automatic reversal rule (Arizona) · Go Syfert
← Arizona issues

automatic reversal rule in Arizona

7 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (22)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Hickmangreen
ariz · 2003 · cited in 4 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2008
2 sentences

2008Hickman, 205 Ariz. 192, ¶¶ 20-21, 39 , 68 P.3d at 422, 427 .

2004P. 23.4 (requiring jury to be polled); Audette v. Isaksen Fishing Corp., 789 F.2d 956, 958-59 (1st Cir. 1986)(citing cases to effect that polling of jury is of ancient origin, to ensure verdict was unanimous, was reached without coercion and to allow juror to change his or her mind). [7] See State v. Levato, 186 Ariz. 441, 443, 445 , 924 P.2d 445, 447, 449 (1996) (although constitutional right to be present was infringed, and defense counsel declined to waive defendant's presence, trial court's acceding to defense counsel's request that return of verdict and polling occur during defendant's ab

24
State v. Huertagreen
ariz · 1993 · cited in 5 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2001–2008
2 sentences

2008In Hickman , the supreme court overturned the automatic-reversal rule in State v. Huerta, 175 Ariz. 262 , 855 P.2d 776 (1993), and held a defendant’s curative use of a peremptory strike to remove a prospective juror who should have been stricken for cause is subject to harmless error review.

2008In Hickman , the supreme court overturned the automatic-reversal rule in State v. Huerta, 175 Ariz. 262 , 855 P.2d 776 (1993), and held a defendant’s curative use of a peremptory strike to remove a prospective juror who should have been stricken for cause is subject to harmless error review.

15
Albert G. Audette v. Isaksen Fishing Corporationgreen
ca1 · 1986 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004P. 23.4 (requiring jury to be polled); Audette v. Isaksen Fishing Corp., 789 F.2d 956, 958-59 (1st Cir. 1986)(citing cases to effect that polling of jury is of ancient origin, to ensure verdict was unanimous, was reached without coercion and to allow juror to change his or her mind). [7] See State v. Levato, 186 Ariz. 441, 443, 445 , 924 P.2d 445, 447, 449 (1996) (although constitutional right to be present was infringed, and defense counsel declined to waive defendant's presence, trial court's acceding to defense counsel's request that return of verdict and polling occur during defendant's ab

11
State v. Levatogreen
ariz · 1996 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004P. 23.4 (requiring jury to be polled); Audette v. Isaksen Fishing Corp., 789 F.2d 956, 958-59 (1st Cir. 1986)(citing cases to effect that polling of jury is of ancient origin, to ensure verdict was unanimous, was reached without coercion and to allow juror to change his or her mind). [7] See State v. Levato, 186 Ariz. 441, 443, 445 , 924 P.2d 445, 447, 449 (1996) (although constitutional right to be present was infringed, and defense counsel declined to waive defendant's presence, trial court's acceding to defense counsel's request that return of verdict and polling occur during defendant's ab

2004P. 23.4 (requiring jury to be polled); Audette v. Isaksen Fishing Corp., 789 F.2d 956, 958-59 (1st Cir. 1986)(citing cases to effect that polling of jury is of ancient origin, to ensure verdict was unanimous, was reached without coercion and to allow juror to change his or her mind). [7] See State v. Levato, 186 Ariz. 441, 443, 445 , 924 P.2d 445, 447, 449 (1996) (although constitutional right to be present was infringed, and defense counsel declined to waive defendant's presence, trial court's acceding to defense counsel's request that return of verdict and polling occur during defendant's ab

11
People v. Gleashgreen
illappct · 1991 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
State v. Traylorgreen
wisctapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
Mettetal v. Stategreen
miss · 1992 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
State v. Tranbygreen
nd · 1989 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
Pickens v. Stategreen
ark · 1990 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
Williams v. Commonwealthgreen
kyctapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
Vaughn v. Stategreen
ind · 1990 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
United States v. Alfred Lee Apodacagreen
ca10 · 1988 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003A "trial court constructively amends the indictment if it allows the Government to prove its case in a fashion that creates a substantial likelihood that the defendant may have been convicted of an offense other than that charged in the indictment." United States v. Apodaca, 843 F.2d 421, 428 (10th Cir.1988) (internal quotations omitted).

