recognizes rule (Oklahoma) · Go Syfert
← Oklahoma issues

recognizes rule in Oklahoma

7 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1915–2002 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Harris v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1968 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1974–1977
2 sentences

1977See Harris v. United States, 390 U.S. 234 , 88 S.Ct. 992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968) and Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971).” (Emphasis added).

1977See Harris v. United States, 390 U.S. 234 , 88 S.Ct. 992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968) and Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971).” (Emphasis added).

22
Coolidge v. New Hampshiregreen
scotus · 1971 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1974–1977
2 sentences

1977See Harris v. United States, 390 U.S. 234 , 88 S.Ct. 992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968) and Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971).” (Emphasis added).

1977See Harris v. United States, 390 U.S. 234 , 88 S.Ct. 992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968) and Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971).” (Emphasis added).

22
State v. Baxtergreen
oklacrimapp · 1974 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1977–1979
2 sentences

1979State v. Baxter, Okl.Cr., 528 P.2d 347 (1974).

1977Having determined that the officers properly stopped the defendants’ vehicle we are of the opinion that the facts of this case come well within the doctrine set forth in State v. Baxter, Okl.Cr., 528 P.2d 347, 349 (1974) wherein we stated: “This Court recognizes the rule of law that an officer, lawfully in any place may, without obtaining a search warrant, seize from a motor vehicle any item which he observes in plain or open view, if he has probable cause to believe that the item is contraband, a weapon, anything used in committing a crime, loot, or other evidence of crime.

12
Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. Stategreen
oklacrimapp · 1973 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
1 sentence

1977See Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. State, Okl.Cr., 509 P.2d 917 (1973); vacated on other grounds, 414 U.S. 967 , 94 S.Ct. 277 , 38 L.Ed.2d 212 (1973); conformed Okl.Cr., 533 P.2d 624 (1974); Smith v. California, supra; Mishkin v. New York, 383 U.S. 502 , 86 S.Ct. 958 , 16 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
J.M. v. State green
oklacivapp · 1993
2 sentences

2002This Court recognizes it is error for a trial court to terminate parental rights "where a parent's failure to correct the conditions is contributed to by the agents to whom is entrusted the duty to help salvage the family relationship." Matter of J.M., 1993 OK CIV APP 121 at ¶ 5 , 858 P.2d at 121 .

2002This Court recognizes it is error for a trial court to terminate parental rights “where a parent’s failure to correct the conditions is contributed to by the agents to whom is entrusted the duty to help salvage the family relationship.” Matter of J.M., 1993 OK CIV APP 121 at ¶ 5 , 858 P.2d at 121 .

22002–2002
Matter of JM green
oklacivapp · 1993
2 sentences

2002This Court recognizes it is error for a trial court to terminate parental rights "where a parent's failure to correct the conditions is contributed to by the agents to whom is entrusted the duty to help salvage the family relationship." Matter of J.M., 1993 OK CIV APP 121 at ¶ 5 , 858 P.2d at 121 .

2002This Court recognizes it is error for a trial court to terminate parental rights “where a parent’s failure to correct the conditions is contributed to by the agents to whom is entrusted the duty to help salvage the family relationship.” Matter of J.M., 1993 OK CIV APP 121 at ¶ 5 , 858 P.2d at 121 .

22002–2002
Mishkin v. New York green
scotus · 1966
2 sentences

1977See Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. State, Okl.Cr., 509 P.2d 917 (1973); vacated on other grounds, 414 U.S. 967 , 94 S.Ct. 277 , 38 L.Ed.2d 212 (1973); conformed Okl.Cr., 533 P.2d 624 (1974); Smith v. California, supra; Mishkin v. New York, 383 U.S. 502 , 86 S.Ct. 958 , 16 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966).

1977See Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. State, Okl.Cr., 509 P.2d 917 (1973); vacated on other grounds, 414 U.S. 967 , 94 S.Ct. 277 , 38 L.Ed.2d 212 (1973); conformed Okl.Cr., 533 P.2d 624 (1974); Smith v. California, supra; Mishkin v. New York, 383 U.S. 502 , 86 S.Ct. 958 , 16 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966).

11977–1977
Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. State neutral
oklacrimapp · 1974
1 sentence

1977See Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. State, Okl.Cr., 509 P.2d 917 (1973); vacated on other grounds, 414 U.S. 967 , 94 S.Ct. 277 , 38 L.Ed.2d 212 (1973); conformed Okl.Cr., 533 P.2d 624 (1974); Smith v. California, supra; Mishkin v. New York, 383 U.S. 502 , 86 S.Ct. 958 , 16 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966).

