orthodox rule (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

orthodox rule in Maryland

7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1974–1995 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Nathaniel Clifton v. United Statesgreen
cadc · 1967 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976
1 sentence

1976For example, in Clifton v. United States, 371 F. 2d 354, 360 (D.C.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

CaseCitedYears
Nance v. State green
md · 1993
2 sentences

1995Prior to Nance , Maryland had been “one of only a handful of states to adhere to the orthodox rule barring use of prior inconsistent statements as substan tive evidence.” Id. at 565 , 629 A.2d 633 .

1995Prior to Nance , Maryland had been “one of only a handful of states to adhere to the orthodox rule barring use of prior inconsistent statements as substan tive evidence.” Id. at 565 , 629 A.2d 633 .

41994–1995
Sheppard v. State green
mdctspecapp · 1994
2 sentences

1995In no respect were those holdings qualified or hedged in by weasel words such as “in the particular circumstances of this case” or “under the unique facts of this case.” Indeed, in Sheppard v. State, 102 Md.App. 571, 572-73 , 650 A.2d 1362 (1994), we characterized the broad, bold nature of the Nance decision: Prior to the Nance opinion, Maryland had been “one of only a handful of states to adhere to the orthodox rule barring use of prior inconsistent statements as probative evidence.” ...

1995In no respect were those holdings qualified or hedged in by weasel words such as “in the particular circumstances of this case” or “under the unique facts of this case.” Indeed, in Sheppard v. State, 102 Md.App. 571, 572-73 , 650 A.2d 1362 (1994), we characterized the broad, bold nature of the Nance decision: Prior to the Nance opinion, Maryland had been “one of only a handful of states to adhere to the orthodox rule barring use of prior inconsistent statements as probative evidence.” ...

21995–1995
Jackson v. Denno green
scotus · 1964
1 sentence

1976Moreover, his findings upon disputed issues of fact are expressly stated or may be ascertainable from the record.” 378 U. S. at 378-379 .

11976–1976
Smith v. Branscome green
md · 1968
1 sentence

1974United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F. Supp. 481 , aff'd 376 F. 2d 675 , cert. denied 389 U. S. 850 , rehearing denied 389 U. S. 998 ; Smith v. Branscome, 251 Md. 582, 589 ; Green v. State, 243 Md. 154, 157-158 ; Clay v. State, 211 Md. 577, 583 ; Sun Cab Co., Inc. v. Cusick, 209 Md. 354, 361 ; West v. Belle Isle Cab Co., 203 Md. 244, 253 ; Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474, 485 ; Vandergrift v. State, 17 Md.

11974–1974
Sun Cab Company, Inc. v. Cusick green
md · 1956
1 sentence

1974United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F. Supp. 481 , aff'd 376 F. 2d 675 , cert. denied 389 U. S. 850 , rehearing denied 389 U. S. 998 ; Smith v. Branscome, 251 Md. 582, 589 ; Green v. State, 243 Md. 154, 157-158 ; Clay v. State, 211 Md. 577, 583 ; Sun Cab Co., Inc. v. Cusick, 209 Md. 354, 361 ; West v. Belle Isle Cab Co., 203 Md. 244, 253 ; Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474, 485 ; Vandergrift v. State, 17 Md.

11974–1974
Foble v. Knefely green
md · 1939
1 sentence

1974United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F. Supp. 481 , aff'd 376 F. 2d 675 , cert. denied 389 U. S. 850 , rehearing denied 389 U. S. 998 ; Smith v. Branscome, 251 Md. 582, 589 ; Green v. State, 243 Md. 154, 157-158 ; Clay v. State, 211 Md. 577, 583 ; Sun Cab Co., Inc. v. Cusick, 209 Md. 354, 361 ; West v. Belle Isle Cab Co., 203 Md. 244, 253 ; Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474, 485 ; Vandergrift v. State, 17 Md.

11974–1974
Clay v. State green
md · 1957
1 sentence

1974United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F. Supp. 481 , aff'd 376 F. 2d 675 , cert. denied 389 U. S. 850 , rehearing denied 389 U. S. 998 ; Smith v. Branscome, 251 Md. 582, 589 ; Green v. State, 243 Md. 154, 157-158 ; Clay v. State, 211 Md. 577, 583 ; Sun Cab Co., Inc. v. Cusick, 209 Md. 354, 361 ; West v. Belle Isle Cab Co., 203 Md. 244, 253 ; Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474, 485 ; Vandergrift v. State, 17 Md.

