Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Eagle Cove Camp & Conference C v. Town of Woodboro, Wisconsingreen1 sentence2019See Eagle Cove Camp & Conference Ctr., Inc. v. Town of Woodboro, 734 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2013) (Eagle Cove I).4 The Seventh Circuit denied Eagle Cove’s motion for 4 As we will explain, the Seventh Circuit’s analysis on one of the RLUIPA claims was later called into question by two decisions of the United States Supreme Court. | 1 | 1 |
David Schlemm v. Matthew Frankgreen1 sentence2019See Schlemm v. Wall, 784 F.3d 362, 364 (7th Cir. 2015) (recognizing abrogation). 7 No. 2018AP940 rehearing and rehearing en banc. | 1 | 1 |
Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Scott Walkergreen2 sentences2018See Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Walker , 2014 WI 99 , ¶ 68, 358 Wis. 2d 1 , 851 N.W.2d 337 ("While the Seventh Circuit's analysis of Act 10 is not binding on this court, we find no reason to disagree with its clear and rational articulation of the law."). 2018See Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Walker , 2014 WI 99 , ¶ 68, 358 Wis. 2d 1 , 851 N.W.2d 337 ("While the Seventh Circuit's analysis of Act 10 is not binding on this court, we find no reason to disagree with its clear and rational articulation of the law."). | 1 | 1 |
Georgia v. Randolphgreen1 sentence2011See Henderson, 536 F.3d at 781 (citing Randolph, 547 U.S. at 127 (Breyer, J., concurring)). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Hendersongreen1 sentence2011See Henderson, 536 F.3d at 781 (citing Randolph, 547 U.S. at 127 (Breyer, J., concurring)). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 595230green2 sentences2006Co., 979 F.2d 1187, 1202 (7th Cir.1992). 2006Co., 979 F.2d 1187, 1202 (7th Cir. 1992). | 1 | 1 |
Bruno v. City Of Crown Pointgreen1 sentence2000In employment discrimination cases under Title VTÍ and § 1983, the plaintiff must prove that he or she has been the victim of intentional discrimination. *82 See Bruno v. City of Crown Point, 950 F.2d 355, 361 (7th Cir. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Theodore W. Oswald v. Daniel Bertrand
green
2 sentences2017In contrast, the federal court of appeals affirmed the district court but concluded that the inquiry the Wisconsin circuit court conducted "flunked the constitutional test that 'the investigation be reasonably calculated to resolve the doubts raised about the juror's impartiality.' " Oswald v. Bertrand, 374 F.3d 475 (7th Cir. 2004) (quoted source omitted). 2017In contrast, the federal court of appeals affirmed the district court but concluded that the inquiry the Wisconsin circuit court conducted "flunked the constitutional test that 'the investigation be reasonably calculated to resolve the doubts raised about the juror's impartiality.'" Oswald v. Bertrand, 374 F.3d 475 (7th Cir. 2004) (quoted source omitted). 6 For a discussion of the development of Wisconsin's juror bias case law and the challenges that the case law has created for the bench and bar, see Kurt F. Ellison, Getting Out of the Funk: How Wisconsin Courts Can Protect Against the Threat | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Carol J. Zeisler, and Barry M. Barash and Barash, Stoerzbach & Henson v. Susan Neese, Doing Business as Neese Motors
green
1 sentence2014Id. at 1001 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Kurt Froebel v. George E. Meyer
green
2 sentences2010The Seventh Circuit's analysis included its observation that had the plaintiff "asked the Wisconsin administrative or judicial tribunals to entertain his [federal Clean Water Act] claims,. . . they could have done so." Froebel, 217 F.3d at 935 . 2010In addition, the court expressed "no doubt that Wisconsin cannot give discretion to its administrative agencies to violate federal law, since such a statute would run contrary to the Supremacy Clause." Id. at 936 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Poling v. Wisconsin Physicians Service
green
1 sentence2006"The only escape clause for avoidance of this interest assessment is when the insurer has reasonable proof that it is not responsible for the payment." Id. ¶ 32 Lending further support to a broad, inclusive reading is the Seventh Circuit's analysis in Allison v. Ticor Title Insurance Co. The federal appellate court construed the interplay of Wis. Stat. § 628.46 with Wis. Stat. § 646.31 (2) and determined that the classes of claims to be paid under § 628.46 include "residents, certain nonresidents, owners of property interests, third party claimants, and assignees." Allison v. Ticor Title Ins. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.