persuasive analysis in Connecticut

2024On appeal, held that the trial court improperly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s municipal tax appeal on the basis that the plaintiff’s petition to the board was untimely: in accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision in Brennan v. Fairfield ( 255 Conn. 693 ), which analyzed the statutory deadline for a claim under the municipal defective highway statute (§ 13a-149), this court similarly determined that the legislature did not intend for a taxpayer to have a shorter time period to file its petition to a town’s board simply because the statutory deadl

2024On appeal, held that the trial court improperly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s municipal tax appeal on the basis that the plaintiff’s petition to the board was untimely: in accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision in Brennan v. Fairfield ( 255 Conn. 693 ), which analyzed the statutory deadline for a claim under the municipal defective highway statute (§ 13a-149), this court similarly determined that the legislature did not intend for a taxpayer to have a shorter time period to file its petition to a town’s board simply because the statutory deadl

2006If, after examining such text and considering such relationship, the meaning of such text is plain and unambiguous and does not yield absurd or unworkable results, extratextual evidence of the meaning of the statute shall not be considered.” Neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants, however, have raised a persuasive claim that the statutory provisions at issue in the present case are plain and unambiguous as applied to the facts of the case. 21 General Statutes § 52-577 provides: “No action founded upon a tort shall be brought but within three years from 1he date of the act or omission compla

2006If, after examining such text and considering such relationship, the meaning of such text is plain and unambiguous and does not yield absurd or unworkable results, extratextual evidence of the meaning of the statute shall not be considered.” Neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants, however, have raised a persuasive claim that the statutory provisions at issue in the present case are plain and unambiguous as applied to the facts of the case. 21 General Statutes § 52-577 provides: “No action founded upon a tort shall be brought but within three years from 1he date of the act or omission compla

2006If, after examining such text and considering such relationship, the meaning of such text is plain and unambiguous and does not yield absurd or unworkable results, extratextual evidence of the meaning of the statute shall not be considered.” Neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants, however, have raised a persuasive claim that the statutory provisions at issue in the present case are plain and unambiguous as applied to the facts of the case. 21 General Statutes § 52-577 provides: “No action founded upon a tort shall be brought but within three years from 1he date of the act or omission compla

2004Otherwise, we will continue to follow the persuasive analysis of the United States Supreme Court.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 470-71 n.12.

1999This court finds persuasive the analysis set forth by the Delaware Supreme Court in City Investing Company Liquidating Trust v. Continental Casualty Co. , supra, 624 A.2d 1191 , and concludes that a question of fact remains as to whether the liquidating trust, PSB Associates Liquidating TRA, represents PSB's continued existence. 6 Fraudulent Concealment General Statutes § 52-595 provides for the tolling of applicable statutes of limitation where the defendant has fraudulently concealed from the plaintiff the existence of a cause of action, in favor of the plaintiff, against the defendant. 7 In

1998State v. Miller, supra, 222-23.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Adams, 38 Conn. App. 643, 655 , 662 A.2d 1327 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908 , 665 A.2d 902 (1995).

1998State v. Miller, supra, 222-23.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Adams, 38 Conn. App. 643, 655 , 662 A.2d 1327 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908 , 665 A.2d 902 (1995).

1998State v. Miller, supra, 222-23.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Adams, 38 Conn. App. 643, 655 , 662 A.2d 1327 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908 , 665 A.2d 902 (1995).

1998State v. Miller, supra, 222-23.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Adams, 38 Conn. App. 643, 655 , 662 A.2d 1327 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908 , 665 A.2d 902 (1995).

1995In the opinion of this court, the most persuasive analysis was provided by the Michigan Bankruptcy court in Matter of CT Page 13012 Cliff's Ridge Skiing Corp., 123 B.R. 753 (Bkrtcy.