hybrid standard (Alaska) · Go Syfert
← Alaska issues

hybrid standard in Alaska

6 Alaska opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (11)

CaseFollowedCited
Jon S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Servicesgreen
alaska · 2009 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Julian urges us to affirm the hybrid standard stated in Jon S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children’s Services: “Whether substantial evidence supports the court’s findings that the state . . . proved beyond a reasonable doubt that granting the parent custody would likely result in serious damage to the child [is a] mixed question[] of law and fact.”48 But 47 25 U.S.C. § 1912 (f). 48 212 P.3d 756, 761 (Alaska 2009) (citing E.A. v. State, Div. of Family & Youth Servs., 46 P.3d 986, 989 (Alaska 2002)); accord Diana P. v. State, Dep’t of Health & Soc.

11
Diana P. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Servicesgreen
alaska · 2015 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Servs., Office of Children’s Servs., 355 P.3d 541, 546 (Alaska 2015). -13- 1714 OCS’s brief cites Thea G. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children’s Services: “A trial court’s determination that a parent’s continued custody of a child will likely result in the child suffering serious emotional or physical damage is a factual finding that [this court] review[s] for clear error.”49 (Alteration in original.) We acknowledge that these cases appear to diverge on whether a determination of likely serious harm to the child is a purely factual question — which would be revi

11
E. A. v. State, Division of Family & Youth Servicesgreen
alaska · 2002 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Julian urges us to affirm the hybrid standard stated in Jon S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children’s Services: “Whether substantial evidence supports the court’s findings that the state . . . proved beyond a reasonable doubt that granting the parent custody would likely result in serious damage to the child [is a] mixed question[] of law and fact.”48 But 47 25 U.S.C. § 1912 (f). 48 212 P.3d 756, 761 (Alaska 2009) (citing E.A. v. State, Div. of Family & Youth Servs., 46 P.3d 986, 989 (Alaska 2002)); accord Diana P. v. State, Dep’t of Health & Soc.

11
State v. Albericogreen
nm · 1993 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

11
Contreras v. Stategreen
alaska · 1986 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

11
Gentry v. Mangumgreen
wva · 1995 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

11
State v. Contrerasgreen
alaskactapp · 1983 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

11
Craddock v. Watsongreen
wva · 1996 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

11
Pulakis v. Stategreen
alaska · 1970 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

11
Taylor v. Stategreen
oklacrimapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999The Court did not address the potential for inconsistency under an abuse of discretion standard or the possibility of a hybrid standard of review. [15] See Faigman et al., supra note 4, at 1822 (discussing the smoking/lung cancer example). [16] 889 P.2d 319 (Okla.Crim.App.1995).

1999See Faigman et al., supra note 4, at 1822 (discussing the smokingdung cancer example). . 889 P.2d 319 (Okla.Crim.App.1995).

11
Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine Companygreen
or · 1974 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
2 sentences

1979See Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Co., 269 Or. 485 , 525 P.2d 1033 (1974); cf. Seattle-First Nat’I Bank v. Tabert, 86 Wash.2d 145 , 542 P.2d 774 (1975) (a hybrid test involving some elements of risk/utility analysis). .

1979See Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Co., 269 Or. 485 , 525 P.2d 1033 (1974); cf. Seattle-First Nat’I Bank v. Tabert, 86 Wash.2d 145 , 542 P.2d 774 (1975) (a hybrid test involving some elements of risk/utility analysis). .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
General Electric Co. v. Joiner green
scotus · 1997
2 sentences

2019Circuits, and citing General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997)). 61 Id. at 404 (Fabe, J., dissenting). 62 Id.

1999A few states have cited the Supreme Court's decision in General Electric v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 , 118 S.Ct. 512 , 139 L.Ed.2d 508 (1997), for the proposition that Daubert rulings should be reviewed only for abuse of discretion.

21999–2019
Schaub v. K & L DISTRIBUTORS, INC. green
alaska · 2005
2 sentences

2016Schaub, 115 P.3d at 565 . 6 .

2016Schaub, 115 P.3d at 565 . 6 Healy Lake Vill. v. Mt.

22016–2016
State v. Coon green
alaska · 1999
1 sentence

2019Otherwise, inconsistent jury verdicts, widely disparate compensation for similar injuries, and erroneous criminal verdicts will continue to erode public confidence in our justice system.”62 Justice Fabe explained that “[t]he reliability of scientific evidence does not change from one case to the next; a scientific method is either reliable or unreliable.”63 For that reason, her dissent advocated reviewing “the question of the validity of scientific information” de novo, while reviewing for abuse of discretion “a trial judge’s assessment of the competency of a particular expert witness to rende

12019–2019
State v. Alberico green
nm · 1993
1 sentence

1999See id. [17] Taylor, 889 P.2d at 332 (footnote omitted). [18] 197 W.Va. 62 , 475 S.E.2d 62 (1996). [19] Id. at 67, 475 S.E.2d 62 (quoting Gentry v. Mangum, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171, 174 (1995)). [20] 476 P.2d 474 (Alaska 1970). [21] 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App.1983), rev'd on other grounds, 718 P.2d 129 (Alaska 1986). [22] See Pulakis, 476 P.2d at 479 (polygraph examinations); Contreras, 674 P.2d at 799 (hypnosis). [23] Op. at 398. [24] Op. at 398-399 (quoting 116 N.M. 156 , 861 P.2d 192 (1993)). [25] Id. (quoting 861 P.2d at 205). [26] Indeed, the Alberico court itself noted that, with res

11999–1999
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. green
scotus · 1993
2 sentences

1999In a case involving scientific evidence, evidentiary reliability will be based upon scientific validity. 509 U.S. at 590 n. 9, 113 S.Ct. 2786 . [4] Several legal commentators have suggested such a hybrid standard of review.

