Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1973–1991 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Yielding v. Stategreen1 sentence1980See Yielding v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 371 So.2d 951 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Spinelli v. United States
red
2 sentences1991First of all, unlike the information relayed by the tip in Stanfield v. State , 529 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988), which this Court observed "could easily have been obtained from an offhand remark heard at a neighborhood bar," Stanfield , 529 So.2d at 1057 (quoting Spinelli v. United States , 393 U.S. at 417 , 89 S.Ct. at 589 ), the information relayed to Deputy Martin's informant was based upon what the informant had seen and heard. 1991First of all, unlike the information relayed by the tip in Stanfield v. State , 529 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988), which this Court observed "could easily have been obtained from an offhand remark heard at a neighborhood bar," Stanfield , 529 So.2d at 1057 (quoting Spinelli v. United States , 393 U.S. at 417 , 89 S.Ct. at 589 ), the information relayed to Deputy Martin's informant was based upon what the informant had seen and heard. | 5 | 1973–1991 |
Stanfield v. State
green
2 sentences1991First of all, unlike the information relayed by the tip in Stanfield v. State , 529 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988), which this Court observed "could easily have been obtained from an offhand remark heard at a neighborhood bar," Stanfield , 529 So.2d at 1057 (quoting Spinelli v. United States , 393 U.S. at 417 , 89 S.Ct. at 589 ), the information relayed to Deputy Martin's informant was based upon what the informant had seen and heard. 1991First of all, unlike the information relayed by the tip in Stanfield v. State , 529 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988), which this Court observed "could easily have been obtained from an offhand remark heard at a neighborhood bar," Stanfield , 529 So.2d at 1057 (quoting Spinelli v. United States , 393 U.S. at 417 , 89 S.Ct. at 589 ), the information relayed to Deputy Martin's informant was based upon what the informant had seen and heard. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Pilkington v. State
green
1 sentence1979The informant's information was detailed and based on personal observation, and a neutral and detached magistrate could thus conclude that the allegations were based on fact rather than suspicion, casual rumor, or "from an off-hand remark heard at the neighborhood bar." The present case can be distinguished from Pilkington v. State, supra, in which none of the items listed in the search warrant was found. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.