Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1957–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Graham v. Connorgreen1 sentence2022Four years later, in Graham v. Connor, the Supreme Court “[made] explicit what was implicit in Garner’s analysis” and held that “all claims that law enforcement officers have used excessive force—deadly or not— in the course of an arrest, investigatory stop, or other ‘seizure’ of a free citizen should be analyzed 13 under the Fourth Amendment and its ‘reasonableness’ standard * * *.” (Emphasis sic.) Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 395 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Heidelberggreen1 sentence2022See State v. Heidelberg, 2019-Ohio-2257 , 138 13 Case No. 2022-A- 0041 N.E.3d 537 (6th Dist.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Houston
green
1 sentence2022Cuyahoga Nos. 106470 and 106055, 2018-Ohio-3043, ¶ 37-39 . {¶51} The Sixth District adopted Garner’s analysis in the context of a purported “mandatory” driver’s license suspension. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Lingo v. State
green
2 sentences2019Lingo v. State, 138 Ohio St.3d 427 , 2014-Ohio-1052 , 7 N.E.3d 1188, ¶ 48 . {¶7} Garner’s claim that the trial court erred by ordering two of the sentences on the GSI counts to be consecutively served is without merit. 2019Lingo v. State, 138 Ohio St.3d 427 , 2014-Ohio-1052 , 7 N.E.3d 1188, ¶ 48 . {¶7} Garner’s claim that the trial court erred by ordering two of the sentences on the GSI counts to be consecutively served is without merit. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Schlee
green
1 sentence2018“Courts may recast irregular motions into whatever category necessary to identify and establish the criteria by which the motion should be judged.” State v. Schlee, 117 Ohio St.3d 153 , 2008-Ohio-545 , 882 N.E.2d 431 , ¶ 12. {¶11} Pursuant to R.C. 2953.21(A)(1)(a), a convicted defendant “who claims that there was such a denial or infringement of the person’s rights as to render the judgment void or voidable under the Ohio Constitution or the Constitution of the United States,” may file a postconviction petition “asking the court to vacate or set aside the judgment or sentence * * *.” A motion | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Beeman
green
1 sentence2011The Ohio Supreme Court noted that “while guilt of aggravated murder requires proof of specific intent to kill, R.C. 2903.01 contemplates that such an intent may be inferred in a felony-murder when the offense and the manner of its commission would be likely to produce death.” Id. at 60 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Berkemer v. McCarty
green
1 sentence2007The safeguards prescribed by Miranda become applicable as soon as a suspect's freedom of action is curtailed to a "degree associated with formal arrest." Berkemer v. McCarty (1984), 468 U.S. 420 , 440 (citation omitted). {¶ 34} Following a hearing on Garner's motion, the trial court made the following relevant findings in its judgment entry, in support of its conclusion that Garner knowingly and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights, and provided his oral and written statements voluntarily: {¶ 35} "At the time of his arrest Defendant was mirandized by Patrolman Gerardi of the Willoughby Hills | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board
green
2 sentences1957The first is the case of Guss v. Utah Labor Board, 353 U. S. 1 (1957). 1957The first is the case of Guss v. Utah Labor Board, 353 U. S. 1 (1957). | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.