Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1943–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.green2 sentences1989See Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc., 187 Conn. 544, 559 , 447 A.2d 406 (1982); Zaist v. Olson, 154 Conn. 563, 573-74 , 227 A.2d 552 (1967). 1989See Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc., 187 Conn. 544, 559 , 447 A.2d 406 (1982); Zaist v. Olson, 154 Conn. 563, 573-74 , 227 A.2d 552 (1967). | 1 | 1 |
Kay v. Biggsgreen2 sentences1982See Kay v. Biggs, 13 Ariz. App. 172, 175-76 , 475 P.2d 1 (1970); Nechtow v. Brown, 369 Mich. 460, 462 , 120 N.W.2d 251 (1963); Booten v. Peterson, 47 Wash. 2d 565, 568-69 , 288 P.2d 1084 (1955); Howard v. Kunto, 3 Wash. App. 393, 397-98 , 477 P.2d 210 (1970); Burkhardt v. Smith, 17 Wis. 2d 132, 139 , 115 N.W.2d 540 (1962); annot., 24 A.L.R.2d 632 § 4; 3 Am. 1982See Kay v. Biggs, 13 Ariz. App. 172, 175-76 , 475 P.2d 1 (1970); Nechtow v. Brown, 369 Mich. 460, 462 , 120 N.W.2d 251 (1963); Booten v. Peterson, 47 Wash. 2d 565, 568-69 , 288 P.2d 1084 (1955); Howard v. Kunto, 3 Wash. App. 393, 397-98 , 477 P.2d 210 (1970); Burkhardt v. Smith, 17 Wis. 2d 132, 139 , 115 N.W.2d 540 (1962); annot., 24 A.L.R.2d 632 § 4; 3 Am. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Town of Farmington v. Dowling
green
1 sentence2003“It is a reasonable exercise of judicial discretion to exclude . . . evidence the relevancy of which appears to be so slight and inconsequential that to admit it would distract attention which should be concentrated on vital issues of the case.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Crowley, 22 Conn. App. 557, 560 , 578 A.2d 157 (evidence of officer’s dislike for defendant found irrelevant), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 816 , 580 A.2d 62 (1990). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Buell
green
1 sentence2003“It is a reasonable exercise of judicial discretion to exclude . . . evidence the relevancy of which appears to be so slight and inconsequential that to admit it would distract attention which should be concentrated on vital issues of the case.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Crowley, 22 Conn. App. 557, 560 , 578 A.2d 157 (evidence of officer’s dislike for defendant found irrelevant), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 816 , 580 A.2d 62 (1990). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Crowley
neutral
2 sentences2003“It is a reasonable exercise of judicial discretion to exclude . . . evidence the relevancy of which appears to be so slight and inconsequential that to admit it would distract attention which should be concentrated on vital issues of the case.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Crowley, 22 Conn. App. 557, 560 , 578 A.2d 157 (evidence of officer’s dislike for defendant found irrelevant), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 816 , 580 A.2d 62 (1990). 2003“It is a reasonable exercise of judicial discretion to exclude . . . evidence the relevancy of which appears to be so slight and inconsequential that to admit it would distract attention which should be concentrated on vital issues of the case.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Crowley, 22 Conn. App. 557, 560 , 578 A.2d 157 (evidence of officer’s dislike for defendant found irrelevant), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 816 , 580 A.2d 62 (1990). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Perodeau v. City of Hartford
