7 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Hernandez-Albinogreen1 sentence2007In United States v. Hernandez-Albino, 177 F.3d 33, 38 (1st Cir.1999), the Court of Appeals stated three requirements for instructing a jury that has indicated it is at an impasse. | 1 | 1 |
Gruber v. Grubergreen2 sentences1978Gruber v. Gruber, 161 Me. 289, 292 , 211 A.2d 583, 585 (1965). 1978Gruber v. Gruber, 161 Me. 289, 292 , 211 A.2d 583, 585 (1965). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sweatt
green
1 sentence2017Since It Is a crlmlnal rule and since the rule Itself allows such a motion to be joined with a motion to suppress, the court concludes that the State, although not the movant, carries the burden of establlshlng that it is entitled to maintain possession of the property, In State v Sweatt, 427 A.2d 940 (Me. 1981) provides that; Whether evidence should be suppressed and whether It should be returned to Its owner are distinguishable questions .......... | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Ford Motor Company v. Darling's
green
2 sentences2017Ford Motor Co. v. Darling’s, 2014 ME 7, ¶ 33 , 86 A.3d 35 . 2017Ford Motor Co. v. Darling’s, 2014 ME 7, ¶ 33 , 86 A.3d 35 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Citron v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
green
1 sentence2003The plaintiff’s [dissenter’s] contrary evidence is unpersuasive and insufficient to discharge her burden of proving that the merger price was unfair.” 584 A.2d at 505 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
In Re WINSHIP
green
2 sentences1990In support of his argument, defendant cites In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 , 90 S.Ct. 1068 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970), and its progeny, contending that any ruling that creates a mandatory presumption relieving the State of its burden of proof is a violation of due process. 1990In support of his argument, defendant cites In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 , 90 S.Ct. 1068 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970), and its progeny, contending that any ruling that creates a mandatory presumption relieving the State of its burden of proof is a violation of due process. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Gilbert v. California
green
2 sentences1979As the Supreme Court noted in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. at 111-12 , 97 S.Ct. at 2251 : “The driving force behind United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967), and Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967) [right to counsel at a post-indictment lineup], and Stovall [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ], all decided on the same day, was the Court’s concern with the problems of eyewitness identification. 1979As the Supreme Court noted in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. at 111-12 , 97 S.Ct. at 2251 : “The driving force behind United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967), and Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967) [right to counsel at a post-indictment lineup], and Stovall [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ], all decided on the same day, was the Court’s concern with the problems of eyewitness identification. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Stovall v. Denno
green
2 sentences1979As the Supreme Court noted in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. at 111-12 , 97 S.Ct. at 2251 : “The driving force behind United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967), and Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967) [right to counsel at a post-indictment lineup], and Stovall [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ], all decided on the same day, was the Court’s concern with the problems of eyewitness identification. 1979As the Supreme Court noted in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. at 111-12 , 97 S.Ct. at 2251 : “The driving force behind United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967), and Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967) [right to counsel at a post-indictment lineup], and Stovall [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ], all decided on the same day, was the Court’s concern with the problems of eyewitness identification. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
United States v. Wade
green
2 sentences1979As the Supreme Court noted in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. at 111-12 , 97 S.Ct. at 2251 : “The driving force behind United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967), and Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967) [right to counsel at a post-indictment lineup], and Stovall [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ], all decided on the same day, was the Court’s concern with the problems of eyewitness identification. 1979As the Supreme Court noted in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. at 111-12 , 97 S.Ct. at 2251 : “The driving force behind United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967), and Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967) [right to counsel at a post-indictment lineup], and Stovall [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ], all decided on the same day, was the Court’s concern with the problems of eyewitness identification. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Manson v. Brathwaite
green
2 sentences1979As the Supreme Court noted in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. at 111-12 , 97 S.Ct. at 2251 : “The driving force behind United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967), and Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967) [right to counsel at a post-indictment lineup], and Stovall [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ], all decided on the same day, was the Court’s concern with the problems of eyewitness identification. 1979As the Supreme Court noted in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. at 111-12 , 97 S.Ct. at 2251 : “The driving force behind United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967), and Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967) [right to counsel at a post-indictment lineup], and Stovall [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ], all decided on the same day, was the Court’s concern with the problems of eyewitness identification. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.