Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1982–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,481 Hilda Herbst v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corporationgreen1 sentence1982The Second Circuit stated that “[¿Judicial efficiency requires that appellate review be made before the parties and district courts have spent considerable time, effort and money on such actions,” Herbst v. International Telephone and Telegraph, Corp., 495 F.2d 1308, at 1313 (2nd Cir. 1974). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Estate of Teubert
green
2 sentences2005The third and final requirement for a valid holographic will in our jurisdiction is that the writing must evidence a testamentary intent.’ Syl. pt. 1, In re Estate of Teubert, 171 W.Va. 226 , 298 S.E.2d 456 (1982).” In addition, in Syllabus Point 3 of Charleston Nat. 2005The third and final requirement for a valid holographic will in our jurisdiction is that the writing must evidence a testamentary intent.’ Syl. pt. 1, In re Estate of Teubert, 171 W.Va. 226 , 298 S.E.2d 456 (1982).” In addition, in Syllabus Point 3 of Charleston Nat. | 5 | 1987–2019 |
Runyon v. Mills
neutral
2 sentences1986The third and final requirement for a valid holographic will in our jurisdiction is that the writing must evidence a testamentary intent.” Also, in syllabus point 3 the Court reiterated a long-standing rule that: “ ‘Technical words are not necessary in making testamentary disposition of property; any language which clearly indicates the testator’s inten *230 tion to dispose of his property to certain persons, either named or ascertainable, is sufficient.’ Syllabus Point 1, Runyon v. Mills, 86 W.Va. 388 , 103 S.E. 112 (1920).” Finally, the Court discussed at some length the question of what evi 1986The third and final requirement for a valid holographic will in our jurisdiction is that the writing must evidence a testamentary intent.” Also, in syllabus point 3 the Court reiterated a long-standing rule that: “ ‘Technical words are not necessary in making testamentary disposition of property; any language which clearly indicates the testator’s inten *230 tion to dispose of his property to certain persons, either named or ascertainable, is sufficient.’ Syllabus Point 1, Runyon v. Mills, 86 W.Va. 388 , 103 S.E. 112 (1920).” Finally, the Court discussed at some length the question of what evi | 1 | 1986–1986 |
In Re Estate of Briggs
green
2 sentences1982In Syllabus Points 4 and 5 of In Re: Estate of Briggs, 148 W.Va. 294 , 134 S.E.2d 737 (1964), we elaborated on this third requirement as follows: “4. 1982In Syllabus Points 4 and 5 of In Re: Estate of Briggs, 148 W.Va. 294 , 134 S.E.2d 737 (1964), we elaborated on this third requirement as follows: “4. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.