Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1967–2026 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marinich v. Special Edition Custom Homes, LLCgreen2 sentences2025See Marinich v. Special Edition Custom Homes, LLC, 1 So. 3d 1197, 1200 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); see also Fla. R. 2024Cf. Marinich v. Special Edition Custom Homes, LLC, 1 So. 3d 1197, 1200 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ("Because the claims in the pending counterclaim are legally interrelated and arise from the same transaction as the declaratory judgment claim, the partial summary judgment is not final for purposes of appeal."). 2 | 2 | 2 |
May v. Holleygreen2 sentences2018See May v. Holley , 59 So.2d 636 , 639 (Fla. 1952) (outlining elements of a proper declaratory judgment claim). 2018See May v. Holley , 59 So.2d 636 , 639 (Fla. 1952) (outlining elements of a proper declaratory judgment claim). | 2 | 2 |
Gulf Power Co. v. Harpergreen1 sentence2026We note, however, that because the partial final judgment is not an appealable final order, the City shall be "free to move for reconsideration of [this] order at any time prior to the entry of final judgment." Proino Breakfast Club, II, Inc. v. OGI Cap., Inc., 331 So. 3d 846 , 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021); see also Gulf Power Co. v. Harper, 940 So. 2d 535, 536-37 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (concluding that an order resolving a declaratory judgment claim, involving the same factual setting and parties, was "non-final and non-appealable" where other interrelated claims remained outstanding). | 1 | 1 |
Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co. v. Javellanagreen1 sentence2025See, e.g., Tower Hill Signature Ins. v. Javellana, 238 So. 3d 372 , 375-77 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (breach of contract); Polk Cnty. v. Highlands-in- the-Woods, LLC, 227 So. 3d 161 , 163-64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (inverse condemnation). | 1 | 1 |
WAYNE GOLDMAN, MARIANNE GOLDMAN & SEAN ACOSTA v. STEPHEN LUSTIG, JOSEPH F. IERACITANOgreen1 sentence2023Notwithstanding, we also have recognized that “to the extent that the dismissal is based upon a legal determination, our review is de novo.” Goldman v. Lustig, 237 So. 3d 381, 384 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (quoting Bloch v. Del Rey, 208 So. 3d 189, 192 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)). | 1 | 1 |
Bloch v. Del Reygreen1 sentence2023Notwithstanding, we also have recognized that “to the extent that the dismissal is based upon a legal determination, our review is de novo.” Goldman v. Lustig, 237 So. 3d 381, 384 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (quoting Bloch v. Del Rey, 208 So. 3d 189, 192 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)). | 1 | 1 |
Bryant v. Stategreen1 sentence2022See Bryant v. State, 901 So. 2d 810, 822 (Fla. 2005). 2 This includes NCI’s declaratory judgment claim, which is inextricably intertwined with its breach of contract claim. | 1 | 1 |
Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beachgreen1 sentence2021Volusia Cnty. v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So. 2d 126, 130 (Fla. 2000). | 1 | 1 |
Dent v. Belingreen1 sentence2018See id. (finding a party is entitled to a declaration when that party pleads the necessary factual allegations for each element of a declaratory judgment claim). | 1 | 1 |
The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.red1 sentence2018Absent that, there is no basis for concluding that it would be unfair, unjust, or unreasonable to hold that party to his bargain.” (quoting Manrique, 128 So. 2d at 440 n.4 (quoting M/S Breman v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 18 (1972)))). 6 and loyalty, unfair competition, intentional interference, and civil conspiracy. | 1 | 1 |
Olive v. Maasgreen1 sentence2015Olive v. Maas, 811 So.2d 644, 657-58 (Fla.2002) (quoting Martinez v. Scanlan, 582 So.2d 1167, 1170-71 (Fla.1991)) (emphasis added; original emphasis omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Martinez v. Scanlangreen1 sentence2015Olive v. Maas, 811 So.2d 644, 657-58 (Fla.2002) (quoting Martinez v. Scanlan, 582 So.2d 1167, 1170-71 (Fla.1991)) (emphasis added; original emphasis omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Polk County v. Highlands-In-The-Woods, L.L.C.
green
1 sentence2025See, e.g., Tower Hill Signature Ins. v. Javellana, 238 So. 3d 372 , 375-77 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (breach of contract); Polk Cnty. v. Highlands-in- the-Woods, LLC, 227 So. 3d 161 , 163-64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (inverse condemnation). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Bill Stroop Roofing, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County
green
1 sentence2024In denying Appellants’ motions to dismiss as to the declaratory judgment claims, the trial court cited Bill Stroop Roofing, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 788 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), as a case where the court allowed a declaratory judgment claim to proceed against the government under similar circumstances. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Abruzzo v. Haller
green
1 sentence2017Id. *466 In determining that there was no case or controversy to address with respect to Cross-Appellants/Appellees’ counterclaim, the trial court relied upon its determination that the individual Cross-Appellants/Appellees were not and could not be subject to the provisions of section 790.33(3) because there “has been no enactment or adoption of a new ordinance relating to the regulation of firearms that they voted to enact or adopt” and because the continued re-publication of ordinances enacted years before the enactment of section 790.33(3) did not constitute promulgation as the term is use | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Harris v. Aberdeen Property Owners Ass'n
green
1 sentence2015Id. at 368-69 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Golf Club v. City of Plantation
green
1 sentence2003In Golf Club of Plantation, Inc. v. City of Plantation, 717 So.2d 166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), we affirmed the dismissal of the declaratory judgment claim, holding that by seeking damages from inverse condemnation Owner waived any challenge to the validity of the City’s restrictions. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Hankins v. Title and Trust Company of Florida
green
1 sentence1967Hankins v. Title and Trust Company, Fla. App.1964, 169 So.2d 526 ; Johnson v. Thoburn, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 729 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Johnson v. Thoburn
neutral
1 sentence1967Hankins v. Title and Trust Company, Fla. App.1964, 169 So.2d 526 ; Johnson v. Thoburn, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 729 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.