Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1895–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kemp v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See Kemp, 846 S.W.2d at 308 ; Archie, 221 S.W.3d at 700 ; Hawkins, 135 S.W.3d at 77 . | 1 | 1 |
Certified Ems, Inc. D/B/A Cpns Staffing v. Cherie Pottsgreen1 sentence2025See Scoresby, 346 S.W.3d at 557 ; see also Potts, 392 S.W.3d at 630 (“A report need not cover every alleged liability theory to make the defendant aware of the conduct that is at issue.”). | 1 | 1 |
Tyler Scoresby, M.D. v. Catarino Santillan, Individually and as Next Friend of Samuel Santillan, a Minorgreen1 sentence2025See Scoresby, 346 S.W.3d at 557 ; see also Potts, 392 S.W.3d at 630 (“A report need not cover every alleged liability theory to make the defendant aware of the conduct that is at issue.”). | 1 | 1 |
Suarez v. City of Texas Citygreen1 sentence2019See Suarez, 465 S.W.3d at 637 (dismissing the plaintiff’s claims against a governmental unit for lack of jurisdiction where the Recreational Use Statute applied and the plaintiff provided no evidence of gross negligence as required to waive the unit’s immunity). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Archie v. State
green
1 sentence2025See Kemp, 846 S.W.2d at 308 ; Archie, 221 S.W.3d at 700 ; Hawkins, 135 S.W.3d at 77 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Hawkins v. State
green
1 sentence2025See Kemp, 846 S.W.2d at 308 ; Archie, 221 S.W.3d at 700 ; Hawkins, 135 S.W.3d at 77 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Boyd
green
1 sentence2025App. P. 44.1(a)(1); Boyd, 177 S.W.3d at 921–23. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Braughton, Christopher Ernest
green
2 sentences2025Id. at 612 ; see also Perales v. State, 622 S.W.3d 575 , 582 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2021, pet. ref’d) (explaining that factfinder “was free to disregard appellant’s self-serving testimony”). 2025Braughton, 569 S.W.3d at 608 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Castillo v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
green
2 sentences1992On rehearing, appellees insist that we have abandoned our opinion of Castillo v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 663 S.W.2d 60 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1983, writ ref'd n.r.e.), by examining the questions before us under the Garner test. 1992On rehearing, appellees insist that we have abandoned our opinion of Castillo v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 663 S.W.2d 60 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1983, writ ref'd n.r.e.), by examining the questions before us under the Garner test. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Hexter v. Pratt
green
1 sentence1955Hexter v. Pratt, Tex.Com.App., 10 S.W.2d 692 ; Woodward v. Ortiz, 150 Tex. 75 , 237 S.W.2d 286 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Woodward v. Ortiz
green
2 sentences1955Hexter v. Pratt, Tex.Com.App., 10 S.W.2d 692 ; Woodward v. Ortiz, 150 Tex. 75 , 237 S.W.2d 286 . 1955Hexter v. Pratt, Tex.Com.App., 10 S.W.2d 692 ; Woodward v. Ortiz, 150 Tex. 75 , 237 S.W.2d 286 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Hennessy v. Woolworth
green
1 sentence1895“As the action for specific performance is strictly equitable, and as the performance of contract specifically is not a matter of right, but rests entirely in judicial discretion to be exercised according to settled principles of equity, but always with reference to the particular facts of the case” (Hennessey v. Woolworth, 128 U. S., 438 ), and as all the facts stand out conspicuously and clearly in this litigation from the inception of the contract to locate, in January, 1838, to the bringing of suit, on June 8, 1885, by plaintiffs, we will first examine into the nature of this particular co | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.