1999In a case involving scientific evidence, evidentiary reliability will be based upon scientific validity. 509 U.S. at 590 n. 9, 113 S.Ct. 2786 . [4] Several legal commentators have suggested such a hybrid standard of review.

11999–1999
Clary v. Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc. green
alaska · 1969
2 sentences

1979Clary v. Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc., 454 P.2d 244 (Alaska 1969).

1979Corp., 13 Ariz. App. 305 , 475 P.2d 964 (1970). [24] See Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Co., 269 Or. 485 , 525 P.2d 1033 (1974); cf. Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Tabert, 86 Wash.2d 145 , 542 P.2d 774 (1975) (a hybrid test involving some elements of risk/utility analysis). [25] Clary v. Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc., 454 P.2d 244 (Alaska 1969).

11979–1979
Lunt v. Brady Manufacturing Corp. green
arizctapp · 1970
2 sentences

1979Corp., 13 Ariz. App. 305 , 475 P.2d 964 (1970). [24] See Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Co., 269 Or. 485 , 525 P.2d 1033 (1974); cf. Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Tabert, 86 Wash.2d 145 , 542 P.2d 774 (1975) (a hybrid test involving some elements of risk/utility analysis). [25] Clary v. Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc., 454 P.2d 244 (Alaska 1969).

1979Corp., 13 Ariz. App. 305 , 475 P.2d 964 (1970). [24] See Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Co., 269 Or. 485 , 525 P.2d 1033 (1974); cf. Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Tabert, 86 Wash.2d 145 , 542 P.2d 774 (1975) (a hybrid test involving some elements of risk/utility analysis). [25] Clary v. Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc., 454 P.2d 244 (Alaska 1969).

11979–1979
Seattle-First National Bank v. Tabert green
wash · 1975
2 sentences

1979See Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Co., 269 Or. 485 , 525 P.2d 1033 (1974); cf. Seattle-First Nat’I Bank v. Tabert, 86 Wash.2d 145 , 542 P.2d 774 (1975) (a hybrid test involving some elements of risk/utility analysis). .

1979See Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Co., 269 Or. 485 , 525 P.2d 1033 (1974); cf. Seattle-First Nat’I Bank v. Tabert, 86 Wash.2d 145 , 542 P.2d 774 (1975) (a hybrid test involving some elements of risk/utility analysis). .

11979–1979
Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. green
cal · 1963
2 sentences

1979As we mentioned earlier in this opinion, in Clary we announced that we would follow the strict liability test articulated by the California Supreme Court in Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, 59 Cal.2d 57 , 27 Cal. Rptr. 697 , 377 P.2d 897 (1962): "A manufacturer is strictly liable in tort when an article he places on the market, knowing that it is to be used without inspection for defects, proves to have a defect that causes injury to a human being." Clary, supra at 247 , quoting Greenman, supra 27 Cal. Rptr. at 700 , 377 P.2d at 900 .

1979As we mentioned earlier in this opinion, in Clary we announced that we would follow the strict liability test articulated by the California Supreme Court in Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, 59 Cal.2d 57 , 27 Cal. Rptr. 697 , 377 P.2d 897 (1962): "A manufacturer is strictly liable in tort when an article he places on the market, knowing that it is to be used without inspection for defects, proves to have a defect that causes injury to a human being." Clary, supra at 247 , quoting Greenman, supra 27 Cal. Rptr. at 700 , 377 P.2d at 900 .

11979–1979

Where else courts name it

TX 111 (1994–2026) CA 86 (1977–2026) IL 20 (1981–2026) FL 20 (1977–2025) OH 12 (1999–2023) NM 10 (1991–2017) NJ 10 (1995–2023) CT 7 (1954–2024) MI 7 (2006–2021) PA 6 (1984–2022) IA 6 (2010–2022) AK 6 (1979–2019) WI 6 (2015–2024) IN 5 (1980–2001) WA 5 (1993–2011) MD 4 (1971–2010) NY 4 (1980–2020) MN 4 (2004–2012) VA 3 (2007–2021) MS 3 (1977–2025) UT 3 (1996–2019) AZ 3 (1994–2006) CO 3 (2010–2018) DE 2 (2018–2018) ID 2 (1983–1993) TN 2 (1996–1998) NV 2 (2011–2019) RI 2 (2006–2020) LA 2 (1996–2000) GA 2 (2019–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check