7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1859–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Easongreen1 sentence2026“In order to preserve a question for appellate review, a party must have presented the trial court with a timely request, objection or motion, stating the specific grounds for the ruling sought if the specific grounds are not apparent.” State v. Eason, 328 N.C. 409, 420 (1991) (citing N.C. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Petersongreen2 sentences2008Thus, we determine whether the trial court abused its discretion and therefore, whether its ruling “could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.” Peterson, 361 N.C. at 606 , 652 S.E.2d at 229 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Jones, 355 N.C. at 131 , 558 S.E.2d at 106 ). 2008Thus, we determine whether the trial court abused its discretion and therefore, whether its ruling “could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.” Peterson, 361 N.C. at 606 , 652 S.E.2d at 229 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Jones, 355 N.C. at 131 , 558 S.E.2d at 106 ). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Anthonygreen2 sentences2006“The law wisely permits evidence not otherwise admissible to be offered to explain or rebut evidence elicited by the defendant himself.” State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 415 , 555 S.E.2d 557, 585 (2001) (internal quotations and citations omitted), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 153 L. 2006“The law wisely permits evidence not otherwise admissible to be offered to explain or rebut evidence elicited by the defendant himself.” State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 415 , 555 S.E.2d 557, 585 (2001) (internal quotations and citations omitted), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 153 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Stancil
green
2 sentences2009Because there was no physical evidence presented at trial, Ms. Fiore’s statement was “an impermissible opinion regarding the victim’s credibility.” Stancil, 355 N.C. at 266-67 , 559 S.E.2d at 789 . 2009Because there was no physical evidence presented at trial, Ms. Fiore’s statement was “an impermissible opinion regarding the victim’s credibility.” Stancil, 355 N.C. at 266-67 , 559 S.E.2d at 789 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences2008Thus, we determine whether the trial court abused its discretion and therefore, whether its ruling “could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.” Peterson, 361 N.C. at 606 , 652 S.E.2d at 229 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Jones, 355 N.C. at 131 , 558 S.E.2d at 106 ). 2008Thus, we determine whether the trial court abused its discretion and therefore, whether its ruling “could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.” Peterson, 361 N.C. at 606 , 652 S.E.2d at 229 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Jones, 355 N.C. at 131 , 558 S.E.2d at 106 ). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Hill v. U. S. Trustee
green
1 sentence2006“The law wisely permits evidence not otherwise admissible to be offered to explain or rebut evidence elicited by the defendant himself.” State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 415 , 555 S.E.2d 557, 585 (2001) (internal quotations and citations omitted), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 153 L. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Blas v. Alameida, Director, California Department of Corrections
green
1 sentence2006“The law wisely permits evidence not otherwise admissible to be offered to explain or rebut evidence elicited by the defendant himself.” State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 415 , 555 S.E.2d 557, 585 (2001) (internal quotations and citations omitted), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 153 L. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Canestrino v. Powell
green
2 sentences1961In Canestrino v. Powell, 231 N.C. 190 , 56 S.E.2d 566 , the plaintiff sued the Receivers of the Seaboard Air Line Railway Company and Fred W. 1961In Canestrino v. Powell, 231 N.C. 190 , 56 S.E.2d 566 , the plaintiff sued the Receivers of the Seaboard Air Line Railway Company and Fred W. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
State v. Traylor
neutral
1 sentence1918This is the rule laid down in S. v. Traylor, 121 N. C., 674 , and S. v. Foster, 130 N. C., 676 . | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Clement v. . Cauble
neutral
1 sentence1859The court overruled the exception and ordered the report to be confirmed, from which order Willie Johnson and others, the children aforesaid of John, appealed to this Court. *Page 110 The facts of this case present the same question which was decided by this Court in Clement v. Cauble , 55 N.C. 82 . | 1 | 1859–1859 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.