Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1913–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wortel v. Somerset Industries, Inc.
green
2 sentences2005Under the consumer-expectation test, the open and obvious nature of a danger would bar recovery where the injury was the result of the inherent properties of the product which were obvious to anyone who came into contact with it. 345 Ill.App.3d at 466 , 280 Ill.Dec. 957 , 803 N.E.2d 187 , citing Wortel, 331 Ill.App.3d at 901 , 264 Ill.Dec. 515 , 770 N.E.2d 1211 . 2005Under the consumer-expectation test, the open and obvious nature of a danger would bar recovery where the injury was the result of the inherent properties of the product which were obvious to anyone who came into contact with it. 345 Ill.App.3d at 466 , 280 Ill.Dec. 957 , 803 N.E.2d 187 , citing Wortel, 331 Ill.App.3d at 901 , 264 Ill.Dec. 515 , 770 N.E.2d 1211 . | 4 | 2003–2005 |
Blue v. Environmental Engineering, Inc.
green
2 sentences2007Accordingly, because the open and obvious nature of the danger created by sticking a foot in a compactor is not an absolute bar to the plaintiff's recovery, "the interrogatory was improper, as it did not resolve an ultimate issue in the case and was not necessarily inconsistent." Blue, 215 Ill.2d at 113 , 293 Ill.Dec. 630 , 828 N.E.2d 1128 . 2007Accordingly, because the open and obvious nature of the danger created by sticking a foot in a compactor is not an absolute bar to the plaintiff's recovery, "the interrogatory was improper, as it did not resolve an ultimate issue in the case and was not necessarily inconsistent." Blue, 215 Ill.2d at 113 , 293 Ill.Dec. 630 , 828 N.E.2d 1128 . | 2 | 2006–2007 |
Blue v. Environmental Engineering, Inc.
green
2 sentences2005Under the consumer-expectation test, the open and obvious nature of a danger would bar recovery where the injury was the result of the inherent properties of the product which were obvious to anyone who came into contact with it. 345 Ill. 2005Under the consumer-expectation test, the open and obvious nature of a danger would bar recovery where the injury was the result of the inherent properties of the product which were obvious to anyone who came into contact with it. 345 Ill.App.3d at 466 , 280 Ill.Dec. 957 , 803 N.E.2d 187 , citing Wortel, 331 Ill.App.3d at 901 , 264 Ill.Dec. 515 , 770 N.E.2d 1211 . | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Lamkin v. Towner
green
2 sentences2005But in 1990, this court decided Lamkin v. Towner, 138 Ill.2d 510 , 150 Ill.Dec. 562 , 563 N.E.2d 449 (1990), which held that a plaintiff may demonstrate a manufacturer's strict liability for defective design by an alternative method, known as the risk-utility test. 2005But in 1990, this court decided Lamkin v. Towner, 138 Ill.2d 510 , 150 Ill.Dec. 562 , 563 N.E.2d 449 (1990), which held that a plaintiff may demonstrate a manufacturer's strict liability for defective design by an alternative method, known as the risk-utility test. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Catlett v. Young
neutral
1 sentence1913Catlett v. Young, 143 Ill. 74 ; Carterville Coal Co. v. Abbott, 181 Ill. 495 ; Spring Valley Coal Co. v. Patting, 210 Ill. 342 ; Waschow v. Kelly Coal Co., 245 Ill. 516 . | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Carterville Coal Co. v. Abbott
neutral
1 sentence1913Catlett v. Young, 143 Ill. 74 ; Carterville Coal Co. v. Abbott, 181 Ill. 495 ; Spring Valley Coal Co. v. Patting, 210 Ill. 342 ; Waschow v. Kelly Coal Co., 245 Ill. 516 . | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Spring Valley Coal Co. v. Patting
neutral
1 sentence1913Catlett v. Young, 143 Ill. 74 ; Carterville Coal Co. v. Abbott, 181 Ill. 495 ; Spring Valley Coal Co. v. Patting, 210 Ill. 342 ; Waschow v. Kelly Coal Co., 245 Ill. 516 . | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Waschow v. Kelly Coal Co.
neutral
1 sentence1913Catlett v. Young, 143 Ill. 74 ; Carterville Coal Co. v. Abbott, 181 Ill. 495 ; Spring Valley Coal Co. v. Patting, 210 Ill. 342 ; Waschow v. Kelly Coal Co., 245 Ill. 516 . | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Streeter v. Western Wheeled Scraper Co.
green
1 sentence1913The Supreme Court has held in the case of Streeter v. Western Wheeled Scraper Co., 254 Ill. 244 , that the defense of assumed risk is not a bar to a laborer’s right to recover damages for a violation of the Factory Act, which is an act included in the same chapter as the act in question, under the general head of “Employment.” The Factory Act gave no right of action to an employe injured by reason of a violation thereof, and, yet, it was held in that case that that statute should receive a similar construction in regard to the defense of assumed risk as the Mining Act had received. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.