Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1977–1994 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Transamerica Insurance Company v. Michael Henrygreen2 sentences1990These two queries are part of the single question which confronted the district court: Does “the household exclusion clause in the Transamerica insurance policy issued to the Henrys contravene[ ] the stated public policy of the state of Indiana.” Id. at 390 . 1990Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Michael Henry, 904 F.2d 387, 391 (7th Cir.1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Boles
green
2 sentences1993The Boles court stated, “We fail to see in which sense the household exclusion clause contravenes public policy implicit in Ind.Code § 9-2-1-1 et seq., when the Act only requires liability insurance for injuries sustained by persons other than the insured and when the Act does not mandate insurance to be the means of proving financial responsibility.” Boles, supra, at 1101 . 1993Our supreme court upheld the validity of a household exclusion clause after analyzing a predecessor financial responsibility statute, IND.CODE 9-2-1-4 (Supp.1981), in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Boles (1985), Ind., 481 N.E.2d 1096,1101 . | 3 | 1989–1993 |
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Alexander
green
2 sentences1994Id. at 399 , 583 N.E.2d at 311 . 1994Id. at 399 , 583 N.E.2d at 311 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Henry by Next Friend Henry
green
2 sentences1993Henry, supra, 563 N.E.2d at 1266 . 1993Henry, supra, 563 N.E.2d at 1266 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Brooks v. Robinson
green
2 sentences1985The insured parties, involved in the suit which has given rise to the certification of the question now before us, argue the household exclusion clause contravenes public policy expressed, implicitly or explicitly, in Brooks v. Robinson, (1972) 259 Ind. 16 , 284 N.E.2d 794 and three motor vehicle statutes. 1985The insured parties, involved in the suit which has given rise to the certification of the question now before us, argue the household exclusion clause contravenes public policy expressed, implicitly or explicitly, in Brooks v. Robinson, (1972) 259 Ind. 16 , 284 N.E.2d 794 and three motor vehicle statutes. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Hanley
green
2 sentences1983Co. v. Hanley, (1977) 172 Ind.App. 329 , 360 N.E.2d 247 , in which we held a household exclusion clause was not an invalid restriction on uninsured motorist coverage. 1983Co. v. Hanley, (1977) 172 Ind.App. 329 , 360 N.E.2d 247 , in which we held a household exclusion clause was not an invalid restriction on uninsured motorist coverage. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Bowsher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
red
2 sentences1977In each case the court construed the applicable uninsured motorist statute. 4 In Bowsher v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (1966), 244 Ore. 549 , 419 P.2d 606 , Bowsher, the named insured, was a passenger in his own automobile which was being driven by Simpson who had no insurance. 1977In each case the court construed the applicable uninsured motorist statute. 4 In Bowsher v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (1966), 244 Ore. 549 , 419 P.2d 606 , Bowsher, the named insured, was a passenger in his own automobile which was being driven by Simpson who had no insurance. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.