2003A “trial court constructively amends the indictment if it allows the Government to prove its ease in a fashion that creates a substantial likelihood that the defendant may have been convicted of an offense other than that charged in the indictment.” United States v. Apodaca, 843 F.2d 421, 428 (10th Cir.1988) (internal quotations omitted).

11
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abel MARTINEZ-SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellantgreen
ca9 · 1998 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003As pointed out by the Court in Martinez-Salazar , the reality is that "[t]rial courts, state and federal, rule on cause challenges by the minute," 528 U.S. at 310 , 120 S.Ct. 774 (quoting United States v. Martinez-Salazar, 146 F.3d 653, 661 (9th Cir.1998) (Rymer, J., dissenting)), "often [deciding] between shades of gray." Id. at 316, 120 S.Ct. 774 .

2003As pointed out by the Court in Martinez-Salazar , the reality is that “[t]rial courts, state and federal, rule on cause challenges by the minute,” 528 U.S. at 310 , 120 S.Ct. 774 (quoting United States v. Martinez-Salazar, 146 F.3d 653, 661 (9th Cir.1998) (Rymer, J., dissenting)), “often [deciding] between shades of gray.” Id. at 316, 120 S.Ct. 774 .

11
Trotter v. Stategreen
fla · 1990 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
State v. Menziesgreen
utah · 1994 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
State v. Middlebrooksred
tenn · 1992 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
State v. Broomgreen
ohio · 1988 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
State v. DiFriscogreen
nj · 1994 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
State v. Greengreen
sc · 1990 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
State v. Neuendorfgreen
iowa · 1993 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
Hunt v. Stategreen
md · 1990 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11
Dawson v. Stategreen
del · 1990 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Encinas v. State green
ariz · 1923
2 sentences

2003Id. at 391-92 , 206 P.2d at 1040 . 6 Hence, under such circumstances, a defendant is prejudiced because “an objectionable juror was forced upon the defendant.” Encinas, 26 Ariz. at 29 , 221 P. at 233 . ¶ 27 Huerta relied to a great extent on Wasko in applying the automatic reversal rule to criminal cases. 175 Ariz. at 265 , 855 P.2d at 779 .

2003Id. at 391-92 , 206 P.2d at 1040 . 6 Hence, under such circumstances, a defendant is prejudiced because “an objectionable juror was forced upon the defendant.” Encinas, 26 Ariz. at 29 , 221 P. at 233 . ¶ 27 Huerta relied to a great extent on Wasko in applying the automatic reversal rule to criminal cases. 175 Ariz. at 265 , 855 P.2d at 779 .

12003–2003
Dawson v. Delaware green
scotus · 1992
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

12003–2003
United States v. Martinez-Salazar green
scotus · 2000
2 sentences

2003As pointed out by the Court in Martinez-Salazar , the reality is that “[t]rial courts, state and federal, rule on cause challenges by the minute,” 528 U.S. at 310 , 120 S.Ct. 774 (quoting United States v. Martinez-Salazar, 146 F.3d 653, 661 (9th Cir.1998) (Rymer, J., dissenting)), “often [deciding] between shades of gray.” Id. at 316, 120 S.Ct. 774 .

2003As pointed out by the Court in Martinez-Salazar , the reality is that “[t]rial courts, state and federal, rule on cause challenges by the minute,” 528 U.S. at 310 , 120 S.Ct. 774 (quoting United States v. Martinez-Salazar, 146 F.3d 653, 661 (9th Cir.1998) (Rymer, J., dissenting)), “often [deciding] between shades of gray.” Id. at 316, 120 S.Ct. 774 .

