Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bowersgreen2 sentences2003In such a situation, the jury may “consider the possibility of conviction for an offense consisting of the same, but fewer elements of the crime for which the defendant was brought to trial.” State v. Bowers, 349 Md. 710, 717 , 709 A.2d 1255, 1258 (1998) (quoting Janis L. 2003In such a situation, the jury may “consider the possibility of conviction for an offense consisting of the same, but fewer elements of the crime for which the defendant was brought to trial.” State v. Bowers, 349 Md. 710, 717 , 709 A.2d 1255, 1258 (1998) (quoting Janis L. | 1 | 1 |
Pugh v. Stategreen2 sentences1994Moreover, the jury’s initial verdicts were “not guilty.” A majority of this Court believed that the initial verdicts implicated the criminal law principle “that once a verdict of not guilty has been rendered at the conclusion of a criminal trial, that verdict is final.” Pugh v. State, 271 Md. 701, 705 , 319 A.2d 542, 544 (1974). 1994Moreover, the jury’s initial verdicts were “not guilty.” A majority of this Court believed that the initial verdicts implicated the criminal law principle “that once a verdict of not guilty has been rendered at the conclusion of a criminal trial, that verdict is final.” Pugh v. State, 271 Md. 701, 705 , 319 A.2d 542, 544 (1974). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Addington v. Texas
green
2 sentences1981Addington argued to the Court "that the rationale of the Winship holding that the criminal law standard of proof was required in a delinquency proceeding applies with equal force to a civil commitment proceeding.” Id. at 427 . 1979(Emphasis supplied.) The Court rejected the suggestion that it apply the criminal law standard of beyond a reasonable doubt to civil commitment “because, given the uncertainties of psychiatric diagnosis it may impose a burden the [Sjtate cannot meet and thereby erect an unreasonable barrier to needed medical treatment____To meet due process demands, the standard has to inform the factfinder that the proof must be greater than the preponderance of evidence standard applicable to other categories of civil cases.” Id. at 432-33 , 99 S.Ct. at 1812-13 , 60 L.Ed.2d at 335 . | 2 | 1979–1981 |
Hoffert v. State
green
2 sentences2012The Court observed that the holding in Hoffert v. State, 319 Md. 377 , 572 A.2d 536 (1990), that a verdict announced aloud in court could not subsequently be amended was inapplicable to civil cases like Nails because amending the verdict in Hoffert "implicated the criminal law principle 'that once a verdict of not guilty has been rendered at the conclusion of a criminal trial, that verdict is final.’ ” Nails, 334 Md. at 412 , 639 A.2d 660 . 6 . 2012The Court observed that the holding in Hoffert v. State, 319 Md. 377 , 572 A.2d 536 (1990), that a verdict announced aloud in court could not subsequently be amended was inapplicable to civil cases like Nails because amending the verdict in Hoffert "implicated the criminal law principle 'that once a verdict of not guilty has been rendered at the conclusion of a criminal trial, that verdict is final.’ ” Nails, 334 Md. at 412 , 639 A.2d 660 . 6 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences2012In Jones, 384 Md. at 683-84 , 866 A.2d 151 , the Court of Appeals held that unanimity-which is required to finalize the verdict in a criminal case-is determined by polling the jury, if the defendant requests, or else is determined by hearkening. 2012In Jones, 384 Md. at 683-84 , 866 A.2d 151 , the Court of Appeals held that unanimity-which is required to finalize the verdict in a criminal case-is determined by polling the jury, if the defendant requests, or else is determined by hearkening. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Nails v. S & R, INC.
green
2 sentences2012The Court observed that the holding in Hoffert v. State, 319 Md. 377 , 572 A.2d 536 (1990), that a verdict announced aloud in court could not subsequently be amended was inapplicable to civil cases like Nails because amending the verdict in Hoffert "implicated the criminal law principle 'that once a verdict of not guilty has been rendered at the conclusion of a criminal trial, that verdict is final.’ ” Nails, 334 Md. at 412 , 639 A.2d 660 . 6 . 2012The Court observed that the holding in Hoffert v. State, 319 Md. 377 , 572 A.2d 536 (1990), that a verdict announced aloud in court could not subsequently be amended was inapplicable to civil cases like Nails because amending the verdict in Hoffert "implicated the criminal law principle 'that once a verdict of not guilty has been rendered at the conclusion of a criminal trial, that verdict is final.’ ” Nails, 334 Md. at 412 , 639 A.2d 660 . 6 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Stokes v. State
green
1 sentence1981As the Court of Appeals recently stated in Stokes, supra, at 161: "A finding that an inducement is impermissible .. . may only result where the challenged statement was produced by police words or deeds which communicated a threat or promise to the defendant.” It remains for us to determine whether Detective Waters’ statements to appellant were inducements and whether appellant was influenced by such inducements in making the confession. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Harper v. State
neutral
1 sentence1969Harper v. State, 6 Md. App. 1 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.