6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Penry v. Stategreen1 sentence2024See Penry v. State, 903 S.W.2d 715, 741 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Gonzales v. Stategreen1 sentence2020The reasonable belief standard is “employed precisely to avoid different applications of the law . . . to defendants of different races, creed, color, sex or social status.” Gonzales v. State, 689 S.W.2d 900, 903 (Tex.Crim.App. 1985). | 1 | 1 |
Rickels v. Stategreen1 sentence2013Rickels v. State, 202 S.W.3d 759, 764 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Argonaut Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.green1 sentence2000See id. at 543 . *703 KMC's position is contrary to our liberal application of the reasonable belief rule. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Steele
green
1 sentence2015E.g., Steele, 236 P.3d at 170–72 (noting but not resolving argument); State v. Jacobson, 697 N.W.2d 610 , 615–16 (Minn. 2005) (rejecting State’s argument). 17 jury a vehicle to find appellant not guilty if he thought he was a resident in reliance on the authorities. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Jacobson
green
1 sentence2015E.g., Steele, 236 P.3d at 170–72 (noting but not resolving argument); State v. Jacobson, 697 N.W.2d 610 , 615–16 (Minn. 2005) (rejecting State’s argument). 17 jury a vehicle to find appellant not guilty if he thought he was a resident in reliance on the authorities. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Keck, Mahin & Cate v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
green
2 sentences2004Id. at 703 (quoting 1 Allan D. 2004Id. at 703 (quoting 1 ALLAN D. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.