Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Illinois v. Rodriguez
green
2 sentences2019Specifically, Garnett contends that Illinois v. Rodriguez has established the reasonable belief standard for determining the permissible bounds of a search of a probationer’s belongings. 497 U.S. 177 (1990). 2019Specifically, Garnett contends that Illinois v. Rodriguez has established the reasonable belief standard for determining the permissible bounds of a search of a probationer’s belongings. 497 U.S. 177 (1990). | 3 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Barker
green
2 sentences2015In State v. Barker, 136 Idaho 728 , 40 P.3d 86 (2002), our Supreme Court considered whether a parolee who had consented to a search of his residence had apparent authority to consent to the search of a fanny pack found in the bedroom. 2015In State v. Barker, 136 Idaho 728 , 40 P.3d 86 (2002), our Supreme Court considered whether a parolee who had consented to a search of his residence had apparent authority to consent to the search of a fanny pack found in the bedroom. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
United States v. Frank Armando Cuaron
green
1 sentence1987United States v. Cuaron, supra. Cuaron, like Hoak , used a reasonable belief standard for determining when the possible destruction of evidence justifies warrantless action. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.