Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1929–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Parker v. State
green
2 sentences2022Brown v. State, 2018 OK CR 3, ¶ 47 , 422 P.3d 155, 167 . 4 Hendricks was decided before our decision in Parker v. St ate, 1996 OK CR 19 , 917 P.2d 980 , where this Court overruled the requirement that a criminal Information must set forth facts to allege each element of the crime charged. 5 Cited at Lacey , 675 S.E.2d at 850 . 6 IRC R302.5.1, International Residential Code, International Code Council, Falls Church, Va. (2021) . 7 Merriam-Webster online dictionary (Oct. 2021). 2022Brown v. State, 2018 OK CR 3, ¶ 47 , 422 P.3d 155, 167 . 4 Hendricks was decided before our decision in Parker v. St ate, 1996 OK CR 19 , 917 P.2d 980 , where this Court overruled the requirement that a criminal Information must set forth facts to allege each element of the crime charged. 5 Cited at Lacey , 675 S.E.2d at 850 . 6 IRC R302.5.1, International Residential Code, International Code Council, Falls Church, Va. (2021) . 7 Merriam-Webster online dictionary (Oct. 2021). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
BROWN v. STATE
green
2 sentences2022Brown v. State, 2018 OK CR 3, ¶ 47 , 422 P.3d 155, 167 . 4 Hendricks was decided before our decision in Parker v. St ate, 1996 OK CR 19 , 917 P.2d 980 , where this Court overruled the requirement that a criminal Information must set forth facts to allege each element of the crime charged. 5 Cited at Lacey , 675 S.E.2d at 850 . 6 IRC R302.5.1, International Residential Code, International Code Council, Falls Church, Va. (2021) . 7 Merriam-Webster online dictionary (Oct. 2021). 2022Brown v. State, 2018 OK CR 3, ¶ 47 , 422 P.3d 155, 167 . 4 Hendricks was decided before our decision in Parker v. St ate, 1996 OK CR 19 , 917 P.2d 980 , where this Court overruled the requirement that a criminal Information must set forth facts to allege each element of the crime charged. 5 Cited at Lacey , 675 S.E.2d at 850 . 6 IRC R302.5.1, International Residential Code, International Code Council, Falls Church, Va. (2021) . 7 Merriam-Webster online dictionary (Oct. 2021). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Hendricks v. State
green
2 sentences2022ROWLAND, PRESIDING JUDGE, SPECIALLY CONCURRING: ¶1 I concur in Judge Lewis's opinion, and I would add that I find Hendricks v. State, 1985 OK CR 39 , 698 P.2d 477 monumentally unhelpful in resolving this case. 2022ROWLAND, PRESIDING JUDGE, SPECIALLY CONCURRING: ¶1 I concur in Judge Lewis's opinion, and I would add that I find Hendricks v. State, 1985 OK CR 39 , 698 P.2d 477 monumentally unhelpful in resolving this case. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Lacey v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2022Brown v. State, 2018 OK CR 3, ¶ 47 , 422 P.3d 155, 167 . 4 Hendricks was decided before our decision in Parker v. St ate, 1996 OK CR 19 , 917 P.2d 980 , where this Court overruled the requirement that a criminal Information must set forth facts to allege each element of the crime charged. 5 Cited at Lacey , 675 S.E.2d at 850 . 6 IRC R302.5.1, International Residential Code, International Code Council, Falls Church, Va. (2021) . 7 Merriam-Webster online dictionary (Oct. 2021). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Shrum v. State
green
2 sentences2005The trial court overruled the defense objection and instructed on the lesser-offense alternative, which the jury ultimately convicted Appellant of. ¶ 12 Appellant relies on Shrum v. State, 1999 OK CR 41 , 991 P.2d 1032 , for his claim that he was entitled to waive any lesser related offense instructions and opt for an "all or nothing" approach, if only because the State did not affirmatively request any lesser *668 offense instructions itself. 2005The trial court overruled the defense objection and instructed on the lesser-offense alternative, which the jury ultimately convicted Appellant of. ¶ 12 Appellant relies on Shrum v. State, 1999 OK CR 41 , 991 P.2d 1032 , for his claim that he was entitled to waive any lesser related offense instructions and opt for an "all or nothing" approach, if only because the State did not affirmatively request any lesser *668 offense instructions itself. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences1988In Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), the United States Supreme Court held that the systematic exclusion of minority members from a jury is improper. 1988In Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), the United States Supreme Court held that the systematic exclusion of minority members from a jury is improper. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Wolfe v. Stanford
