Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1914–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Youel v. Youelgreen1 sentence1974See also Youel v. Youel, Iowa, 218 N.W.2d 449 (filed this day). | 1 | 1 |
Leppo v. City of Petalumagreen2 sentences1973See also Leppo v. City of Petaluma, 20 Cal.App.3d 711 , 97 Cal.Rptr. 840 (1971); Rowland v. State, 129 Fla. 662 , 176 So. 545 (1937); Shaffer v. City of Atlanta, 223 Ga. 249 , 154 S.E.2d 241 (1967); Annot., 14 A.L.R.2d 73 , 82. 1973See also Leppo v. City of Petaluma, 20 Cal.App.3d 711 , 97 Cal.Rptr. 840 (1971); Rowland v. State, 129 Fla. 662 , 176 So. 545 (1937); Shaffer v. City of Atlanta, 223 Ga. 249 , 154 S.E.2d 241 (1967); Annot., 14 A.L.R.2d 73 , 82. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Appeal Board v. District Court
green
2 sentences2002We held the “appeal board in fixing the time and place of hearing, serving the notices thereof, and causing its agent to conduct the hearing at Council Bluffs constitutes a very definite act ... in Pottawattamie County.” Id. at 300 , 280 N.W. at 527 . 2002We held the “appeal board in fixing the time and place of hearing, serving the notices thereof, and causing its agent to conduct the hearing at Council Bluffs constitutes a very definite act ... in Pottawattamie County.” Id. at 300 , 280 N.W. at 527 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Parrish v. Denato
green
2 sentences1979We reason that if an attorney asking a fee is entitled to a hearing at which he or she may offer evidence to establish the value of his Or her services, see, e. g., Soldat, 283 N.W.2d at 498 ; Parrish, 262 N.W.2d at 286 , the county, which must pay the fee allowed, ought also to be accorded the opportunity to participate in the hearing. 1979We reason that if an attorney asking a fee is entitled to a hearing at which he or she may offer evidence to establish the value of his or her services, see, e. g., Soldat, 283 N.W.2d at 498 ; Parrish, 262 N.W.2d at 286 , the county, which must pay the fee allowed, ought also to be accorded the opportunity to participate in the hearing. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Soldat v. Iowa District Court for Emmet County
green
2 sentences1979We reason that if an attorney asking a fee is entitled to a hearing at which he or she may offer evidence to establish the value of his Or her services, see, e. g., Soldat, 283 N.W.2d at 498 ; Parrish, 262 N.W.2d at 286 , the county, which must pay the fee allowed, ought also to be accorded the opportunity to participate in the hearing. 1979We reason that if an attorney asking a fee is entitled to a hearing at which he or she may offer evidence to establish the value of his or her services, see, e. g., Soldat, 283 N.W.2d at 498 ; Parrish, 262 N.W.2d at 286 , the county, which must pay the fee allowed, ought also to be accorded the opportunity to participate in the hearing. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Furey v. Crawford County
green
2 sentences1979In Furey , after discussing the manner of making and supporting a motion for attorney’s compensation, this court stated: “Trial court should fix a time and place of hearing on the motion, and specify the notice to be given the county attorney.” 208 N.W.2d at 18 . 1979In Furey , after discussing the manner of making and supporting a motion for attorney's compensation, this court stated: "Trial court should fix a time and place of hearing on the motion, and specify the notice to be given the county attorney." 208 N.W.2d at 18 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Rowland v. State Ex Rel. Martin
green
2 sentences1973See also Leppo v. City of Petaluma, 20 Cal.App.3d 711 , 97 Cal.Rptr. 840 (1971); Rowland v. State, 129 Fla. 662 , 176 So. 545 (1937); Shaffer v. City of Atlanta, 223 Ga. 249 , 154 S.E.2d 241 (1967); Annot., 14 A.L.R.2d 73 , 82. 1973See also Leppo v. City of Petaluma, 20 Cal.App.3d 711 , 97 Cal.Rptr. 840 (1971); Rowland v. State, 129 Fla. 662 , 176 So. 545 (1937); Shaffer v. City of Atlanta, 223 Ga. 249 , 154 S.E.2d 241 (1967); Annot., 14 A.L.R.2d 73 , 82. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Shaffer v. City of Atlanta
neutral
2 sentences1973See also Leppo v. City of Petaluma, 20 Cal.App.3d 711 , 97 Cal.Rptr. 840 (1971); Rowland v. State, 129 Fla. 662 , 176 So. 545 (1937); Shaffer v. City of Atlanta, 223 Ga. 249 , 154 S.E.2d 241 (1967); Annot., 14 A.L.R.2d 73 , 82. 1973See also Leppo v. City of Petaluma, 20 Cal.App.3d 711 , 97 Cal.Rptr. 840 (1971); Rowland v. State, 129 Fla. 662 , 176 So. 545 (1937); Shaffer v. City of Atlanta, 223 Ga. 249 , 154 S.E.2d 241 (1967); Annot., 14 A.L.R.2d 73 , 82. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
State ex rel. Cox v. Consolidated Independent School District
neutral
1 sentence1960Cox v. Consolidated Independent School District, 246 Iowa. 566, 573, 68 N.W.2d 305, 309 , discussing the Moulton case, supra, this court said: “We held the duty imposed upon the county superintendent was mandatory but that his failure to act within the statutory time by giving to an appealing objector notice of the time and place of hearing the appeal did not operate as a limitation upon his ‘jurisdiction and authority * * * to cause a new notice to be published, in order that a fatal defect in the subsequent procedure may be corrected.’ ” It has been settled in this state that the so-called a | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Ditto v. Edwards
neutral
2 sentences1938We refer to tbe case of Ditto v. Edwards, 224 Iowa 243 , 276 N. W. 20 , in wbicb action the application for an extension was filed prior to tbe expiration of tbe statutory one year period of redemption, and wherein, on tbe last day of sucb period an order was made providing for bearing upon said application, and providing for notice to be given of said bearing, but wherein no notice of said bearing was ever given. 1938We refer to tbe case of Ditto v. Edwards, 224 Iowa 243 , 276 N. W. 20 , in wbicb action the application for an extension was filed prior to tbe expiration of tbe statutory one year period of redemption, and wherein, on tbe last day of sucb period an order was made providing for bearing upon said application, and providing for notice to be given of said bearing, but wherein no notice of said bearing was ever given. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
King v. Portland City
green
2 sentences1914Ross v. Supervisors, 128 Iowa, 438 ; King v. Portland, 184 U. S. 61 (22 Sup. Ct. 290, 46 L. 1914Ross v. Supervisors, 128 Iowa, 438 ; King v. Portland, 184 U. S. 61 (22 Sup. Ct. 290, 46 L. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.