reverse rule (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

reverse rule in Illinois

7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1890–1994 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Ryan v. Sanford neutral
· 1890
2 sentences

1907Ryan v. Sanford, 133 Ill. 291 ; Marvin v. Collins, 98 id. 510, 511.

1907Ryan v. Sanford, 133 Ill. 291 ; Marvin v. Collins, 98 id. 510, 511. ’ ’ In Standish v. Musgrove there was no finding of facts.

31906–1907
Ingle v. Hospital Sisters Health System green
illappct · 1986
1 sentence

1994In Ingle v. Hospital Sisters Health System (1986), 141 Ill.

11994–1994
Chicago Daily News, Inc. v. Kohler green
ill · 1935
1 sentence

1957(Chicago Daily News, Inc. v. Kohler, 360 Ill. 351 .) To sustain appellees’ view, the reverse of the rule would have to be invoked.

11957–1957
New Domain Oil & Gas Co. v. McKinney green
kyctapp · 1920
1 sentence

1937The reasoning and logic adopted by the court of appeals in New Domain Oil & Gas Co. v. McKinney, 188 Ky. 183 in announcing the measure of damages as between cotenants is equally applicable to a lessee of a cotenant who entered upon the premises” under the circumstances of this case.

11937–1937
Gray v. St. John neutral
· 1864
1 sentence

1890John, 35 Ill. 222 ; Holbrook v. 1st Nat’l Bank, 10 Ill.

11890–1890
Holbrook v. First National Bank neutral
illappct · 1882
1 sentence

1890John, 35 Ill. 222 ; Holbrook v. 1st Nat’l Bank, 10 Ill.

11890–1890

Where else courts name it

MD 13 (1974–2026) WI 11 (1959–2026) PA 7 (1829–1975) TX 7 (1880–2025) IL 7 (1890–1994) CA 6 (1931–2022) AL 6 (1838–1987) NY 6 (1894–2013) FL 5 (1989–1996) IA 4 (2011–2023) LA 4 (1925–2004) NC 3 (1970–1987) IN 2 (1898–1914) WA 2 (1892–1934) KY 2 (1941–1963) UT 2 (2018–2018) OR 2 (1970–2002) SC 2 (1958–2010) MS 2 (1858–2006) ID 2 (2016–2016) AR 2 (1856–1924)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check