Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pennycuff v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Pennycuff v. State, 745 N.E.2d 804, 812 (Ind. 2001) (counsel’s decision to waive “perfunctory objections having little chance of success or no direct or substantial relationship to the main thrust of the defense is within the realm of reasonable trial strategy”) (internal quotation marks omitted); Myers, 33 N.E.3d at 1103 (finding no deficient performance when counsel failed to object “to avoid drawing unfavorable attention” to certain facts). | 1 | 1 |
John R. Myers II v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2019See Pennycuff v. State, 745 N.E.2d 804, 812 (Ind. 2001) (counsel’s decision to waive “perfunctory objections having little chance of success or no direct or substantial relationship to the main thrust of the defense is within the realm of reasonable trial strategy”) (internal quotation marks omitted); Myers, 33 N.E.3d at 1103 (finding no deficient performance when counsel failed to object “to avoid drawing unfavorable attention” to certain facts). | 1 | 1 |
Board of Commissioners of Miami County v. Klepingergreen2 sentences2002And, we have cautioned that when a statute “is the main thrust of an instruction,” it “must be correctly applied to the issues and the evidence.” Board of Comm’rs of Miami County v. Klepinger, 149 Ind.App. 377 , 273 N.E.2d 109, 114 (1971) (emphasis added). 2002And, we have cautioned that when a statute “is the main thrust of an instruction,” it “must be correctly applied to the issues and the evidence.” Board of Comm’rs of Miami County v. Klepinger, 149 Ind.App. 377 , 273 N.E.2d 109, 114 (1971) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Hudson v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Applying the principles of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we have held that "a decision to forego perfunctory objections having little chance of success or no direct or substantial relationship to the main thrust of the defense is within the realm of reasonable trial strategy." Hudson v. State, 496 N.E.2d 1286, 1294-95 (Ind.1986). 2001Applying the principles of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we have held that "a decision to forego perfunctory objections having little chance of success or no direct or substantial relationship to the main thrust of the defense is within the realm of reasonable trial strategy." Hudson v. State, 496 N.E.2d 1286, 1294-95 (Ind.1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bevill v. State
green
2 sentences2001Bevill v. State (1985), Ind., 472 N.E.2d 1247 . 2001Bevill v. State (1985), Ind., 472 N.E.2d 1247 . | 2 | 1986–2001 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2001Applying the principles of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we have held that "a decision to forego perfunctory objections having little chance of success or no direct or substantial relationship to the main thrust of the defense is within the realm of reasonable trial strategy." Hudson v. State, 496 N.E.2d 1286, 1294-95 (Ind.1986). 2001Applying the principles of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we have held that "a decision to forego perfunctory objections having little chance of success or no direct or substantial relationship to the main thrust of the defense is within the realm of reasonable trial strategy." Hudson v. State, 496 N.E.2d 1286, 1294-95 (Ind.1986). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Weaver v. American Oil Company
green
2 sentences1980Although Bolen has shown some facts similar to those in Weaver v. American Oil Co., (1971) 257 Ind. 458 , 276 N.E.2d 144 , the thrust of his defense, the trial court is not required to reach the same conclusions. 1980Although Bolen has shown some facts similar to those in Weaver v. American Oil Co., (1971) 257 Ind. 458 , 276 N.E.2d 144 , the thrust of his defense, the trial court is not required to reach the same conclusions. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Ruquist v. Ruquist
green
1 sentence1980Urbanational Developers, Inc. v. Shamrock Engineering, Inc. (1978), Ind.App., 372 N.E.2d 742 ; 4 W. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences1975Williams v. State, supra (1975), 263 Ind. 165 , 325 N.E.2d 827, 833 . : Among the factors normally relevant to such determination are whether the defendant has consulted with counsel, his apparent comprehension of the proceedings and the charge against him, whether it appears that his plea is the result of plea bargaining, and whether it appears that he has committed the acts with which he was charged. 1975Williams v. State, supra (1975), 263 Ind. 165 , 325 N.E.2d 827, 833 . : Among the factors normally relevant to such determination are whether the defendant has consulted with counsel, his apparent comprehension of the proceedings and the charge against him, whether it appears that his plea is the result of plea bargaining, and whether it appears that he has committed the acts with which he was charged. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.