7 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In the Matter of B.B., Alleged to Be Seriously Mentally Impaired, B.B.green2 sentences2025See id. at 431 . 2025See B.B., 826 N.W.2d at 431 . | 3 | 4 |
Padilla v. Kentuckygreen2 sentences2021Id. at 390 , 130 S. Ct. at 1495 (Scalia, J., dissenting). 2021Id. at 390 , 130 S. Ct. at 1495 (Scalia, J., dissenting). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Ramirezgreen1 sentence2011State v. Ramirez, 636 N.W.2d 740, 746 (Iowa 2001) (declining the opportunity to overrule Mott and continuing to adhere to the collateral-consequences rule). 4 Shortly after the Ramirez case was decided, Iowa’s rules of criminal procedure concerning guilty pleas were amended to require courts to inform defendants “[t]hat a criminal conviction, deferred judgment, or deferred sentence may affect a defendant’s status under federal immigration laws.” Iowa R.Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.