Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1911–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sledge v. Continental Cas. Co.green1 sentence1997See, e.g., Sledge v. Continental Casualty Co., 639 So.2d 805, 813 (La.Ct.App.1994) (citing Van Riper for the rule: "`violation of law' exclusion in life insurance policy applied only to criminal acts of a serious nature"); see also Trevathan v. Mutual Life Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Sandberg v. Cavanaugh Timber Co.green2 sentences1927See, also, Sandberg v. Cavanaugh Timber Co., 95 Wash. 556 , 164 Pac. 200 . 1927See, also, Sandberg v. Cavanaugh Timber Co., 95 Wash. 556 , 164 Pac. 200 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
County of Sacramento v. Lewis
green
2 sentences2008In order to preserve “constitutional proportions of substantive due process,” a court must -undertake “an exact analysis of circumstances before any abuse of power is condemned as conscience shocking.” [County of Sacramento v.] Lewis, 523 U.S. [833,] 850 [, 118 S. Ct. 1708 , 140 L. 2008In order to preserve “constitutional proportions of substantive due process,” a court must -undertake “an exact analysis of circumstances before any abuse of power is condemned as conscience shocking.” [County of Sacramento v.] Lewis, 523 U.S. [833,] 850 [, 118 S. Ct. 1708 , 140 L. | 4 | 2003–2008 |
Ernest Lee Brazzel v. State of Washington v. Alice Payne
green
2 sentences2009Brazzel, 491 F.3d at 984 . [10] This decision and reasoning is on point and persuasive. *715 ¶ 18 Ironically the "unable to agree" instruction was first adopted in part to avoid problems attendant with hung juries. 2009Brazzel, 491 F.3d at 984 . 10 This decision and reasoning is on point and persuasive. ¶18 Ironically the “unable to agree” instruction was first adopted in part to avoid problems attendant with hung juries. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Johnson v. California
green
2 sentences2025Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162, 170 , 125 S. Ct. 2410 , 162 L. 2025Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162, 170 , 125 S. Ct. 2410 , 162 L. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Faulkner v. Department of Corrections
green
2 sentences2024ANALYSIS Gronquist appeals the trial court’s decision, contending that (1) the trial court erred in reversing its original decision holding that gross negligence was sufficient to establish bad faith; (2) regardless of the exact standard, he has shown that DOC acted in bad faith, and; (3) the trial 3 At the time, the trial court was evaluating a separate PRA case, in which the parties cited to the cases of Faulkner v. Dep't of Corr., 183 Wn. 2024App. 93 , 332 P.3d 1136 (2014) and Hoffman v. Kittitas County, 194 Wn.2d 217 , 449 P.3d 277 (2019). 7 No. 58808-1-II court erred in denying his request for additional discovery and rejecting his motion for reconsideration. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Irby
green
1 sentence2016More troubling is the majority’s apparent recognition of our prior case holdings, without explanation or analysis of what new rule, if any, is being crafted. ¶17 In State v. Irby, 170 Wn.2d 874 , 246 P.3d 796 (2011), we analyzed both the Fourteenth Amendment due process right under the United States Constitution and the article I, section 22 right to presence under the Washington Constitution. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Irby
green
1 sentence2016More troubling is the majority’s apparent recognition of our prior case holdings, without explanation or analysis of what new rule, if any, is being crafted. ¶17 In State v. Irby, 170 Wn.2d 874 , 246 P.3d 796 (2011), we analyzed both the Fourteenth Amendment due process right under the United States Constitution and the article I, section 22 right to presence under the Washington Constitution. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Hartzell
green
1 sentence2016App. 918, 937 , 237 P.3d 928 (2010) (holding that the trial court is not required to give the exact instruction proposed). 9 No. 47336-4-II The trial court did not err by instructing the jury on the statutory burden and standard. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Perin v. Cathcart
green
2 sentences1911Perin v. Cathcart, 115 Iowa 553 , 89 N. W. 12 . 1911Perin v. Cathcart, 115 Iowa 553 , 89 N. W. 12 . | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.