Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Grayless v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Grayless v. State , 567 S.W.2d 216, 222 (Tex. Crim. 2010See Grayless v. State, 567 S.W.2d 216, 222 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Barker v. Wingogreen2 sentences2022Instead, its status depends on the application of the balancing test adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo, “in which the conduct of both the prosecution and the defendant are weighed” on an ad hoc basis, considering these four factors: (1) length of the delay; (2) reason for the delay; (3) the defendant’s assertion of the right; and (4) prejudice to the defendant. 407 U.S. at 530 ; see Cantu, 253 S.W.3d at 280 . 1994See Barker , 407 U.S. at 532 n.31. | 1 | 3 |
Cantu v. Stategreen1 sentence2022Instead, its status depends on the application of the balancing test adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo, “in which the conduct of both the prosecution and the defendant are weighed” on an ad hoc basis, considering these four factors: (1) length of the delay; (2) reason for the delay; (3) the defendant’s assertion of the right; and (4) prejudice to the defendant. 407 U.S. at 530 ; see Cantu, 253 S.W.3d at 280 . | 1 | 1 |
Easley v. Stategreen1 sentence1992A five year lapse from the time of arrest until the time of trial “is certainly sufficient to require the application of the balancing test of Barker v. Wingo, supra, and that time must be considered in determining appellant’s speedy trial claim.” Easley v. State, 564 S.W.2d 742, 744 (Tex. Crim.App.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 967 , 99 S.Ct. 456 , 58 L.Ed.2d 425 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Flores
green
1 sentence1999Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Easley v. Texas
green
2 sentences1992A five year lapse from the time of arrest until the time of trial “is certainly sufficient to require the application of the balancing test of Barker v. Wingo, supra, and that time must be considered in determining appellant’s speedy trial claim.” Easley v. State, 564 S.W.2d 742, 744 (Tex. Crim.App.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 967 , 99 S.Ct. 456 , 58 L.Ed.2d 425 (1978). 1992A five year lapse from the time of arrest until the time of trial “is certainly sufficient to require the application of the balancing test of Barker v. Wingo, supra, and that time must be considered in determining appellant’s speedy trial claim.” Easley v. State, 564 S.W.2d 742, 744 (Tex. Crim.App.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 967 , 99 S.Ct. 456 , 58 L.Ed.2d 425 (1978). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Charter Medical Corp. v. Miller
green
1 sentence1987Charter Medical Corp. v. Miller, 605 S.W.2d 943 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1980, writ ref’d n.r.e.). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.