7 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Dhawndric McDowellgreen2 sentences2019Cir. 1999) (explaining that United States Supreme Court has ‘‘created something of a hybrid rule having elements both of admissibility and sufficiency’’); see also United States v. McDowell, 687 F.3d 904, 912 (7th Cir. 2012) (‘‘[t]he corroboration principle sometimes comes into play in the trial court’s decision to admit the defendant’s confession and also if he later challenges the sufficiency of the evidence’’); United States v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733, 737 (1st Cir.) (discussing dual nature of rule), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1048 , 115 S. Ct. 647 , 130 L. 2019Cir. 1999) (explaining that United States Supreme Court has ‘‘created something of a hybrid rule having elements both of admissibility and sufficiency’’); see also United States v. McDowell, 687 F.3d 904, 912 (7th Cir. 2012) (‘‘[t]he corroboration principle sometimes comes into play in the trial court’s decision to admit the defendant’s confession and also if he later challenges the sufficiency of the evidence’’); United States v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733, 737 (1st Cir.) (discussing dual nature of rule), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1048 , 115 S. Ct. 647 , 130 L. | 4 | 4 |
United States v. Daryl E. Singleterrygreen2 sentences2019Cir. 1999) (explaining that United States Supreme Court has ‘‘created something of a hybrid rule having elements both of admissibility and sufficiency’’); see also United States v. McDowell, 687 F.3d 904, 912 (7th Cir. 2012) (‘‘[t]he corroboration principle sometimes comes into play in the trial court’s decision to admit the defendant’s confession and also if he later challenges the sufficiency of the evidence’’); United States v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733, 737 (1st Cir.) (discussing dual nature of rule), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1048 , 115 S. Ct. 647 , 130 L. 2019Cir. 1999) (explaining that United States Supreme Court has ‘‘created something of a hybrid rule having elements both of admissibility and sufficiency’’); see also United States v. McDowell, 687 F.3d 904, 912 (7th Cir. 2012) (‘‘[t]he corroboration principle sometimes comes into play in the trial court’s decision to admit the defendant’s confession and also if he later challenges the sufficiency of the evidence’’); United States v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733, 737 (1st Cir.) (discussing dual nature of rule), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1048 , 115 S. Ct. 647 , 130 L. | 2 | 3 |
Dilieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.green2 sentences2024Id., 88–91; see also DiLieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C., 297 Conn. 105 , 129 n.30, 998 A.2d 730 (2010). 2024Id., 88–91; see also DiLieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C., 297 Conn. 105 , 129 n.30, 998 A.2d 730 (2010). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Dickerson, Mark A.green2 sentences2016See, e.g., United States v. McDowell, supra, at 912 ; United States v. Dickerson, supra, at 642-43 ; United States v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733 , 737-38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1048 , 115 S.Ct. 647 , 130 L.Ed.2d 552 (1994). 2016For example, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently stated: "The corroboration principle sometimes comes into play in the trial court's decision to admit the defendant's confession and also if he later challenges the sufficiency of the evidence." United States v. McDowell, 687 F.3d 904 , 912 (7th Cir.2012) ; see also United States v. Dickerson, 163 F.3d 639 , 642 (D.C.Cir.1999) ("[t]o be sure, the corroboration requirement has also been described as a rule governing the sufficiency of the evidence"). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Keenan Pricegreen2 sentences2007See United States v. Price, 458 F.3d 202, 205 (3d Cir. 2006) (“Whether a statement is hearsay is a legal question subject to plenary review. ... 2007See United States v. Price, 458 F.3d 202, 205 (3d Cir.2006) ("Whether a statement is hearsay is a legal question subject to plenary review. . . . | 1 | 1 |
Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of Appealsgreen2 sentences1954See Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of Appeals, 140 Conn. 527, 531 , 102 A.2d 316 . 1954See Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of Appeals, 140 Conn. 527, 531 , 102 A.2d 316 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Singleterry v. United States
green
2 sentences2019Cir. 1999) (explaining that United States Supreme Court has ‘‘created something of a hybrid rule having elements both of admissibility and sufficiency’’); see also United States v. McDowell, 687 F.3d 904, 912 (7th Cir. 2012) (‘‘[t]he corroboration principle sometimes comes into play in the trial court’s decision to admit the defendant’s confession and also if he later challenges the sufficiency of the evidence’’); United States v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733, 737 (1st Cir.) (discussing dual nature of rule), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1048 , 115 S. Ct. 647 , 130 L. 2019Cir. 1999) (explaining that United States Supreme Court has ‘‘created something of a hybrid rule having elements both of admissibility and sufficiency’’); see also United States v. McDowell, 687 F.3d 904, 912 (7th Cir. 2012) (‘‘[t]he corroboration principle sometimes comes into play in the trial court’s decision to admit the defendant’s confession and also if he later challenges the sufficiency of the evidence’’); United States v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733, 737 (1st Cir.) (discussing dual nature of rule), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1048 , 115 S. Ct. 647 , 130 L. | 3 | 2016–2019 |
State v. Hafford
green
2 sentences2016I conclude that despite the fact that the defendant did not object to the admission into evidence of his confessions to cellmates, on review of the sufficiency of all of the evidence including those confessions, it is important to review the record to assure that there was not only corroboration of the trustworthiness of the confessions to ensure that they were reliable and trustworthy, but to establish that trustworthiness, there be some independent evidence that the victim was dead. 13 I therefore agree with the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in United States v. McDow 2016I conclude that despite the fact that the defendant did not object to the admission into evidence of his confessions to cellmates, on review of the sufficiency of all of the evidence including those confessions, it is important to review the record to assure that there was not only corroboration of the trustworthiness of the confessions to ensure that they were reliable and trustworthy, but to establish that trustworthiness, there be some independent evidence that the victim was dead. 13 I therefore agree with the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in United States v. McDow | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.