Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rutherford v. Stategreen2 sentences2007“The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 219 (Fla.1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 686 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ). 2005The two prongs are related, in that "the benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result." Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 219 (Fla.1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 686 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Richardsongreen1 sentence2015“The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” State v. Richardson, 963 So.2d 267, 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (second alteration in original) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2018"The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result." Id. 2007“The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 219 (Fla.1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 686 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ). | 7 | 1990–2018 |
Hill v. Lockhart
green
2 sentences2006Subsequently, in Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 58 , 106 S.Ct. 366 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985), the Court applied the Strickland test to claims of ineffective assistance in pleading guilty to a crime. 2006Subsequently, in Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 58 , 106 S.Ct. 366 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985), the Court applied the Strickland test to claims of ineffective assistance in pleading guilty to a crime. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Downs v. State
green
1 sentence1990Strickland was adopted by the Florida Supreme Court in Downs v. State, 453 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1984) and State v. Bucherie, 468 So.2d 229 (Fla.1985). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Bucherie
green
1 sentence1990Strickland was adopted by the Florida Supreme Court in Downs v. State, 453 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1984) and State v. Bucherie, 468 So.2d 229 (Fla.1985). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.