Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hendersongreen2 sentences1994He mentioned his probation officer and a trial that was forthcoming in Birmingham. 23 .The Henderson rule requires that at least three criteria must be met to satisfy federal constitutional confrontation rights: 1. by implication, the evidence must not be crucial or devastating; 2. the state must make a good-faith effort to secure the presence of the declarant; 3. the evidence must bear its own indicia of reliability if offered under an exception to the hearsay rule. 554 S.W.2d at 119-120 . 24 . 1994He mentioned his probation officer and a trial that was forthcoming in Birmingham. 23 .The Henderson rule requires that at least three criteria must be met to satisfy federal constitutional confrontation rights: 1. by implication, the evidence must not be crucial or devastating; 2. the state must make a good-faith effort to secure the presence of the declarant; 3. the evidence must bear its own indicia of reliability if offered under an exception to the hearsay rule. 554 S.W.2d at 119-120 . 24 . | 2 | 3 |
Ohio v. Robertsred2 sentences2010Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. at 65, n. 7 , 100 S.Ct. at 2538 n. 7; Sherman v. Scott, 62 F.3d 136, 140 (5th Cir. 1995). 2010Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. at 65, n. 7 , 100 S.Ct. at 2538 n. 7; Sherman v. Scott, 62 F.3d 136, 140 (5th Cir. 1995). | 2 | 2 |
Sherman v. Scottgreen2 sentences2010Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. at 65, n. 7 , 100 S.Ct. at 2538 n. 7; Sherman v. Scott, 62 F.3d 136, 140 (5th Cir. 1995). 2010Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. at 65, n. 7 , 100 S.Ct. at 2538 n. 7; Sherman v. Scott, 62 F.3d 136, 140 (5th Cir. 1995). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Ricegreen1 sentence2016Therefore, trial counsel’s oral request for a jury instruction on possession of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony as a lesser-ineluded offense of employment of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony was insufficient to preserve the issue for appeal. .See, e.g., Moore v. State, 485 S.W.3d 411, 419-20 (Tenn. 2016) (recognizing' that the statute requires a defendant to request lesser-ineluded offense instructions in ' writing to avoid waiver of the issue); State v. Rice, 184 S.W.3d 646, 675-76 (Tenn. 2006); State v. Wilson, 211 S.W.3d 714, 720 (Tenn. 2007). 9 .T | 1 | 1 |
State of Tennessee v. Broderick Devonte Faynegreen1 sentence2016See Fayne, 451 S.W.3d at 372 n. 6. 10 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wilsongreen1 sentence2016Therefore, trial counsel’s oral request for a jury instruction on possession of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony as a lesser-ineluded offense of employment of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony was insufficient to preserve the issue for appeal. .See, e.g., Moore v. State, 485 S.W.3d 411, 419-20 (Tenn. 2016) (recognizing' that the statute requires a defendant to request lesser-ineluded offense instructions in ' writing to avoid waiver of the issue); State v. Rice, 184 S.W.3d 646, 675-76 (Tenn. 2006); State v. Wilson, 211 S.W.3d 714, 720 (Tenn. 2007). 9 .T | 1 | 1 |
Rashe Moore v. State of Tennesseegreen1 sentence2016Therefore, trial counsel’s oral request for a jury instruction on possession of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony as a lesser-ineluded offense of employment of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony was insufficient to preserve the issue for appeal. .See, e.g., Moore v. State, 485 S.W.3d 411, 419-20 (Tenn. 2016) (recognizing' that the statute requires a defendant to request lesser-ineluded offense instructions in ' writing to avoid waiver of the issue); State v. Rice, 184 S.W.3d 646, 675-76 (Tenn. 2006); State v. Wilson, 211 S.W.3d 714, 720 (Tenn. 2007). 9 .T | 1 | 1 |
State v. Alleygreen2 sentences2003See State v. Alley, 968 S.W.2d 314, 317-18 (Tenn. Crim. 2003See State v. Alley, 968 S.W.2d 314, 317-18 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dutton v. Evans
green
2 sentences2003Finally, the Henderson test requires that the evidence to be admitted “bear its own ‘indicia of reliability.’” Id. at 120 (citing Dutton, 400 U.S. at 89 ). 2003Finally, the Henderson test requires that the evidence to be admitted “bear its own ‘indicia of reliability.’” Id. at 120 (citing Dutton, 400 U.S. at 89 ). | 2 | 1980–2003 |
People v. Farrell
yellow
2 sentences2004Farrell, 34 P.3d at 406-07 . 2004Farrell, 34 P.3d at 406-07 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.