Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Groves v. Taylorgreen2 sentences2011We further expanded recovery for emotional injuries in Groves v. Taylor to include certain closely related bystanders to negligent conduct. 729 N.E.2d 569, 573 (Ind.2000). 2007In this light, the Groves court cited Judge Kirsch as saying that "traumatic events can have severe, debilitating and foreseeable emotional effect even if not accompanied by physical injury, a direct impact, or a direct involvement." Id. (emphasis added). | 1 | 3 |
Ross v. Cheemagreen1 sentence2011In Ross v. Cheema, a companion case announced the same day as Con-der, we emphasized that, even though the modified impact rule removed the physical injury requirement, “direct impact is properly understood as being ‘physical’ in na *465 ture.” 716 N.E.2d 435, 437 (Ind.1999) (holding that the plaintiff did not sustain a sufficient impact by hearing a loud and frightening knocking at the door to her residence). | 1 | 1 |
Delta Airlines v. Cookgreen1 sentence2006See, e.g., Delta Airlines, 821 N.E.2d at 401 (asserting that the reasoning underlying this Court's decision to eliminate the physical injury requirement *997 under the impact rule "also supports eliminating the physical impact requirement under the modified impact rule"); Ketchmark v. N. Ind. Pub. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shuamber v. Henderson
green
2 sentences2023Id. at 456 . 2005Indeed, the reasoning underlying the court's decision to eliminate the physical injury requirement under the impact rule in Shuamber v. Henderson, 579 N.E.2d 452 (Ind.1991), has been extended to eliminate the physical impact rule under the bystander rule. | 3 | 1999–2023 |
Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Smith
green
2 sentences1989Although the general rule in Indiana requires a physical injury for a claim of emotional distress, Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Smith (1976), 171 Ind.App. 315 , 357 N.E.2d 247 , Indiana has long recognized a claim for emotional distress when accompanied by an assault or battery. 1989Although the general rule in Indiana requires a physical injury for a claim of emotional distress, Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Smith (1976), 171 Ind.App. 315 , 357 N.E.2d 247 , Indiana has long recognized a claim for emotional distress when accompanied by an assault or battery. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Kline v. Kline
green
2 sentences1989Kline v. Kline (1902), 158 Ind. 602 , 64 N.E. 9 ; Golibart v. Sullivan (1903), 30 Ind.App. 428 , 66 N.E. 188 . 1989Kline v. Kline (1902), 158 Ind. 602 , 64 N.E. 9 ; Golibart v. Sullivan (1903), 30 Ind.App. 428 , 66 N.E. 188 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Golibart v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences1989Kline v. Kline (1902), 158 Ind. 602 , 64 N.E. 9 ; Golibart v. Sullivan (1903), 30 Ind.App. 428 , 66 N.E. 188 . 1989Kline v. Kline (1902), 158 Ind. 602 , 64 N.E. 9 ; Golibart v. Sullivan (1903), 30 Ind.App. 428 , 66 N.E. 188 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.