Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Manley v. Stategreen1 sentence2013In contrast, in Manley v. State, 605 So.2d 1327, 1328 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), this court affirmed the denial an ineffective assistance claim based on counsel’s failure to file a motion for new trial, holding that it was “not convinced of any strong likelihood a new trial would have been ordered.” We conclude that defense counsel’s failure to file a motion for new trial in this case constituted deficient performance. | 1 | 1 |
McKean v. Kloeppel Hotels, Inc.green1 sentence2003See McKean v. Kloeppel Hotels, Inc., 171 So.2d 552 (D.C.A.lst 1965). | 1 | 1 |
Fournier v. Lottgreen1 sentence1979See Fournier v. Lott, 145 So.2d 885 (Fla.3d DCA 1962), and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Champion v. Rakes
green
2 sentences1997NOTES [1] No amendment was ever made to the complaint, and no amended complaint was ever filed. [2] In Champion v. Rakes, 155 Ga.App. 134 , 270 S.E.2d 272 (1980), a Georgia appellate court was "confronted with a question of whether a court which had no jurisdiction of the subject matter when suit was filed can obtain jurisdiction by rendering a judgment which is within such court's jurisdiction." In a persuasive analysis of the problem, the court answered the question in the negative. 1997NOTES [1] No amendment was ever made to the complaint, and no amended complaint was ever filed. [2] In Champion v. Rakes, 155 Ga.App. 134 , 270 S.E.2d 272 (1980), a Georgia appellate court was "confronted with a question of whether a court which had no jurisdiction of the subject matter when suit was filed can obtain jurisdiction by rendering a judgment which is within such court's jurisdiction." In a persuasive analysis of the problem, the court answered the question in the negative. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Barclays Bank, S.A. v. Tsakos
green
1 sentence1995Barclays Bank S.A. v. Tsakos, 543 A.2d at 802 so holds upon a complete and persuasive analysis of the problem which we adopt for ourselves. *779 2. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
ST. v. Falls Chase Spec. Taxing Dist.
green
2 sentences1986See 2 Cooper, State Administrative Law, 577 (1965); Department of Environmental Regulation v. Falls Chase Special Taxing District, 424 So.2d 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), review denied, 436 So.2d 98 (Fla. 1983). 1986State, Dept. of Environmental Regulation v. Falls Chase Special Taxing District, 424 So.2d 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Williams v. Kleaveland
green
1 sentence1985Our approach is consistent with the "purpose based approach" which is suggested by the foregoing article to resolve antitrust cases of this kind and which the authors believe would "promote important public policies" and yet at the same time "serve the central antitrust policies." Kissam, supra, at pp. 659-63, 670. "[P]roof that Defendants acted for the primary purpose of maintaining high quality patient care is a persuasive defense to an antitrust claim." Williams v. Kleaveland, 534 F. Supp. at 919 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.