7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Randolph Wilkins, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. St. Louis Housing Authority, Appellant/cross-Appelleegreen2 sentences2015Auth., 314 F.3d 927, 933 (8th Cir.2002) (recognizing that the Fifth, Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits have all used a reasonable-belief standard in the Title VII retaliation context). 2015Auth., 314 F.3d 927, 933 (8th Cir. 2002) (recognizing that the Fifth, Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits have all used a reasonable-belief standard in the Title VII retaliation context). | 1 | 1 |
United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Larry Risse, Appellant/cross-Appelleegreen2 sentences2009See United States v. Graham, 553 F.3d 6, 12 (1st Cir.2009), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 2419 , 173 L.Ed.2d 1323 (2009); United States v. Risse, 83 F.3d 212, 216 (8th Cir. 1996). 2009See United States v. Graham, 553 F.3d 6, 12 (1st Cir.2009), cert. denied, - U.S. --, 129 S.Ct. 2419 , 173 L.Ed.2d 1323 (2009); United States v. Risse, 83 F.3d 212, 216 (8th Cir.1996). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Silvagreen2 sentences2009See Commonwealth v. Silva, 440 Mass. 772 , 802 N.E.2d 535 , 540 n. 7 (2004) (collecting cases). . 2009See Commonwealth v. Silva, 440 Mass. 772 , 802 N.E.2d 535 , 540 n. 7 (2004) (collecting cases). . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Grahamgreen2 sentences2009See United States v. Graham, 553 F.3d 6, 12 (1st Cir.2009), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 2419 , 173 L.Ed.2d 1323 (2009); United States v. Risse, 83 F.3d 212, 216 (8th Cir. 1996). 2009See United States v. Graham, 553 F.3d 6, 12 (1st Cir.2009), cert. denied, - U.S. --, 129 S.Ct. 2419 , 173 L.Ed.2d 1323 (2009); United States v. Risse, 83 F.3d 212, 216 (8th Cir.1996). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Tolleygreen2 sentences2009See Smith v. Tolley, 960 F.Supp. 977, 985-88 (E.D.Va. 1997). 2009See Smith v. Tolley, 960 F.Supp. 977, 985-88 (E.D.Va.1997). | 1 | 1 |
Fenix v. Stategreen1 sentence2005Fenix v. State, 438 N.E.2d 1005, 1006 (Ind.Ct.App.1982) (addressing Ind. Code § 35-42-4-8 (1981 Supp.)). | 1 | 1 |
Neblett v. Stategreen1 sentence1999Nothing in subsection (e) prohibits the defense in cases involving children less than twelve (12); however, it will undoubtedly be a rare case where the facts would show that a belief that an eleven (11) year old was sixteen (16) or older was a ‘reasonable’ belief.” See Neblett v. State, 396 N.E.2d 930, 932 (Ind.Ct.App.1979) (noting that under the revised statute a reasonable belief defense is available to a child molesting defendant and that the crime is no longer a strict liability offense). | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Levinsongreen1 sentence1983See also Martin v. Levinson, (1980) Ind.App., 409 N.E.2d 1239 , where this court, in addressing a related estoppel issue in connection with a statute of limitations defense quoted with approval the following passage from an Illinois case: "'The fact that an insurer negotiates with a claimant is not conduct amounting to waiver by estoppel unless the negotiations contain statements or conduct which are calculated to lull the claimant into a reasonable belief that his claim will be settled without suit. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Burnham
green
1 sentence1993As stated in People v. Burnham, supra, 222 Cal. Rptr. at 637 : "The ... contention that we should declare, as a matter of law, the appellant's assertions [as to reasonable belief] are unreasonable is, in reality, a request that we declare the appellant's assertions to be incredible as a matter of law. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Flagler v. Wessman
green
2 sentences1980If there is evidence of such conduct which exceeds mere investigation and negotiation an issue is made for determination by the trier of facts; if not, the defense may be disposed of by the court as a matter of law.” (Citations omitted) Flagler v. Wessman (2nd Dist. 1970), 130 Ill.App.2d 491, at 494 , 263 N.E.2d 630, at 632 , as cited in Doll v. Farmers Auto. 1980If there is evidence of such conduct which exceeds mere investigation and negotiation an issue is made for determination by the trier of facts; if not, the defense may be disposed of by the court as a matter of law.” (Citations omitted) Flagler v. Wessman (2nd Dist. 1970), 130 Ill.App.2d 491, at 494 , 263 N.E.2d 630, at 632 , as cited in Doll v. Farmers Auto. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.