Marshall motion (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

Marshall motion in Ohio

7 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Marshallgreen
ohioctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025In making that finding, the common 4 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS pleas court noted that this court, in Marshall’s direct appeal, had held, in overruling Marshall’s challenge to the manifest weight of the evidence, that the evidence presented at trial “permitted a conclusion that would have excluded the driver as the shooter.” Marshall I, 2008-Ohio-955, at ¶ 56 (1st Dist.).

11
State v. Eleygreen
ohio · 1978 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024The brief states, "A criminal conviction challenged on such grounds shall stand so long as there exists sufficient evidence in the record 'which, if believed, would convince the average mind of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt'⎯that is, without any degree of uncertainty." This is a quotation from a discussion of sufficiency of the evidence in State v. Eley, 56 Ohio St.2d 169, 172 (1978), 3.

11
State v. Longgreen
ohio · 1978 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001See Long , supra , at 96-97.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Black green
ohioctapp · 2019
1 sentence

2022State v. Black, 2019-Ohio-4977 , 149 N.E.3d 1132 (8th Dist.).

12022–2022
Disciplinary Counsel v. Jackson green
ohio · 1998
2 sentences

2014V(6)(J); Disciplinary Counsel v. Jackson, 81 Ohio St.3d 308, 310 , 691 N.E.2d 262 (1998).

2014V(6)(J); Disciplinary Counsel v. Jackson, 81 Ohio St.3d 308, 310 , 691 N.E.2d 262 (1998).

12014–2014
Johnson v. City of Franklin green
ohioctapp · 1989
2 sentences

2004Johnson v. Franklin (1989), 64 Ohio App.3d 205 , 210 , 580 N.E.2d 1142 .

2004Johnson v. Franklin (1989), 64 Ohio App.3d 205 , 210 , 580 N.E.2d 1142 .

12004–2004
Mootispaw v. Eckstein green
ohio · 1996
2 sentences

1998Mootispaw v. Eckstein (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 383, 385 , 667 N.E.2d 1197, 1199 . {¶ 29} Marshall contends that the January 13, 1997 board resolution purporting to rescind any prior board resolutions authorizing payment of the V Group invoices and the prosecuting attorney’s January 10, 1997 complaint filed in common pleas court, both of which were attached to Marshall’s motion to dismiss, created genuine issues of material fact that precluded the entry of summary judgment in favor of the V Group. 9 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 30} As noted by the V Group, however, these documents could not be conside

1998Mootispaw v. Eckstein (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 383, 385 , 667 N.E.2d 1197, 1199 . {¶ 29} Marshall contends that the January 13, 1997 board resolution purporting to rescind any prior board resolutions authorizing payment of the V Group invoices and the prosecuting attorney’s January 10, 1997 complaint filed in common pleas court, both of which were attached to Marshall’s motion to dismiss, created genuine issues of material fact that precluded the entry of summary judgment in favor of the V Group. 9 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 30} As noted by the V Group, however, these documents could not be conside

11998–1998
State ex rel. Askew v. Goldhart green
ohio · 1996
2 sentences

1998Askew v. Goldhart (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 608, 610 , 665 N.E.2d 200, 202 . {¶ 12} The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion by effectively overruling Marshall’s motion to compel Voinovich’s deposition and granting the V Group’s motion to quash the notice of deposition.

1998Askew v. Goldhart (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 608, 610 , 665 N.E.2d 200, 202 . {¶ 12} The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion by effectively overruling Marshall’s motion to compel Voinovich’s deposition and granting the V Group’s motion to quash the notice of deposition.

11998–1998

Where else courts name it

TX 24 (1957–2023) WA 21 (2000–2024) GA 13 (1991–2021) CA 12 (1944–2022) FL 9 (1992–2018) VA 8 (1985–2026) OH 7 (1998–2025) NJ 6 (1991–2004) MD 6 (2008–2019) IL 6 (1986–2022) AK 4 (1979–2024) AL 4 (1969–2014) MS 3 (2003–2026) IN 3 (2008–2019) NM 3 (1988–2023) OR 3 (1986–2005) NY 3 (1976–2008) MO 2 (1904–2019) NE 2 (2005–2007) KS 2 (1992–2014) PA 2 (2023–2025) OK 2 (1997–2009) LA 2 (2013–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check