Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Godfrey v. Princeton Theological Seminarygreen1 sentence2025Godfrey v. Princeton Theological Seminary, 196 N.J. 178, 196 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
Armando Rios, Jr. v. Meda Pharmaceutical, Inc. (084746) (Morris County & Statewide)green2 sentences2024In assessing a hostile environment claim, the focus "is on the harassing conduct itself and 'not its effect on the plaintiff or on the work environment.'" Ibid. (quoting Cutler, 196 N.J. at 431 ). 2024"Settled case law relies on an objective standard to evaluate a hostile environment claim." Rios, 247 N.J. at 12. | 1 | 1 |
Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.green2 sentences2010See Lehmann, supra, 132 N.J. at 603-04 , 626 A.2d 445 . 2010See Lehmann, supra, 132 N.J. at 603-04 , 626 A.2d 445 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cutler v. Dorn
green
2 sentences2024In assessing a hostile environment claim, the focus "is on the harassing conduct itself and 'not its effect on the plaintiff or on the work environment.'" Ibid. (quoting Cutler, 196 N.J. at 431 ). 2024In assessing a hostile environment claim, the focus "is on the harassing conduct itself and 'not its effect on the plaintiff or on the work environment.'" Ibid. (quoting Cutler, 196 N.J. at 431 ). | 2 | 2019–2024 |
Shepherd v. Hunterdon Developmental Center
green
2 sentences2004Shepherd v. Hunterdon Developmental Center, 174 N.J. 1 , 803 A.2d 611 (2002). 2004Shepherd v. Hunterdon Developmental Center, 174 N.J. 1 , 803 A.2d 611 (2002). | 2 | 2004–2004 |
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan
green
2 sentences2002While the Court held that discrete acts of discrimination cannot be revived based upon other similar discrete acts that are timely, the Court also distinguished hostile environment claims from discrimination claims based upon such "acts such as termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire." The Court found that hostile work environment claims differ from such discrete discrimination claims because the "very nature [of a hostile environment claim] involves repeated conduct." ___ U.S. at ___, 122 S.Ct. at 2073 , 153 L.Ed. 2d at 123 (citing 1 B. 2002While the Court held that discrete acts of discrimination cannot be revived based upon other similar discrete acts that are timely, the Court also distinguished hostile environment claims from discrimination claims based upon such "acts such as termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire." The Court found that hostile work environment claims differ from such discrete discrimination claims because the "very nature [of a hostile environment claim] involves repeated conduct." ___ U.S. at ___, 122 S.Ct. at 2073 , 153 L.Ed. 2d at 123 (citing 1 B. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.