12003–2003
State v. Graham green
haw · 1989
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

2003See, e.g., Pickens v. State, 301 Ark. 244 , 783 S.W.2d 341, 345 (1990); Dawson v. State, 581 A.2d 1078, 1093-94 (Del.1990), vacated on other grounds by Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 , 112 S.Ct. 1093 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992); Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla.1990); State v. Graham, 70 Haw. 627 , 780 P.2d 1103 , 1108 n. 3 (1989); People v. Gleash, 209 Ill.App.3d 598 , 154 Ill.Dec. 348 , 568 N.E.2d 348, 353 (1991); Vaughn v. State, 559 N.E.2d 610, 614 (Ind.1990); State v. Neuendorf, 509 N.W.2d 743, 747 (Iowa 1993); Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942, 943 (Ky.Ct.App.1992); Hunt v

12003–2003
Ross v. Oklahoma green
scotus · 1988
2 sentences

2003Id. at 91 , 108 S.Ct. 2273 . 3 ¶ 8 After Ross, most jurisdictions that considered the issue either rejected the automatic reversal rule or reaffirmed their jurisdiction’s prior opinions that the curative use of a peremptory challenge was not reversible error, absent prejudice to the defendant.

2003Id. at 91 , 108 S.Ct. 2273 . 3 ¶ 8 After Ross, most jurisdictions that considered the issue either rejected the automatic reversal rule or reaffirmed their jurisdiction’s prior opinions that the curative use of a peremptory challenge was not reversible error, absent prejudice to the defendant.

12003–2003
State v. Thompson green
ariz · 1949
2 sentences

2003Id. at 391-92 , 206 P.2d at 1040 . 6 Hence, under such circumstances, a defendant is prejudiced because “an objectionable juror was forced upon the defendant.” Encinas, 26 Ariz. at 29 , 221 P. at 233 . ¶ 27 Huerta relied to a great extent on Wasko in applying the automatic reversal rule to criminal cases. 175 Ariz. at 265 , 855 P.2d at 779 .

2003Id. at 391-92 , 206 P.2d at 1040 . 6 Hence, under such circumstances, a defendant is prejudiced because “an objectionable juror was forced upon the defendant.” Encinas, 26 Ariz. at 29 , 221 P. at 233 . ¶ 27 Huerta relied to a great extent on Wasko in applying the automatic reversal rule to criminal cases. 175 Ariz. at 265 , 855 P.2d at 779 .

12003–2003
State v. Ibanez green
arizctapp · 2001
2 sentences

2003SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION ORDER HALL, J. ¶ 1 In State v. Ibanez, 201 Ariz. 56 , 31 P.3d 830 (App.2001), applying the automatic-reversal rule for erroneous denials of challenges for cause adopted by the Arizona Supreme Court in State v. Huerta, 175 Ariz. 262 , 855 P.2d 776 (1993), we reversed defendant’s convictions for aggravated DUI and remanded for a new trial.

2003SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION ORDER HALL, J. ¶ 1 In State v. Ibanez, 201 Ariz. 56 , 31 P.3d 830 (App.2001), applying the automatic-reversal rule for erroneous denials of challenges for cause adopted by the Arizona Supreme Court in State v. Huerta, 175 Ariz. 262 , 855 P.2d 776 (1993), we reversed defendant’s convictions for aggravated DUI and remanded for a new trial.

12003–2003
Myers v. Reeb green
arizctapp · 1997
2 sentences

2001Myers, 190 Ariz. at 342 , 947 P.2d at 916 . ¶ 19 Accordingly, we reverse and remand with a direction that Ibanez be granted a new trial.

2001Myers, 190 Ariz. at 342 , 947 P.2d at 916 . ¶ 19 Accordingly, we reverse and remand with a direction that Ibanez be granted a new trial.

12001–2001

Where else courts name it

CA 27 (1984–2024) MI 24 (1977–2023) CO 23 (2010–2026) IL 15 (1992–2019) TX 10 (1986–2017) KS 8 (2008–2021) AZ 7 (2001–2008) IA 7 (2002–2025) WA 7 (2001–2011) CT 6 (1987–2025) IN 6 (1975–2020) PA 6 (1967–2009) NY 5 (1983–2014) MD 5 (2004–2022) WI 4 (1983–2001) NJ 4 (1988–2005) MO 3 (1984–2014) GA 3 (2003–2024) TN 3 (2003–2025) ID 2 (1981–2009) UT 2 (1994–1994) OH 2 (1987–2009) LA 2 (2010–2012) WY 2 (2004–2019) MN 2 (2002–2011)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check