green
2 sentences2002"Parsons stands for the proposition that a wrongful termination is not, in and of itself, a sufficient basis for a claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress." Perodeau v. Hartford , 259 Conn. 729 , 750 , 792 A.2d 752 (2002). 2002"Parsons stands for the proposition that a wrongful termination is not, in and of itself, a sufficient basis for a claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress." Perodeau v. Hartford , 259 Conn. 729 , 750 , 792 A.2d 752 (2002). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Banks v. Vito
green
1 sentence1999Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Zaist v. Olson
green
2 sentences1989See Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc., 187 Conn. 544, 559 , 447 A.2d 406 (1982); Zaist v. Olson, 154 Conn. 563, 573-74 , 227 A.2d 552 (1967). 1989See Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc., 187 Conn. 544, 559 , 447 A.2d 406 (1982); Zaist v. Olson, 154 Conn. 563, 573-74 , 227 A.2d 552 (1967). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Roche v. Town of Fairfield
green
2 sentences1983Sess., June, 1983, No. 83-29, § 2 (c). 3 “Regular and adverse use of property during the summer season is a sufficient basis for a claim of adverse possession.” Roche v. Fairfield, 186 Conn. 490 , 501 n.11, 442 A.2d 911 (1982). 1983Sess., June, 1983, No. 83-29, § 2 (c). 3 “Regular and adverse use of property during the summer season is a sufficient basis for a claim of adverse possession.” Roche v. Fairfield, 186 Conn. 490 , 501 n.11, 442 A.2d 911 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Booten v. Peterson
green
2 sentences1982See Kay v. Biggs, 13 Ariz. App. 172, 175-76 , 475 P.2d 1 (1970); Nechtow v. Brown, 369 Mich. 460, 462 , 120 N.W.2d 251 (1963); Booten v. Peterson, 47 Wash. 2d 565, 568-69 , 288 P.2d 1084 (1955); Howard v. Kunto, 3 Wash. App. 393, 397-98 , 477 P.2d 210 (1970); Burkhardt v. Smith, 17 Wis. 2d 132, 139 , 115 N.W.2d 540 (1962); annot., 24 A.L.R.2d 632 § 4; 3 Am. 1982See Kay v. Biggs, 13 Ariz. App. 172, 175-76 , 475 P.2d 1 (1970); Nechtow v. Brown, 369 Mich. 460, 462 , 120 N.W.2d 251 (1963); Booten v. Peterson, 47 Wash. 2d 565, 568-69 , 288 P.2d 1084 (1955); Howard v. Kunto, 3 Wash. App. 393, 397-98 , 477 P.2d 210 (1970); Burkhardt v. Smith, 17 Wis. 2d 132, 139 , 115 N.W.2d 540 (1962); annot., 24 A.L.R.2d 632 § 4; 3 Am. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Burkhardt v. Smith
green
2 sentences1982See Kay v. Biggs, 13 Ariz. App. 172, 175-76 , 475 P.2d 1 (1970); Nechtow v. Brown, 369 Mich. 460, 462 , 120 N.W.2d 251 (1963); Booten v. Peterson, 47 Wash. 2d 565, 568-69 , 288 P.2d 1084 (1955); Howard v. Kunto, 3 Wash. App. 393, 397-98 , 477 P.2d 210 (1970); Burkhardt v. Smith, 17 Wis. 2d 132, 139 , 115 N.W.2d 540 (1962); annot., 24 A.L.R.2d 632 § 4; 3 Am. 1982See Kay v. Biggs, 13 Ariz. App. 172, 175-76 , 475 P.2d 1 (1970); Nechtow v. Brown, 369 Mich. 460, 462 , 120 N.W.2d 251 (1963); Booten v. Peterson, 47 Wash. 2d 565, 568-69 , 288 P.2d 1084 (1955); Howard v. Kunto, 3 Wash. App. 393, 397-98 , 477 P.2d 210 (1970); Burkhardt v. Smith, 17 Wis. 2d 132, 139 , 115 N.W.2d 540 (1962); annot., 24 A.L.R.2d 632 § 4; 3 Am. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Howard v. Kunto
