Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 2005–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Love v. Cramergreen2 sentences2014Love, 606 A.2d at 1179 . [Appellant] neither averred any discrete, identifiable traumatic incident that would give rise to a NIED claim nor alleged that he sustained any physical harm, so he cannot maintain a claim for NIED. 2014Love, 606 A.2d at 1179 . [Appellant] neither averred any discrete, identifiable traumatic incident that would give rise to a NIED claim nor alleged that he sustained any physical harm, so he cannot maintain a claim for NIED. | 1 | 3 |
Sinn v. Burdgreen2 sentences2012Sinn v. Burd, 486 Pa. 146, 170-171 , 404 A.2d 672, 685 (1979). 2012Sinn v. Burd, 486 Pa. 146, 170-171 , 404 A.2d 672, 685 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
Toney v. Chester County Hospitalgreen2 sentences2012The result in Toney v. Chester County Hosp., 961 A.2d 192, 198 (Pa.Super.2008) (era banc), order aff'd by equally divided court, 36 A.3d 83 (Pa.2011), which dealt with an NIED claim, does not change our conclusion that witnessing the event is required for an IIED claim, as per the Restatement text above. 2012The result in Toney v. Chester County Hosp., 961 A.2d 192, 198 (Pa.Super.2008) (era banc), order aff'd by equally divided court, 36 A.3d 83 (Pa.2011), which dealt with an NIED claim, does not change our conclusion that witnessing the event is required for an IIED claim, as per the Restatement text above. | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicinegreen2 sentences2011Similarly, she suggests that the Superior Court in Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, 449 Pa.Super. 667 , 674 A.2d 1130, 1184 (1996), strained to uphold a plaintiffs verdict on her NIED claim based upon an impact rule analysis, where the impact was slight. 2011Similarly, she suggests that the Superior Court in Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, 449 Pa.Super. 667 , 674 A.2d 1130, 1184 (1996), strained to uphold a plaintiffs verdict on her NIED claim based upon an impact rule analysis, where the impact was slight. | 1 | 1 |
Hoy v. Angelonegreen2 sentences2005Relying upon the Restatement (Second) of Torts §46(1), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court defined TIED by stating “[o]ne who by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another is subject to liability for such emotional distress, and if bodily harm to the other re- suits from it, for such bodily harm.” Hoy v. Angelone, 554 Pa. 134, 150 , 720 A.2d 745, 753 (1998). 2005Relying upon the Restatement (Second) of Torts §46(1), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court defined TIED by stating “[o]ne who by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another is subject to liability for such emotional distress, and if bodily harm to the other re- suits from it, for such bodily harm.” Hoy v. Angelone, 554 Pa. 134, 150 , 720 A.2d 745, 753 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bloom v. DuBois Regional Medical Center
green
2 sentences2015Id. at 682 . 2015Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Riffe v. Vereb Ambulance Service, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2015Id. at 1077 . 2015Id. at 1077 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Grant v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
green
2 sentences2012The result in Toney v. Chester County Hosp., 961 A.2d 192, 198 (Pa.Super.2008) (era banc), order aff'd by equally divided court, 36 A.3d 83 (Pa.2011), which dealt with an NIED claim, does not change our conclusion that witnessing the event is required for an IIED claim, as per the Restatement text above. 2012The result in Toney v. Chester County Hosp., 961 A.2d 192, 198 (Pa.Super.2008) (era banc), order aff'd by equally divided court, 36 A.3d 83 (Pa.2011), which dealt with an NIED claim, does not change our conclusion that witnessing the event is required for an IIED claim, as per the Restatement text above. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Pasquale v. Speed Products Engineering
green
2 sentences2011Id., 211 IlLDec. 314, 654 N.E.2d at 1372-73 . 2011Id., 211 IlLDec. 314, 654 N.E.2d at 1372-73 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.