bad instruction in Indiana

2008Such instructions are not viewed as a whole, with this court on appeal left to determine which of the contradictory instructions the jury should reasonably have believed.” FMC Corp. v. Brown, 526 N.E.2d 719, 730 (Ind.Ct.App.1988) (quoting Deckard v. Adams, 246 Ind. 123, 127 , 203 N.E.2d 303, 306 (1965)).

2008Such instructions are not viewed as a whole, with this court on appeal left to determine which of the contradictory instructions the jury should reasonably have believed.” FMC Corp. v. Brown, 526 N.E.2d 719, 730 (Ind.Ct.App.1988) (quoting Deckard v. Adams, 246 Ind. 123, 127 , 203 N.E.2d 303, 306 (1965)).

2008Such instructions are not viewed as a whole, with this court on appeal left to determine which of the contradictory instructions the jury should reasonably have believed.” FMC Corp. v. Brown, 526 N.E.2d 719, 730 (Ind.Ct.App.1988) (quoting Deckard v. Adams, 246 Ind. 123, 127 , 203 N.E.2d 303, 306 (1965)).

2008Such instructions are not viewed as a whole, with this court on appeal left to determine which of the contradictory instructions the jury should reasonably have believed." FMC Corp. v. Brown, 526 N.E.2d 719, 730 (Ind.Ct.App.1988) (quoting Deckard v. Adams, 246 Ind. 123, 127 , 203 N.E.2d 303, 306 (1965)).

2004The Faretta court, which held that criminal defendants have a right to represent themselves, imposed the requirements of a clear, unequivocal request, and a knowing, voluntary waiver of the right to counsel, out of concern that defendants could "conduct [their] own defense ultimately to [their] own detriment." 422 U.S. at 834, 835 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 ; see also Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, 528 U.S. 152, 161 , 120 S.Ct. 684 , 145 L.Ed.2d 597 (2000) (holding there is no constitutional right to represent oneself on appeal and noting that "(olur experience has taught us

2004The Faretta court, which held that criminal defendants have a right to represent themselves, imposed the requirements of a clear, unequivocal request, and a knowing, voluntary waiver of the right to counsel, out of concern that defendants could "conduct [their] own defense ultimately to [their] own detriment." 422 U.S. at 834, 835 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 ; see also Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, 528 U.S. 152, 161 , 120 S.Ct. 684 , 145 L.Ed.2d 597 (2000) (holding there is no constitutional right to represent oneself on appeal and noting that "(olur experience has taught us

2004The Faretta court, which held that criminal defendants have a right to represent themselves, imposed the requirements of a clear, unequivocal request, and a knowing, voluntary waiver of the right to counsel, out of concern that defendants could "conduct [their] own defense ultimately to [their] own detriment." 422 U.S. at 834, 835 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 ; see also Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, 528 U.S. 152, 161 , 120 S.Ct. 684 , 145 L.Ed.2d 597 (2000) (holding there is no constitutional right to represent oneself on appeal and noting that "(olur experience has taught us

2004The Faretta court, which held that criminal defendants have a right to represent themselves, imposed the requirements of a clear, unequivocal request, and a knowing, voluntary waiver of the right to counsel, out of concern that defendants could "conduct [their] own defense ultimately to [their] own detriment." 422 U.S. at 834, 835 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 ; see also Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, 528 U.S. 152, 161 , 120 S.Ct. 684 , 145 L.Ed.2d 597 (2000) (holding there is no constitutional right to represent oneself on appeal and noting that "(olur experience has taught us

1982See, e.g., Brewer v. State, (1969) 253 Ind. 154 , 252 N.E.2d 429 ; Mundy v. State, (1966) 247 Ind. 224 , 214 N.E.2d 389 ; Harrington v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 413 N.E.2d 622 .

1982See, e.g., Brewer v. State, (1969) 253 Ind. 154 , 252 N.E.2d 429 ; Mundy v. State, (1966) 247 Ind. 224 , 214 N.E.2d 389 ; Harrington v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 413 N.E.2d 622 .