green
2 sentences1982See Kay v. Biggs, 13 Ariz. App. 172, 175-76 , 475 P.2d 1 (1970); Nechtow v. Brown, 369 Mich. 460, 462 , 120 N.W.2d 251 (1963); Booten v. Peterson, 47 Wash. 2d 565, 568-69 , 288 P.2d 1084 (1955); Howard v. Kunto, 3 Wash. App. 393, 397-98 , 477 P.2d 210 (1970); Burkhardt v. Smith, 17 Wis. 2d 132, 139 , 115 N.W.2d 540 (1962); annot., 24 A.L.R.2d 632 § 4; 3 Am. 1982See Kay v. Biggs, 13 Ariz. App. 172, 175-76 , 475 P.2d 1 (1970); Nechtow v. Brown, 369 Mich. 460, 462 , 120 N.W.2d 251 (1963); Booten v. Peterson, 47 Wash. 2d 565, 568-69 , 288 P.2d 1084 (1955); Howard v. Kunto, 3 Wash. App. 393, 397-98 , 477 P.2d 210 (1970); Burkhardt v. Smith, 17 Wis. 2d 132, 139 , 115 N.W.2d 540 (1962); annot., 24 A.L.R.2d 632 § 4; 3 Am. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Nechtow v. Brown
green
2 sentences1982See Kay v. Biggs, 13 Ariz. App. 172, 175-76 , 475 P.2d 1 (1970); Nechtow v. Brown, 369 Mich. 460, 462 , 120 N.W.2d 251 (1963); Booten v. Peterson, 47 Wash. 2d 565, 568-69 , 288 P.2d 1084 (1955); Howard v. Kunto, 3 Wash. App. 393, 397-98 , 477 P.2d 210 (1970); Burkhardt v. Smith, 17 Wis. 2d 132, 139 , 115 N.W.2d 540 (1962); annot., 24 A.L.R.2d 632 § 4; 3 Am. 1982See Kay v. Biggs, 13 Ariz. App. 172, 175-76 , 475 P.2d 1 (1970); Nechtow v. Brown, 369 Mich. 460, 462 , 120 N.W.2d 251 (1963); Booten v. Peterson, 47 Wash. 2d 565, 568-69 , 288 P.2d 1084 (1955); Howard v. Kunto, 3 Wash. App. 393, 397-98 , 477 P.2d 210 (1970); Burkhardt v. Smith, 17 Wis. 2d 132, 139 , 115 N.W.2d 540 (1962); annot., 24 A.L.R.2d 632 § 4; 3 Am. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Butler v. Hyperion Theatre Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences1943Butler v. Hyperion Theatre Co., Inc., 100 Conn. 551, 559 , 124 Atl. 220 ; DeAntonio v. New Haven Dairy Co., 105 Conn. 663, 668 , 136 Atl. 567 ; Stevens v. Neligon, 116 Conn. 307, 311 , 164 Atl. 661 . 1943Butler v. Hyperion Theatre Co., Inc., 100 Conn. 551, 559 , 124 Atl. 220 ; DeAntonio v. New Haven Dairy Co., 105 Conn. 663, 668 , 136 Atl. 567 ; Stevens v. Neligon, 116 Conn. 307, 311 , 164 Atl. 661 . | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Stevens v. Neligon
green
2 sentences1943Butler v. Hyperion Theatre Co., Inc., 100 Conn. 551, 559 , 124 Atl. 220 ; DeAntonio v. New Haven Dairy Co., 105 Conn. 663, 668 , 136 Atl. 567 ; Stevens v. Neligon, 116 Conn. 307, 311 , 164 Atl. 661 . 1943Butler v. Hyperion Theatre Co., Inc., 100 Conn. 551, 559 , 124 Atl. 220 ; DeAntonio v. New Haven Dairy Co., 105 Conn. 663, 668 , 136 Atl. 567 ; Stevens v. Neligon, 116 Conn. 307, 311 , 164 Atl. 661 . | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Deantonio v. New Haven Dairy Co.
green
2 sentences1943Butler v. Hyperion Theatre Co., Inc., 100 Conn. 551, 559 , 124 Atl. 220 ; DeAntonio v. New Haven Dairy Co., 105 Conn. 663, 668 , 136 Atl. 567 ; Stevens v. Neligon, 116 Conn. 307, 311 , 164 Atl. 661 . 1943Butler v. Hyperion Theatre Co., Inc., 100 Conn. 551, 559 , 124 Atl. 220 ; DeAntonio v. New Haven Dairy Co., 105 Conn. 663, 668 , 136 Atl. 567 ; Stevens v. Neligon, 116 Conn. 307, 311 , 164 Atl. 661 . | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.