Austin court analysis (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

Austin court analysis in Texas

8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1935–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Rodriguez v. Stategreen
texapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004Id. at 406.

11
Seitz v. Lamar Savings Ass'ngreen
texapp · 1981 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993Ass’n, 618 S.W.2d 142, 145-46 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1981, no writ), the Austin court applied the standard set forth in Mirabal v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 587 F.2d 871, 878 (7th Cir. 1976), aff'd on other grounds, 576 F.2d 729 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1089 , 99 S.Ct. 642 , 58 L.Ed.2d 699 (1978).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Green International, Inc. v. State green
texapp · 1994
2 sentences

2009We again rely on the Austin Court's analysis in Green . 877 S.W.2d at 433-35 .

1996We again rely on the Austin Court's analysis in Green . 877 S.W.2d at 433-35 .

21996–2009
Long Canyon Phase II & III Homeowners Ass'n v. Cashion green
texapp · 2017
2 sentences

2020The homeowners in Long Canyon argued that the allegations in the association’s demand letter were meritless and made in bad faith, and thus the letter was an act of “sham petitioning,” which is a “category of speech that falls outside First Amendment protection.” Long Canyon, 517 S.W.3d at 221 .

2020Id. at 220–21; see Moricz v. Long, No. 06-17-00011-CV, 2017 WL 3081512 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Texarkana July 20, 2017, no pet.) (following Austin Court’s analysis in Long Canyon).

12020–2020
In Re CR green
texapp · 1999
1 sentence

2001Id. at 782 .

12001–2001
John Mirabal and Sharon Mirabal v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation, a Corporation, and Ed Murphy Buick-Opel, Inc., a Corporation green
ca7 · 1978
1 sentence

1993Ass’n, 618 S.W.2d 142, 145-46 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1981, no writ), the Austin court applied the standard set forth in Mirabal v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 587 F.2d 871, 878 (7th Cir. 1976), aff'd on other grounds, 576 F.2d 729 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1089 , 99 S.Ct. 642 , 58 L.Ed.2d 699 (1978).

11993–1993
Mirabal v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. green
scotus · 1978
1 sentence

1993Ass’n, 618 S.W.2d 142, 145-46 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1981, no writ), the Austin court applied the standard set forth in Mirabal v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 587 F.2d 871, 878 (7th Cir. 1976), aff'd on other grounds, 576 F.2d 729 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1089 , 99 S.Ct. 642 , 58 L.Ed.2d 699 (1978).

11993–1993
Gaetano v. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit green
scotus · 1978
1 sentence

1993Ass’n, 618 S.W.2d 142, 145-46 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1981, no writ), the Austin court applied the standard set forth in Mirabal v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 587 F.2d 871, 878 (7th Cir. 1976), aff'd on other grounds, 576 F.2d 729 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1089 , 99 S.Ct. 642 , 58 L.Ed.2d 699 (1978).

11993–1993
Hight v. Jim Bass Ford, Inc. green
texapp · 1977
2 sentences

1983The Austin court applied the doctrine in Hight v. Jim Bass Ford, Inc., 552 S.W.2d 490 (Tex.Civ.

1983The Austin court applied the doctrine in Hight v. Jim Bass Ford, Inc., 552 S.W.2d 490 (Tex.Civ.

11983–1983
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Mitchell neutral
texapp · 1899
2 sentences

1935Co. v. Mitchell, 21 Tex.Civ.App. 463 , 51 S.W. 662 , the Austin court applied the rule in criminal cases to civil cases and referred to the rule as stated.

1935Co. v. Mitchell, 21 Tex.Civ.App. 463 , 51 S.W. 662 , the Austin court applied the rule in criminal cases to civil cases and referred to the rule as stated.

11935–1935

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check