Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1967–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Washington v. City of Houstongreen2 sentences2008See Washington v. City of Houston , 874 S.W.2d 791, 794 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 1994, writ denied) (party may plead himself "out of court by pleading facts that affirmatively negate" cause of action). 2008See Washington v. City of Houston, 874 S.W.2d 791, 794 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1994, writ denied) (party may 6 The Wagners also filed a “First Amended Petition.” The trial court states in its order of dismissal that it specifically considered both the original and amended petitions. | 2 | 2 |
ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Colemangreen1 sentence2026Enterprise does not contend that Clean-Co performed the historical purchase 9 Among others, In re City of Galveston, 622 S.W.3d 851 , 858 & n.28 (Tex. 2021) (citing ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Coleman, 512 S.W.3d 895, 900 (Tex. 2017)). 6 orders deficiently, nor does Clean-Co seek recovery under them. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Robinson v. State
green
2 sentences1990The dissent below focuses on our language from Robinson v. State, 739 S.W.2d 795 (Tex.Cr.App.1987), holding that Art. 32A.02 V.A.C.C.P. was void from its inception and “cannot be the basis for any claim of right or relief.” Lapasnick, 751 S.W.2d at 881 , (Cadena, C.J. dissenting). 1988In Robinson v. State, 739 S.W.2d 795 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (en banc), the Court unequivocally adopted the rule that an unconstitutional statute is void from its inception and cannot be the basis for any claim of right or relief. | 2 | 1988–1990 |
Willis v. Marshall
green
1 sentence2015Id. 3 Appellee spends several pages arguing that it has met its burden to plead jurisdictional facts and that Buswell must do more than simply establish non-residence, relying on Carey v. State, 2010 WL 2838631 (Tex. App.—San Antonio, July 21, 2010, pet. denied). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Lapasnick v. State
green
1 sentence1990The dissent below focuses on our language from Robinson v. State, 739 S.W.2d 795 (Tex.Cr.App.1987), holding that Art. 32A.02 V.A.C.C.P. was void from its inception and “cannot be the basis for any claim of right or relief.” Lapasnick, 751 S.W.2d at 881 , (Cadena, C.J. dissenting). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State Board of Insurance v. Betts
green
1 sentence1967In State Board of Insurance v. Betts, 158 Tex. 612 , 315 S.W.2d 279 , cited by the Supreme Court in Freeman, the Honorable Charles O. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
State Board of Insurance v. Betts
green
1 sentence1967In State Board of Insurance v. Betts, 158 Tex. 612 , 315 S.W.2d 279 , cited by the Supreme Court in Freeman, the Honorable Charles O. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.