Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Bullaboughgreen2 sentences2006See In re Bullabough, 89 N.C.App. 171 , 185-86, 365 S.E.2d 642 , 650 (1988). *511 In re Robinson, 151 N.C.App. 733 , 736-37, 567 S.E.2d 227 , 229 (2002). 2006See In re Bullabough, 89 N.C.App. 171 , 185-86, 365 S.E.2d 642 , 650 (1988). *511 In re Robinson, 151 N.C.App. 733 , 736-37, 567 S.E.2d 227 , 229 (2002). | 3 | 3 |
Ge Betz, Inc. v. Conradgreen2 sentences2019App. 672 , 686–87, 562 S.E.2d 82 , 92–93 (2002) (holding, after engaging in a textual analysis of G.S. § 1D-25(b), that the North Carolina legislature intended for the punitive damages cap to be applied on a per-plaintiff basis), aff’d, Rhyne v. K- Mart Corp., 358 N.C. 160 , 187–88, 594 S.E.2d 1 , 19–20 (2004) (holding same); Ge Betz, Inc. v. Conrad, 231 N.C. 2019App. 214, 24041 , 752 S.E.2d 634, 653 (2013) (holding same). 134. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Robinsongreen2 sentences2006See In re Bullabough, 89 N.C.App. 171 , 185-86, 365 S.E.2d 642 , 650 (1988). *511 In re Robinson, 151 N.C.App. 733 , 736-37, 567 S.E.2d 227 , 229 (2002). 2006See In re Bullabough, 89 N.C.App. 171 , 185-86, 365 S.E.2d 642 , 650 (1988). *511 In re Robinson, 151 N.C.App. 733 , 736-37, 567 S.E.2d 227 , 229 (2002). | 1 | 1 |
Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.green2 sentences2005See Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 , 96-97, 103 S.Ct. 2890 , 2899-900, 77 L.Ed.2d 490 , 501 (1983)(deciding, based on a definition from Black's Law Dictionary, that a state law "relates to" an employee benefit plan if it has a connection or reference to the plan). 2005See Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 , 96-97, 103 S.Ct. 2890 , 2899-900, 77 L.Ed.2d 490 , 501 (1983)(deciding, based on a definition from Black's Law Dictionary, that a state law "relates to" an employee benefit plan if it has a connection or reference to the plan). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Rankin
green
1 sentence2019Rankin, __ N.C. at __, 821 S.E.2d at 792 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.
green
1 sentence2019App. 672 , 686–87, 562 S.E.2d 82 , 92–93 (2002) (holding, after engaging in a textual analysis of G.S. § 1D-25(b), that the North Carolina legislature intended for the punitive damages cap to be applied on a per-plaintiff basis), aff’d, Rhyne v. K- Mart Corp., 358 N.C. 160 , 187–88, 594 S.E.2d 1 , 19–20 (2004) (holding same); Ge Betz, Inc. v. Conrad, 231 N.C. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.
green
2 sentences2019App. 672 , 686–87, 562 S.E.2d 82 , 92–93 (2002) (holding, after engaging in a textual analysis of G.S. § 1D-25(b), that the North Carolina legislature intended for the punitive damages cap to be applied on a per-plaintiff basis), aff’d, Rhyne v. K- Mart Corp., 358 N.C. 160 , 187–88, 594 S.E.2d 1 , 19–20 (2004) (holding same); Ge Betz, Inc. v. Conrad, 231 N.C. 2019App. 672 , 686–87, 562 S.E.2d 82 , 92–93 (2002) (holding, after engaging in a textual analysis of G.S. § 1D-25(b), that the North Carolina legislature intended for the punitive damages cap to be applied on a per-plaintiff basis), aff’d, Rhyne v. K- Mart Corp., 358 N.C. 160 , 187–88, 594 S.E.2d 1 , 19–20 (2004) (holding same); Ge Betz, Inc. v. Conrad, 231 N.C. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Fex v. Michigan
green
1 sentence1998Id. at 52 , 122 L. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.