (1975–2018) OH 7 (1929–2010) VA 7 (1910–2012) FL 6 (1991–2008) SC 6 (1911–2006) IN 6 (1890–2017) MO 5 (1905–1988) MA 5 (1978–2009) KY 4 (1955–2015) NM 4 (1983–2025) WI 4 (1896–2025) MS 4 (1953–2008) VT 4 (1998–2026) CT 3 (1987–2015) DE 3 (2004–2022) SD 3 (1986–2008) UT 3 (1992–2021) MT 3 (1950–1953) WY 3 (1986–2016) ME 2 (1985–2002) OR 2 (1971–2022) DC 2 (1996–2024) MD 2 (1983–2001) AR 2 (1937–1974) AK 2 (1982–2014) IA 2 (2000–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check