exhaustion of administrative remedies is well doctrine (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

exhaustion of administrative remedies is well doctrine in Connecticut

8 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1999–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Stepney, LLC v. Town of Fairfieldgreen
conn · 2003 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2011–2023
2 sentences

2023See, e.g., Stepney, LLC v. Fairfield, 263 Conn. 558, 563 , 821 A.2d 725 (2003). ‘‘The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is well established in the jurisprudence of administrative law. . . .

2023See, e.g., Stepney, LLC v. Fairfield, 263 Conn. 558, 563 , 821 A.2d 725 (2003). ‘‘The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is well established in the jurisprudence of administrative law. . . .

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
City of Hartford v. Hartford Municipal Employees Ass'n green
conn · 2002
2 sentences

2002The doctrine provides that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted. . . ." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Hartford v. Hartford Municipal Employees Assn ., 259 Conn. 251 , 281 , 788 A.2d 60 (2002).

2002The doctrine provides that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted. . . ." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Hartford v. Hartford Municipal Employees Assn ., 259 Conn. 251 , 281 , 788 A.2d 60 (2002).

22002–2002
Godbout v. Attanasio green
connappct · 2020
2 sentences

2022We begin with our standard of review. ‘‘Because the exhaustion [of administrative remedies] doctrine implicates subject matter jurisdiction, [the court] must decide as a threshold matter whether that doctrine requires dismissal of the [defendant’s] claim. . . . [B]ecause [a] determination regarding a trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law, our review is plenary.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Godbout v. Attanasio, 199 Conn. App. 88, 97 , 234 A.3d 1031 (2020). ‘‘The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is well established in the jurisprudence of admin

2022We begin with our standard of review. ‘‘Because the exhaustion [of administrative remedies] doctrine implicates subject matter jurisdiction, [the court] must decide as a threshold matter whether that doctrine requires dismissal of the [defendant’s] claim. . . . [B]ecause [a] determination regarding a trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law, our review is plenary.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Godbout v. Attanasio, 199 Conn. App. 88, 97 , 234 A.3d 1031 (2020). ‘‘The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is well established in the jurisprudence of admin

12022–2022
BRT General Corp. v. Water Pollution Control Authority green
conn · 2003
2 sentences

2011The doctrine provides that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) BRT General Corp. v. Water Pollution Control Authority, 265 Conn. 114, 123 , 826 A.2d 1109 (2003).

2011The doctrine provides that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) BRT General Corp. v. Water Pollution Control Authority, 265 Conn. 114, 123 , 826 A.2d 1109 (2003).

12011–2011
Johnson v. Statewide Grievance Committee green
conn · 1999
1 sentence

2001The doctrine provides that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Johnson v. Statewide Grievance Committee , 248 Conn. 87 , 95 , 726 A.2d 11 54 (1999).

12001–2001
Raymond v. Rock Acquisition Ltd. Partnership neutral
connappct · 1998
2 sentences

1999Partnership , 50 Conn. App. 411 , 717 A.2d 824 (1998). "`The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is well established in the jurisprudence of administrative law. . . .

1999Partnership , 50 Conn. App. 411 , 717 A.2d 824 (1998). "`The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is well established in the jurisprudence of administrative law. . . .

11999–1999

Where else courts name it

CT 8 (1999–2023) KS 4 (1981–2009) TX 3 (2010–2010) WA 3 (1986–2025) OH 2 (1975–2006) DC 2 (1976–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check