claimant is asserting claim (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

claimant is asserting claim in Texas

7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Scott v. Cannongreen
texapp · 1998 · cited in 4 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2010
2 sentences

2010See Scott, 959 S.W.2d at 722 .

2010See Scott , 959 S.W.2d at 722 .

44
Butler v. Hansongreen
tex · 1970 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006See Butler v. Hanson, 455 S.W.2d 942, 945-46 (Tex.1970). 6 .

11
Cunningham v. Easthamgreen
texapp · 1971 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992Cunningham v. Eastham, 465 S.W.2d 189, 193 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, writ ref’d n.r.e.), citing Orsborn v. Deep Rock Oil Corp., 153 Tex. 281 , 267 S.W.2d 781 (1954).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Barbara Jean Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Offshore Express, Inc., Cross-Appellee green
ca5 · 1988
1 sentence

2006Id. ' 90.004(d),(e).

12006–2006
Orsborn v. Deep Rock Oil Corp. green
tex · 1954
2 sentences

1992Cunningham v. Eastham, 465 S.W.2d 189, 193 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, writ ref’d n.r.e.), citing Orsborn v. Deep Rock Oil Corp., 153 Tex. 281 , 267 S.W.2d 781 (1954).

1992Cunningham v. Eastham, 465 S.W.2d 189, 193 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, writ ref’d n.r.e.), citing Orsborn v. Deep Rock Oil Corp., 153 Tex. 281 , 267 S.W.2d 781 (1954).

11992–1992

Where else courts name it

TX 7 (1992–2010) CA 2 (1960–1976)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check