Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1894–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Isdoll v. Scottsdale Insurancegreen1 sentence1998Co., 466 S.E.2d 48, 50 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995) (holding that a policy providing coverage for assault and battery and violation of a person’s civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 , et seq. or state law, but excluding “damages arising out of the wilful violation of a penal statute or ordinance committed by or with the knowledge or consent of any INSURED” to be fatally ambiguous), cert. denied, 219 Ga. Ct. App. 912, — S.E.2d - (1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Trought v. Richardson
green
1 sentence1986In Trought v. Richardson, 78 N.C. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Walker v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
green
1 sentence1986This Court affirmed summary judgment for defendant, stating, “[o]ur decision in Sides rested on facts clearly showing a wilful violation of the law and was consistent with other jurisdictions’ insistence that the employer’s conduct be in clear violation of express public policy to be actionable.” Id. at 263, 335 S.E. 2d at 86 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Atkins
green
2 sentences1985“A wilful violation of any one of these statutes [N.C.G.S. 20-165.1, 20-138, -139] would constitute culpable negligence if that violation was the proximate cause of [the victim’s] death." State v. Atkins, 58 N.C. 1985App. 146, 148 , 292 S.E. 2d 744, 746 , cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 306 N.C. 744 (1982). 6 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Rhodes v. Board of Education
green
1 sentence1985App. 146, 148 , 292 S.E. 2d 744, 746 , cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 306 N.C. 744 (1982). 6 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Manufacturing Co. v. . Arnold
green
2 sentences1973Among other cases, plaintiff cites Manufacturing Co. v. Arnold, 228 N.C. 375 , 45 S.E. 2d 577 (1947). 1973Among other cases, plaintiff cites Manufacturing Co. v. Arnold, 228 N.C. 375 , 45 S.E. 2d 577 (1947). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Bloom v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1969I accept with full approval the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in Duncan v. State of La., 391 U.S. 145, 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491, 522 , and in Bloom v. State of Ill., 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 . 1969I accept with full approval the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in Duncan v. State of La., 391 U.S. 145, 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491, 522 , and in Bloom v. State of Ill., 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Duncan v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1969I accept with full approval the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in Duncan v. State of La., 391 U.S. 145, 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491, 522 , and in Bloom v. State of Ill., 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 . 1969I accept with full approval the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in Duncan v. State of La., 391 U.S. 145, 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491, 522 , and in Bloom v. State of Ill., 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
neutral
2 sentences1959Goldsboro v. Railroad, 246 N.C. 101 , 97 S.E. 2d 486 , St. 1959Goldsboro v. Railroad, 246 N.C. 101 , 97 S.E. 2d 486 , St. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Vestal v. Moseley Vending MacHine Exchange, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences1959Vestal v. Moseley Vending Machine Co., 219 N.C. 468 , 14 S.E. 2d 427 .” Even so, a careful examination of the record reveals that the facts found by the court below with respect to the wilful violation of the restraining order by each-of the re7 spondents are supported by competent evidence and such findings áre therefore binding upon appeal. 1959Vestal v. Moseley Vending Machine Co., 219 N.C. 468 , 14 S.E. 2d 427 .” Even so, a careful examination of the record reveals that the facts found by the court below with respect to the wilful violation of the restraining order by each-of the re7 spondents are supported by competent evidence and such findings áre therefore binding upon appeal. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
New Orleans, Jackson, & Great Northern Railroad v. Hurst
green
1 sentence1894In Railroad v. Hurst, 36 Miss., 660 , it is said: “ It is the right of the jury in such cases to protect the public by punitive damages against the negligence, folly or wickedness which might otherwise convert these great public blessings into the most dangerous nuisances.” The Railroad Commission Act (1891, ch. 320) sec. 11, provides that for a wilful violation of the rules and regulations made by the commissioners, railroad companies are liable for exemplary damages. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.