11977–1977
McCrary v. Oklahoma green
scotus · 1973
1 sentence

1977See Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. State, Okl.Cr., 509 P.2d 917 (1973); vacated on other grounds, 414 U.S. 967 , 94 S.Ct. 277 , 38 L.Ed.2d 212 (1973); conformed Okl.Cr., 533 P.2d 624 (1974); Smith v. California, supra; Mishkin v. New York, 383 U.S. 502 , 86 S.Ct. 958 , 16 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966).

11977–1977
Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. Oklahoma neutral
scotus · 1973
2 sentences

1977See Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. State, Okl.Cr., 509 P.2d 917 (1973); vacated on other grounds, 414 U.S. 967 , 94 S.Ct. 277 , 38 L.Ed.2d 212 (1973); conformed Okl.Cr., 533 P.2d 624 (1974); Smith v. California, supra; Mishkin v. New York, 383 U.S. 502 , 86 S.Ct. 958 , 16 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966).

1977See Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. State, Okl.Cr., 509 P.2d 917 (1973); vacated on other grounds, 414 U.S. 967 , 94 S.Ct. 277 , 38 L.Ed.2d 212 (1973); conformed Okl.Cr., 533 P.2d 624 (1974); Smith v. California, supra; Mishkin v. New York, 383 U.S. 502 , 86 S.Ct. 958 , 16 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966).

11977–1977
Tomaselli v. John Griffiths Cycle Corp. green
· 1896
2 sentences

1915The defendant in error’s brief cites Hicks v. Davis, 32 Okla. 195 , 120 Pac. 260 ; Henry v. Kaw Boiler Works, 87 Kan. 571 , 125 Pac. 67 ; Tomaselli v. John Griffiths Cycle Corporation, 9 App. Div. 127 , 41 N. Y.

1915The defendant in error’s brief cites Hicks v. Davis, 32 Okla. 195 , 120 Pac. 260 ; Henry v. Kaw Boiler Works, 87 Kan. 571 , 125 Pac. 67 ; Tomaselli v. John Griffiths Cycle Corporation, 9 App. Div. 127 , 41 N. Y.

11915–1915
Henry v. Kaw Boiler Works neutral
kan · 1912
2 sentences

1915The defendant in error’s brief cites Hicks v. Davis, 32 Okla. 195 , 120 Pac. 260 ; Henry v. Kaw Boiler Works, 87 Kan. 571 , 125 Pac. 67 ; Tomaselli v. John Griffiths Cycle Corporation, 9 App. Div. 127 , 41 N. Y.

1915The defendant in error’s brief cites Hicks v. Davis, 32 Okla. 195 , 120 Pac. 260 ; Henry v. Kaw Boiler Works, 87 Kan. 571 , 125 Pac. 67 ; Tomaselli v. John Griffiths Cycle Corporation, 9 App. Div. 127 , 41 N. Y.

11915–1915
Hicks v. Davis neutral
okla · 1912
2 sentences

1915The defendant in error’s brief cites Hicks v. Davis, 32 Okla. 195 , 120 Pac. 260 ; Henry v. Kaw Boiler Works, 87 Kan. 571 , 125 Pac. 67 ; Tomaselli v. John Griffiths Cycle Corporation, 9 App. Div. 127 , 41 N. Y.

1915The defendant in error’s brief cites Hicks v. Davis, 32 Okla. 195 , 120 Pac. 260 ; Henry v. Kaw Boiler Works, 87 Kan. 571 , 125 Pac. 67 ; Tomaselli v. John Griffiths Cycle Corporation, 9 App. Div. 127 , 41 N. Y.

11915–1915

Where else courts name it

IL 19 (1899–2025) MS 15 (1961–2019) NY 14 (1855–2006) TX 14 (1872–2008) AL 13 (1852–2017) WA 11 (1974–2018) MO 9 (1901–2001) LA 8 (1949–2017) CA 8 (1962–2022) PA 8 (1837–2018) FL 8 (1930–2006) OK 7 (1915–2002) CO 6 (1894–2018) NC 6 (1903–2003) ID 6 (1899–2010) WV 6 (1904–2013) KY 5 (1881–2016) KS 5 (1943–1967) MD 5 (1941–2006) OH 4 (1955–2000) CT 4 (1940–2001) IA 4 (1929–1988) GA 4 (1948–1968) DE 4 (2020–2024) AZ 4 (1968–2007) DC 4 (1989–2011) NJ 3 (1978–1988) SD 3 (1940–1997) MT 3 (1988–2007) MI 3 (1887–1946) NM 3 (1910–2002) RI 3 (2008–2009) ME 2 (1911–2020) WI 2 (1972–1976) NE 2 (1943–1947) MA 2 (1987–2024) SC 2 (2008–2024) WY 2 (2000–2024) IN 2 (1902–1949)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check