Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
J.E. Archer v. Rockwood Area SD & Somerset Area SDgreen1 sentence2023Archer, 249 A.3d at 627 (Leadbetter, S.J., dissenting). 8 a severely deficient school district in order to show educational merit. | 1 | 1 |
K.B. v. M.F.green1 sentence2021K.B. v. M.F., 247 A.3d 1146, 1154 (Pa. Super. 2021). | 1 | 1 |
Carney, K. v. Carney, D.green1 sentence2018See Carney, supra at 131 . | 1 | 1 |
Ks v. Com. Dept. of Public Welfaregreen1 sentence1992We said that whether K.S. personally committed child abuse was not conclusive but because J.S. sustained severe physical injuries while K.S. was primary caregiver “K.S.’ omissions ( ... failure to protect or leave the child in the hands of a responsible caretaker) alone fulfill the definitions of both ‘child abuse’ and ‘perpetrator’.... ” Id. at 37, 564 A.2d at 564 (emphasis in original). | 1 | 1 |
Pennsylvania State Police v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence1990See also Pennsylvania State Police v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, 127 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 436, 561 A.2d 1320 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ashford v. Ashford
green
1 sentence2021This de novo hearing may not be a “rubber stamp approval of the recommendation of the hearing officer,” id., especially in light of the trial court’s duty to conduct an independent review of the record to determine whether the hearing officer’s findings and recommendations were appropriate. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
T.E.B. v. C.A.B.
green
1 sentence2019Even if the appellant had preserved the issue, we held that the trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in adopting the recommendation of the hearing officer because “the hearing officer was highly conscientious in discerning the child’s - 14 - best interests, and recommended a custody arrangement that equitably balanced the competing interests of all persons involved.” C.A.B., 74 A.3d at 179 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Fisler v. State System of Higher Education
green
2 sentences2014Fisler, 78 A.3d at 42 ; (Policy § L.1, R.R. at 547a (“The chancellor or his designee shall conduct hearings for university employees and...[t]he chancellor...[is] hereby authorized to retain hearing officers to conduct hearings and issue recommendatory adjudications.”).) Therefore, the Chancellor was not bound by the recommendation of the hearing officer, Fisler, 78 A.3d at 42 , and both parties were afforded the opportunity to, and did, submit briefs to the Chancellor to advocate on the merits of the hearing officer’s proposed adjudication prior to the issuance of the final adjudication. 2014Fisler, 78 A.3d at 42 ; (Policy § L.1, R.R. at 547a (“The chancellor or his designee shall conduct hearings for university employees and...[t]he chancellor...[is] hereby authorized to retain hearing officers to conduct hearings and issue recommendatory adjudications.”).) Therefore, the Chancellor was not bound by the recommendation of the hearing officer, Fisler, 78 A.3d at 42 , and both parties were afforded the opportunity to, and did, submit briefs to the Chancellor to advocate on the merits of the hearing officer’s proposed adjudication prior to the issuance of the final adjudication. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. Forbes Health System
green
2 sentences1989Hence, this appeal. 6 In Department of Public Welfare v. Forbes Health System, 492 Pa. 77 , 422 A.2d 480 (1980), the Supreme Court outlined two principles with respect to review of an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations. 1989Hence, this appeal. 6 In Department of Public Welfare v. Forbes Health System, 492 Pa. 77 , 422 A.2d 480 (1980), the Supreme Court outlined two principles with respect to review of an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.