Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1966–1995 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co.green2 sentences1995We have also held, however, that “a causal violation of a statutory standard of conduct constitutes legal fault in the same manner as does the causal violation of a common-law standard of due care,” Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 112 N.H. 50, 52 , 289 A.2d 68, 71 (1972), and that “[t]he breach of a statutory duty results in liability . . . when the plaintiff is in a class the statute is designed to protect and the injury is of the type that the statute is intended to prevent,” Island Shores Estates Condo. 1995We have also held, however, that “a causal violation of a statutory standard of conduct constitutes legal fault in the same manner as does the causal violation of a common-law standard of due care,” Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 112 N.H. 50, 52 , 289 A.2d 68, 71 (1972), and that “[t]he breach of a statutory duty results in liability . . . when the plaintiff is in a class the statute is designed to protect and the injury is of the type that the statute is intended to prevent,” Island Shores Estates Condo. | 4 | 4 |
LeFavor v. Fordgreen2 sentences1995A causal violation of an ordinance, like a causal violation of a statute, constitutes legal fault, see LeFavor v. Ford, 135 N.H. 311, 314 , 604 A.2d 570, 572 (1992), and may be used as evidence to prove breach of implied warranty. 1995A causal violation of an ordinance, like a causal violation of a statute, constitutes legal fault, see LeFavor v. Ford, 135 N.H. 311, 314 , 604 A.2d 570, 572 (1992), and may be used as evidence to prove breach of implied warranty. | 2 | 2 |
Island Shores Estates Condominium Ass'n v. City of Concordgreen2 sentences1995Assoc. v. City of Concord, 136 N.H. 300, 307 , 615 A.2d 629, 633 (1992). 1995Assoc. v. City of Concord, 136 N.H. 300, 307 , 615 A.2d 629, 633 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
Mease Ex Rel. Oliver v. Foxgreen1 sentence1995Mease v. Fox, 200 N.W.2d 791, 796 (Iowa 1972). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Johnsongreen1 sentence1972Frost v. Stevens, 88 N.H. 164, 167 , 184 A. 869, 872 (1936); Barton v.Plaisted, 109 N.H. 428, 437 , 256 A.2d 642, 648 (1969); see Gorman v. New Eng. | 1 | 1 |
Barton v. Plaistedgreen2 sentences1972Frost v. Stevens, 88 N.H. 164, 167 , 184 A. 869, 872 (1936); Barton v.Plaisted, 109 N.H. 428, 437 , 256 A.2d 642, 648 (1969); see Gorman v. New Eng. 1972Frost v. Stevens, 88 N.H. 164, 167 , 184 A. 869, 872 (1936); Barton v.Plaisted, 109 N.H. 428, 437 , 256 A.2d 642, 648 (1969); see Gorman v. New Eng. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bates v. Doria
green
1 sentence1995This causal requirement is necessary because “[w]ere such a connection not required, an employer would essentially be an insurer of the safety of every person who happens to come into contact with his employee simply because of his status as employee.” Bates, 502 N.E.2d at 459 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Frost v. Stevens
green
1 sentence1972Frost v. Stevens, 88 N.H. 164, 167 , 184 A. 869, 872 (1936); Barton v.Plaisted, 109 N.H. 428, 437 , 256 A.2d 642, 648 (1969); see Gorman v. New Eng. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
People v. Sehr
neutral
1 sentence1966Charbonneau v. MacRury, 84 N. H. 501, 509; Codding v. Makris, 104 N. H. 381; Rothacher v. Jones, 38 Ill. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.