green
2 sentences1957In the case of Wolfe v. Stanford, 179 Okl. 27 , 64 P.2d 335, 339 , this Court overruled the rule of pleading as announced in the case of Clark v. Mercer Oil Co., supra, which had to do with what plaintiffs’ petition must contain to justify partition. 1957In the case of Wolfe v. Stanford, 179 Okl. 27 , 64 P.2d 335, 339 , this Court overruled the rule of pleading as announced in the case of Clark v. Mercer Oil Co., supra, which had to do with what plaintiffs’ petition must contain to justify partition. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Todd v. Page
neutral
1 sentence1934Lowenstein v. Todd, 40 Okla. 18 , 135 P. 737 ; Tyler v. Tyler, 44 Okla. 411 , 144 P. 1023 ; Malleck v. Thomas, 109 Okla. 95 , 234 P. 1107 ; Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co., 77 Okla. 23 , 185 P. 180 ; and Sac & Fox Co. v. Owens, 133 Okla. 96, 97 , 271 P. 240 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Nelson v. Jones
neutral
1 sentence1934Lowenstein v. Todd, 40 Okla. 18 , 135 P. 737 ; Tyler v. Tyler, 44 Okla. 411 , 144 P. 1023 ; Malleck v. Thomas, 109 Okla. 95 , 234 P. 1107 ; Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co., 77 Okla. 23 , 185 P. 180 ; and Sac & Fox Co. v. Owens, 133 Okla. 96, 97 , 271 P. 240 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Wofford v. State
neutral
1 sentence1934Lowenstein v. Todd, 40 Okla. 18 , 135 P. 737 ; Tyler v. Tyler, 44 Okla. 411 , 144 P. 1023 ; Malleck v. Thomas, 109 Okla. 95 , 234 P. 1107 ; Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co., 77 Okla. 23 , 185 P. 180 ; and Sac & Fox Co. v. Owens, 133 Okla. 96, 97 , 271 P. 240 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co.
neutral
1 sentence1934Lowenstein v. Todd, 40 Okla. 18 , 135 P. 737 ; Tyler v. Tyler, 44 Okla. 411 , 144 P. 1023 ; Malleck v. Thomas, 109 Okla. 95 , 234 P. 1107 ; Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co., 77 Okla. 23 , 185 P. 180 ; and Sac & Fox Co. v. Owens, 133 Okla. 96, 97 , 271 P. 240 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Berger Mfg. v. School Dist. No. 10 of Muskogee Co.
neutral
1 sentence1934Lowenstein v. Todd, 40 Okla. 18 , 135 P. 737 ; Tyler v. Tyler, 44 Okla. 411 , 144 P. 1023 ; Malleck v. Thomas, 109 Okla. 95 , 234 P. 1107 ; Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co., 77 Okla. 23 , 185 P. 180 ; and Sac & Fox Co. v. Owens, 133 Okla. 96, 97 , 271 P. 240 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Tyler v. Tyler
neutral
1 sentence1934Lowenstein v. Todd, 40 Okla. 18 , 135 P. 737 ; Tyler v. Tyler, 44 Okla. 411 , 144 P. 1023 ; Malleck v. Thomas, 109 Okla. 95 , 234 P. 1107 ; Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co., 77 Okla. 23 , 185 P. 180 ; and Sac & Fox Co. v. Owens, 133 Okla. 96, 97 , 271 P. 240 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Sac & Fox Oil Co. v. Owens
neutral
1 sentence1934Lowenstein v. Todd, 40 Okla. 18 , 135 P. 737 ; Tyler v. Tyler, 44 Okla. 411 , 144 P. 1023 ; Malleck v. Thomas, 109 Okla. 95 , 234 P. 1107 ; Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co., 77 Okla. 23 , 185 P. 180 ; and Sac & Fox Co. v. Owens, 133 Okla. 96, 97 , 271 P. 240 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Malleck v. Thomas
neutral
2 sentences1934Lowenstein v. Todd, 40 Okla. 18 , 135 P. 737 ; Tyler v. Tyler, 44 Okla. 411 , 144 P. 1023 ; Malleck v. Thomas, 109 Okla. 95 , 234 P. 1107 ; Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co., 77 Okla. 23 , 185 P. 180 ; and Sac & Fox Co. v. Owens, 133 Okla. 96, 97 , 271 P. 240 . 1934Lowenstein v. Todd, 40 Okla. 18 , 135 P. 737 ; Tyler v. Tyler, 44 Okla. 411 , 144 P. 1023 ; Malleck v. Thomas, 109 Okla. 95 , 234 P. 1107 ; Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co., 77 Okla. 23 , 185 P. 180 ; and Sac & Fox Co. v. Owens, 133 Okla. 96, 97 , 271 P. 240 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Board of County Commissioners v. Beauchamp
neutral
1 sentence1929A. (N. S.) 119.” It will thus be seen that, in the case of Roe v. State, supra, this court overruled the doctrine announced in Adair v. State, supra, that “the defendant is not criminally responsible, if, by reason of insanity, [he] did not *296 have the will and mental power to refrain from the committing such act.” In the case of McNeill v. State, 18 Okla. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
McNeill v. State
neutral
1 sentence1929Cr. 1 , 192 Pac. 256 , this court re-stated the rule laid down in Roe v. State, supra, as the true test of the insanity of the defendant. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.