7 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1964–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Capital Properties, Inc. v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Relying on this Court’s decisions in Parente v. Southworth, 448 A.2d 769, 772 (R.I.1982) and Capital Properties, Inc. v. State, 749 A.2d 1069, 1080 (R.I.1999), the hearing justice ruled that “Rules 18 and 20 of the Rules of the Rhode Island Superior Court allow for claims of this nature, meaning a declaratory judgment claim, to be combined with a claim or request for injunctive relief.” He entered an order granting declaratory relief, and defendants filed a timely notice of appeal. 3 A single justice of this Court ordered the parties to show cause why we should not decide this appeal summarily | 1 | 1 |
Parente v. Southworthgreen1 sentence2003Relying on this Court’s decisions in Parente v. Southworth, 448 A.2d 769, 772 (R.I.1982) and Capital Properties, Inc. v. State, 749 A.2d 1069, 1080 (R.I.1999), the hearing justice ruled that “Rules 18 and 20 of the Rules of the Rhode Island Superior Court allow for claims of this nature, meaning a declaratory judgment claim, to be combined with a claim or request for injunctive relief.” He entered an order granting declaratory relief, and defendants filed a timely notice of appeal. 3 A single justice of this Court ordered the parties to show cause why we should not decide this appeal summarily | 1 | 1 |
cluster 728734green1 sentence2001See id. at 1443 . | 1 | 1 |
Cimasi v. City Of Fenton, Missourigreen1 sentence1997Winter v. Northcutt , 879 S.W.2d 701 , 707 (Mo. App. S.D. 1994); See also Cimasi v. City of Fenton , 838 F.2d 298 , 299 (8th Cir. 1988) (exception did not apply to plaintiff who sought declaratory judgment and injunctive relief); AIU Ins. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DeMarco v. Travelers Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence2019The *526 Alveses submitted a motion requesting that the declaratory-judgment action be given priority, and the Superior Court granted that motion. 10 At the declaratory-judgment hearing, the Alveses opened by stating that, under Asermely and its progeny, this Court had created a "duty of good faith and fair dealing" on the part of an insurance company "that runs to both * * * the first party claimant insured and also to third party claimants." The Alveses also stated that an assignment was not required to activate the duty, arguing that the facts of both Asermely and DeMarco v. Travelers Insur | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Burns v. Sundlun
green
1 sentence2009Decision at 5 (citing Burns v. Sundlun , 617 A.2d 114 , 116 (R.I. 1992); M.B.T. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Solas v. Emergency Hiring Council
green
1 sentence2002The defendants argue that this Court must apply the amended definition to the declaratory judgment claim, in keeping with our Supreme Court's decisions in Solas v. Emergency Hiring Council of R.I., 774 A.2d 820 (R.I. 2001) and Dunbar v. Tammelleo, 673 A.2d 1063 (R.I. 1996). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Dunbar v. Tammelleo
green
1 sentence2002The defendants argue that this Court must apply the amended definition to the declaratory judgment claim, in keeping with our Supreme Court's decisions in Solas v. Emergency Hiring Council of R.I., 774 A.2d 820 (R.I. 2001) and Dunbar v. Tammelleo, 673 A.2d 1063 (R.I. 1996). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Winter v. Northcutt
green
1 sentence1997Winter v. Northcutt , 879 S.W.2d 701 , 707 (Mo. App. S.D. 1994); See also Cimasi v. City of Fenton , 838 F.2d 298 , 299 (8th Cir. 1988) (exception did not apply to plaintiff who sought declaratory judgment and injunctive relief); AIU Ins. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Newport Amusement Company v. Maher
green
1 sentence1964I. 51, 166 A.2d 216 , we pointed out that the proper remedy for appellate review on a petition for a declaratory judgment was by claim of appeal and not by a bill of exceptions. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.