exact instruction (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

exact instruction in Tennessee

7 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1948–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Reidgreen
tenn · 2002 · cited in 2 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2003–2005
2 sentences

2005This exact instruction was recommended by our supreme court in Nesbit, 978 S.W.2d at 892 , and discussed by the high court in State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247, 283 (Tenn.2002).

2003This exact instruction was recommended by our supreme court in Nesbit, 978 S.W.2d at 892 , and discussed by the high court in State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247, 283 (Tenn. 2002).

22
State v. Nicholsgreen
tenn · 1994 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019See Nichols, 877 S.W.2d at 732-33 .

11
State v. Bushgreen
tenn · 1997 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006State v. Hall, 976 S.W.2d 121, 159 (Tenn. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1089 , 119 S. Ct. 1501 (1999); State v. Bush, 942 S.W.2d 489, 520-521 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 953 , 118 S. Ct. 376 (1997); Scott v. State, No. 01C01-9709-CR-00400, 1999 WL 233643 , at **9-10 (Tenn. Crim.

11
State v. Hallgreen
tenn · 1998 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006State v. Hall, 976 S.W.2d 121, 159 (Tenn. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1089 , 119 S. Ct. 1501 (1999); State v. Bush, 942 S.W.2d 489, 520-521 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 953 , 118 S. Ct. 376 (1997); Scott v. State, No. 01C01-9709-CR-00400, 1999 WL 233643 , at **9-10 (Tenn. Crim.

11
State v. Danielsgreen
tenncrimapp · 1975 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
1 sentence

1982In State v. Daniels, 531 S.W.2d 795, 801-802 (Tenn.Cr.App.1975), the exact rule as to when jeopardy attaches in a non-jury trial is set forth as follows: (W)hen a defendant is placed on trial (1) on an indictment, presentment (or other charging instrument), (2) before a court of competent jurisdiction, (3) before a competent judge who is present and ready to sit as a trier of the facts, (4) after a valid waiver is executed by the defendant, (5) after the entry of his plea, and (6) after the witnesses are sworn, whether they be sworn singly or in a group.

11
Ashby v. Stategreen
ca10 · 1911 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 1948–1948
1 sentence

1948The exact rule on the limitation of the probative effect of a confession has been stated by a former Chief Justice of this Court as follows: “The rule upon this subject, as announced by the later authorities, and the great weight of authority, is that, while the corpus delicti cannot be established by confessions alone, yet the confessions may be taken in connection with other evidence, direct or circumstantial, corroborating them, and, if from all of the evidence so considered together the corpus delicti and the guilt of the person with reference thereto is established beyond a reasonable dou

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Nesbit green
tenn · 1998
2 sentences

2005This exact instruction was recommended by our supreme court in Nesbit, 978 S.W.2d at 892 , and discussed by the high court in State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247, 283 (Tenn.2002).

2003This exact instruction was recommended by our supreme court in Nesbit, 978 S.W.2d at 892 , and discussed by the high court in State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247, 283 (Tenn. 2002).

22003–2005
Terhune v. McBath green
scotus · 1997
1 sentence

2006State v. Hall, 976 S.W.2d 121, 159 (Tenn. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1089 , 119 S. Ct. 1501 (1999); State v. Bush, 942 S.W.2d 489, 520-521 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 953 , 118 S. Ct. 376 (1997); Scott v. State, No. 01C01-9709-CR-00400, 1999 WL 233643 , at **9-10 (Tenn. Crim.

12006–2006
Mohamed v. United States green
scotus · 1999
1 sentence

2006State v. Hall, 976 S.W.2d 121, 159 (Tenn. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1089 , 119 S. Ct. 1501 (1999); State v. Bush, 942 S.W.2d 489, 520-521 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 953 , 118 S. Ct. 376 (1997); Scott v. State, No. 01C01-9709-CR-00400, 1999 WL 233643 , at **9-10 (Tenn. Crim.

12006–2006
Gibbs v. Johnson green
scotus · 1999
1 sentence

2006State v. Hall, 976 S.W.2d 121, 159 (Tenn. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1089 , 119 S. Ct. 1501 (1999); State v. Bush, 942 S.W.2d 489, 520-521 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 953 , 118 S. Ct. 376 (1997); Scott v. State, No. 01C01-9709-CR-00400, 1999 WL 233643 , at **9-10 (Tenn. Crim.

12006–2006
Bonnette v. Clow green
sc · 1922
1 sentence

2006State v. Hall, 976 S.W.2d 121, 159 (Tenn. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1089 , 119 S. Ct. 1501 (1999); State v. Bush, 942 S.W.2d 489, 520-521 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 953 , 118 S. Ct. 376 (1997); Scott v. State, No. 01C01-9709-CR-00400, 1999 WL 233643 , at **9-10 (Tenn. Crim.

12006–2006
Woodroof v. City of Nashville green
tenn · 1946
1 sentence

1961The exact rule as announced in Woodroof v. City of Nashville, supra, case is: “Another rule of statutory interpretation is that a special statute or a special provision of a particular statute controls a general provision in another statute or a general provision in the same statute.” [ 183 Tenn. 483 , 192 S.W.2d 1015 .] Beginning with the enactment of Ch. 17, Acts of 1799, the legislative body of our government has made special provision for the holding of elections.

11961–1961
Record v. Cooperage Co. green
tenn · 1902
1 sentence

1948But aside from the failure to prove the corpus delicti if we apply in strictness, the rule announced in Record v. Chickasaw Cooperage Co., 108 Tenn. 657 , 69 S. W. 334 , the case must be reversed (1) on account of the State’s action in impeaching its own witness, and (2) introducing the former statement which contradicted the sworn testimony of the daughter on the witness stand.

11948–1948

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-204 (4) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-206 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 40 (1921–2024) MS 32 (1932–2023) IL 29 (1951–2026) PA 27 (1934–2025) SC 26 (2005–2024) TX 26 (1914–2026) NC 24 (1951–2024) MO 21 (1900–2025) FL 19 (1958–2024) AL 13 (1895–2013) WA 13 (1911–2025) OH 12 (1982–2023) KS 11 (1893–2026) NY 10 (1959–2023) IN 9 (1955–2014) GA 8 (1892–2012) MI 8 (1972–2023) LA 8 (1921–2013) MD 7 (1902–2025) TN 7 (1948–2019) WV 6 (1913–2023) NE 6 (1909–2016) CT 6 (1994–2007) KY 6 (1933–2025) IA 5 (1911–2025) OK 5 (1960–2013) MT 5 (1933–2021) VT 5 (1987–2023) ID 4 (1985–2019) AZ 4 (1984–2026) CO 4 (1955–2021) WY 3 (1934–2009) WI 3 (1969–2013) AR 3 (1942–2026) ND 3 (1954–2022) OR 3 (1911–2026) MN 3 (1955–2012) NM 3 (1948–2025) NH 2 (1990–2014) HI 2 (1935–2007) UT 2 (2014–2016) VA 2 (1932–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check