7 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tarvis v. Morangreen2 sentences2009“The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” Tarvis v. Moran, 551 A.2d 699, 700 (R.I.1988) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 686 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ). 2006“The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” Tarvis, 551 A.2d at 700 (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 686 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ). | 2 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2010Recently, our Supreme Court stated that it "will reject an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel `unless the attorney's representation [was] so lacking that the trial has become a farce and a mockery of justice.'" Moniz v. State , 933 A.2d 691 , 696 (R.I. 2007) (quoting State v. Dunn , 726 A.2d 1142 , 1146 n. 4 (R.I. 1999) (alteration in original)). "`The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.'" Heath , 747 2009“The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” Tarvis v. Moran, 551 A.2d 699, 700 (R.I.1988) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 686 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ). | 5 | 1993–2010 |
Heath v. Vose
green
2 sentences2011"The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result." Heath , 747 A.2d at 478 (quoting Strickland , 466 U.S. at 686 ). *Page 4 Also, the Heath Court stated that this determination must be made "based on the totality of the omissions [allegedly] committed" by petitioner's attorney. 2010"The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result." Heath , 747 A.2d at 478 (quoting Strickland , 466 U.S. 686 ). | 4 | 2008–2011 |
State v. Dunn
green
2 sentences2010Recently, our Supreme Court stated that it "will reject an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel `unless the attorney's representation [was] so lacking that the trial has become a farce and a mockery of justice.'" Moniz v. State , 933 A.2d 691 , 696 (R.I. 2007) (quoting State v. Dunn , 726 A.2d 1142 , 1146 n. 4 (R.I. 1999) (alteration in original)). "`The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.'" Heath , 747 2008Recently, our Supreme Court stated that it "will reject an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel `unless the attorney's representation [was] so lacking that the trial has become a farce and a mockery of justice.'" Moniz v. State , 933 A.2d 691 , 696 (R.I. 2007) (quoting State v. Dunn , 726 A.2d 1142 , 1146 n. 4 (R.I. 1999) (alteration in original)). "`The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.'" Heath , 747 | 2 | 2008–2010 |
Moniz v. State
green
2 sentences2010Recently, our Supreme Court stated that it "will reject an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel `unless the attorney's representation [was] so lacking that the trial has become a farce and a mockery of justice.'" Moniz v. State , 933 A.2d 691 , 696 (R.I. 2007) (quoting State v. Dunn , 726 A.2d 1142 , 1146 n. 4 (R.I. 1999) (alteration in original)). "`The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.'" Heath , 747 2008Recently, our Supreme Court stated that it "will reject an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel `unless the attorney's representation [was] so lacking that the trial has become a farce and a mockery of justice.'" Moniz v. State , 933 A.2d 691 , 696 (R.I. 2007) (quoting State v. Dunn , 726 A.2d 1142 , 1146 n. 4 (R.I. 1999) (alteration in original)). "`The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.'" Heath , 747 | 2 | 2008–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.