11974–1974
Green v. State green
md · 1966
1 sentence

1974United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F. Supp. 481 , aff'd 376 F. 2d 675 , cert. denied 389 U. S. 850 , rehearing denied 389 U. S. 998 ; Smith v. Branscome, 251 Md. 582, 589 ; Green v. State, 243 Md. 154, 157-158 ; Clay v. State, 211 Md. 577, 583 ; Sun Cab Co., Inc. v. Cusick, 209 Md. 354, 361 ; West v. Belle Isle Cab Co., 203 Md. 244, 253 ; Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474, 485 ; Vandergrift v. State, 17 Md.

11974–1974
United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corporation and Willard R. Custer green
ca4 · 1967
1 sentence

1974United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F. Supp. 481 , aff'd 376 F. 2d 675 , cert. denied 389 U. S. 850 , rehearing denied 389 U. S. 998 ; Smith v. Branscome, 251 Md. 582, 589 ; Green v. State, 243 Md. 154, 157-158 ; Clay v. State, 211 Md. 577, 583 ; Sun Cab Co., Inc. v. Cusick, 209 Md. 354, 361 ; West v. Belle Isle Cab Co., 203 Md. 244, 253 ; Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474, 485 ; Vandergrift v. State, 17 Md.

11974–1974
Ober v. Nagy green
scotus · 1967
1 sentence

1974United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F. Supp. 481 , aff'd 376 F. 2d 675 , cert. denied 389 U. S. 850 , rehearing denied 389 U. S. 998 ; Smith v. Branscome, 251 Md. 582, 589 ; Green v. State, 243 Md. 154, 157-158 ; Clay v. State, 211 Md. 577, 583 ; Sun Cab Co., Inc. v. Cusick, 209 Md. 354, 361 ; West v. Belle Isle Cab Co., 203 Md. 244, 253 ; Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474, 485 ; Vandergrift v. State, 17 Md.

11974–1974
Custer Channel Wing Corp. v. United States green
scotus · 1967
1 sentence

1974United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F. Supp. 481 , aff'd 376 F. 2d 675 , cert. denied 389 U. S. 850 , rehearing denied 389 U. S. 998 ; Smith v. Branscome, 251 Md. 582, 589 ; Green v. State, 243 Md. 154, 157-158 ; Clay v. State, 211 Md. 577, 583 ; Sun Cab Co., Inc. v. Cusick, 209 Md. 354, 361 ; West v. Belle Isle Cab Co., 203 Md. 244, 253 ; Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474, 485 ; Vandergrift v. State, 17 Md.

11974–1974
Vandergrift v. State neutral
mdctspecapp · 1973
1 sentence

1974United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F. Supp. 481 , aff'd 376 F. 2d 675 , cert. denied 389 U. S. 850 , rehearing denied 389 U. S. 998 ; Smith v. Branscome, 251 Md. 582, 589 ; Green v. State, 243 Md. 154, 157-158 ; Clay v. State, 211 Md. 577, 583 ; Sun Cab Co., Inc. v. Cusick, 209 Md. 354, 361 ; West v. Belle Isle Cab Co., 203 Md. 244, 253 ; Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474, 485 ; Vandergrift v. State, 17 Md.

11974–1974
United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corporation green
mdd · 1965
1 sentence

1974United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F. Supp. 481 , aff'd 376 F. 2d 675 , cert. denied 389 U. S. 850 , rehearing denied 389 U. S. 998 ; Smith v. Branscome, 251 Md. 582, 589 ; Green v. State, 243 Md. 154, 157-158 ; Clay v. State, 211 Md. 577, 583 ; Sun Cab Co., Inc. v. Cusick, 209 Md. 354, 361 ; West v. Belle Isle Cab Co., 203 Md. 244, 253 ; Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474, 485 ; Vandergrift v. State, 17 Md.

11974–1974
West v. Belle Isle Cab Co. green
md · 2001
1 sentence

1974United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F. Supp. 481 , aff'd 376 F. 2d 675 , cert. denied 389 U. S. 850 , rehearing denied 389 U. S. 998 ; Smith v. Branscome, 251 Md. 582, 589 ; Green v. State, 243 Md. 154, 157-158 ; Clay v. State, 211 Md. 577, 583 ; Sun Cab Co., Inc. v. Cusick, 209 Md. 354, 361 ; West v. Belle Isle Cab Co., 203 Md. 244, 253 ; Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474, 485 ; Vandergrift v. State, 17 Md.

11974–1974

Where else courts name it

CA 13 (1959–2024) MO 10 (1905–1985) NJ 8 (1953–1990) MD 7 (1974–1995) PA 6 (1937–1998) WV 5 (1974–1991) SD 5 (1968–1994) IA 4 (1965–2003) CO 3 (1939–1987) MI 3 (1960–1994) WY 2 (1937–1988) RI 2 (1978–1987) MN 2 (1973–1990) NY 2 (1943–1967) ME 2 (1968–1978) AL 2 (1985–1986) TX 2 (1959–2000) WI 2 (1956–1984) IL 2 (1957–1964)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check