Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1916–1967 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Erickson v. Wiper
green
2 sentences1938Erickson v. Wiper, 33 N. D. 193 , 157 N. W. 592 ; Raich v. Lindebek, 36 N. D. 133 , 161 N. W. 1026 ; Raad v. Grant, 43 N. D. 546 , 169 N. W. 588 ; Halstead v. Missouri Slope Land & Invest. 1938Erickson v. Wiper, 33 N. D. 193 , 157 N. W. 592 ; Raich v. Lindebek, 36 N. D. 133 , 161 N. W. 1026 ; Raad v. Grant, 43 N. D. 546 , 169 N. W. 588 ; Halstead v. Missouri Slope Land & Invest. | 4 | 1916–1938 |
Robbins v. Robbins
green
2 sentences1967Mills v. Roggensack, N.D., 92 N.W. 2d 722 ; Robbins v. Robbins, N.D., 70 N.W. 2d 37 . 1966Robbins v. Robbins, N.D., 70 N.W.2d 37 ; Mills v. Roggensack, N.D., 92 N.W.2d 722 ; First National Bank of Crary v. Bremseth, supra; Mevorah v. Goodman, N.D., 65 N.W. 2d 278 . | 3 | 1958–1967 |
Mills v. Roggensack
green
2 sentences1967Mills v. Roggensack, N.D., 92 N.W. 2d 722 ; Robbins v. Robbins, N.D., 70 N.W. 2d 37 . 1966Robbins v. Robbins, N.D., 70 N.W.2d 37 ; Mills v. Roggensack, N.D., 92 N.W.2d 722 ; First National Bank of Crary v. Bremseth, supra; Mevorah v. Goodman, N.D., 65 N.W. 2d 278 . | 2 | 1966–1967 |
Raad v. Grant
green
2 sentences1947Raad v. Grant, 43 ND 546 , 169 NW 588 . 1938Erickson v. Wiper, 33 N. D. 193 , 157 N. W. 592 ; Raich v. Lindebek, 36 N. D. 133 , 161 N. W. 1026 ; Raad v. Grant, 43 N. D. 546 , 169 N. W. 588 ; Halstead v. Missouri Slope Land & Invest. | 2 | 1938–1947 |
Lindenberg v. Folson
green
1 sentence1967Julson v. Loyal Order of Moose Number 822, N.D., 140 N.W.2d 39 ; Lindenberg v. Folson, supra. We come now to the second ground of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, the alleged misconduct of jurors. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Campbell v. Russell
neutral
1 sentence1967Campbell v. Russell, N.D., 132 N.W.2d 705 ; Klokstad v. Ward, N.D., 131 N.W.2d 244 ; Grenz v. Werre, supra. We find that plaintiff has not sustained the burden of presenting a record affirmatively showing error, and further, a review of the record in this case indicates to us, when we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, as we must do, that the evidence does sustain the verdict. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Grenz v. Werre
green
1 sentence1967Campbell v. Russell, N.D., 132 N.W.2d 705 ; Klokstad v. Ward, N.D., 131 N.W.2d 244 ; Grenz v. Werre, supra. We find that plaintiff has not sustained the burden of presenting a record affirmatively showing error, and further, a review of the record in this case indicates to us, when we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, as we must do, that the evidence does sustain the verdict. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Klokstad v. Ward
neutral
1 sentence1967Campbell v. Russell, N.D., 132 N.W.2d 705 ; Klokstad v. Ward, N.D., 131 N.W.2d 244 ; Grenz v. Werre, supra. We find that plaintiff has not sustained the burden of presenting a record affirmatively showing error, and further, a review of the record in this case indicates to us, when we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, as we must do, that the evidence does sustain the verdict. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Julson v. Loyal Order of Moose Number 822
green
1 sentence1967Julson v. Loyal Order of Moose Number 822, N.D., 140 N.W.2d 39 ; Lindenberg v. Folson, supra. We come now to the second ground of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, the alleged misconduct of jurors. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Mevorah v. Goodman
green
1 sentence1966Robbins v. Robbins, N.D., 70 N.W.2d 37 ; Mills v. Roggensack, N.D., 92 N.W.2d 722 ; First National Bank of Crary v. Bremseth, supra; Mevorah v. Goodman, N.D., 65 N.W. 2d 278 . | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Carney v. Duniway
green
2 sentences1947If it were so the respondent must see to it that the matter which renders it harmless or removes it is made to affirmatively appear in the bill of exceptions.” In Carney v. Duniway, 35 Or 131 , 57 P 192 , supra, the court said: — “While the rule that error will not be presumed on *155 appeal is well settled, it is equally true that where error is affirmatively shown it will not be presumed, because the record is silent, that it was subsequently corrected or rendered harmless, but it must affirmatively so appear, or the judgment will be reversed.” In this case the appellant has presented a reco 1947If it were so the respondent must see to it that the matter which renders it harmless or removes it is made to affirmatively appear in the bill of exceptions.” In Carney v. Duniway, 35 Or 131 , 57 P 192 , supra, the court said: — “While the rule that error will not be presumed on *155 appeal is well settled, it is equally true that where error is affirmatively shown it will not be presumed, because the record is silent, that it was subsequently corrected or rendered harmless, but it must affirmatively so appear, or the judgment will be reversed.” In this case the appellant has presented a reco | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Raich v. Lindebek
green
2 sentences1938Erickson v. Wiper, 33 N. D. 193 , 157 N. W. 592 ; Raich v. Lindebek, 36 N. D. 133 , 161 N. W. 1026 ; Raad v. Grant, 43 N. D. 546 , 169 N. W. 588 ; Halstead v. Missouri Slope Land & Invest. 1938Erickson v. Wiper, 33 N. D. 193 , 157 N. W. 592 ; Raich v. Lindebek, 36 N. D. 133 , 161 N. W. 1026 ; Raad v. Grant, 43 N. D. 546 , 169 N. W. 588 ; Halstead v. Missouri Slope Land & Invest. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.