Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jae-Woo Cha v. Korean Presbyterian Churchgreen2 sentences2026Jae-Woo Cha applies to this claim and precludes our review, because “a plaintiff, in order to present a prima facie case of tortious interference, must allege and prove not only an intentional interference that caused the termination of the at-will contract, but also that the defendant employed improper methods.” 262 Va. at 613 (emphasis added) (noting that the - 16 - Our conclusion regarding appellants’ claims is supported by binding Virginia Supreme Court precedent and consistent with the Marshall factors. 2026Jae-Woo Cha applies to this claim and precludes our review, because “a plaintiff, in order to present a prima facie case of tortious interference, must allege and prove not only an intentional interference that caused the termination of the at-will contract, but also that the defendant employed improper methods.” 262 Va. at 613 (emphasis added) (noting that the - 16 - Our conclusion regarding appellants’ claims is supported by binding Virginia Supreme Court precedent and consistent with the Marshall factors. | 2 | 2 |
Barnabei v. Com.green2 sentences2024We disagree because Marshall has only shown a hope or suspicion that favorable evidence may be procured from the expert. “[A]n indigent defendant seeking the appointment of an expert has the burden of showing a particularized need therefor.” Barnabei v. Commonwealth, 252 Va. 161, 171 (1996). 2024We disagree because Marshall has only shown a hope or suspicion that favorable evidence may be procured from the expert. “[A]n indigent defendant seeking the appointment of an expert has the burden of showing a particularized need therefor.” Barnabei v. Commonwealth, 252 Va. 161, 171 (1996). | 2 | 2 |
Lee v. Spodengreen1 sentence2024See Lee, 290 Va. at 251 . | 1 | 1 |
City of Chesapeake v. Cunninghamgreen1 sentence2024See City of Chesapeake v. Cunningham, 268 Va. 624, 633 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
McMunn v. Tatumgreen2 sentences2004Marshall’s objection to this testimony was that Dr. Stein was not going to testify at trial and that, under McMunn v. Tatum, 237 Va. 558, 569 , 379 S.E.2d 908, 914 (1989), only Dr. Stein could testify whether the treatment. 2004Marshall’s objection to this testimony was that Dr. Stein was not going to testify at trial and that, under McMunn v. Tatum, 237 Va. 558, 569 , 379 S.E.2d 908, 914 (1989), only Dr. Stein could testify whether the treatment. | 1 | 1 |
Bowman v. State Bank of Keysvillegreen2 sentences1985A demurrer admits as true all material facts that are properly pleaded, Bowman v. State Bank of Keysville, 229 Va. 534, 536 , 331 S.E.2d 797, 798 (1985), and the facts germane to Bird’s special plea are undisputed. 1985A demurrer admits as true all material facts that are properly pleaded, Bowman v. State Bank of Keysville, 229 Va. 534, 536 , 331 S.E.2d 797, 798 (1985), and the facts germane to Bird’s special plea are undisputed. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.